Evaluation of highway design parameters on influencing operator speeds through Casewise Visual Evaluation

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2195, 2010, Pages 143-149

  Stamatiadis, Nikiforos ^a   Bailey, Keiron ^c   Grossardt, Ted ^b   Ripy, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; HIGHWAY PLANNING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DESIGN PARAMETERS; DRIVER'S BEHAVIOR; DRIVING SPEED; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; MODELLING SYSTEMS; NON-LINEAR MODELLING; OPERATING SPEED; RESEARCH FIELDS; VIDEO SIMULATION; VISUAL EVALUATION;

SPEED;

EID: 79951541363     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2195-15     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Scallen, S., and J. Carmody. Investigating the Effects of Roadway Design on Driver Behavior: Applications for Minnesota Highway Design, University of Minnesota and Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 1999.
2. Stamatiadis, N. International Scanning Tour on Highway Geometric Design. Report No. FHWA-PL-01-026. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.
3. Naderi, J. R., B. S. Kweon, and P. Maghelal. Simulating Impacts of Curb-Side Trees on Driver Performance and Perception. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
4. Fitzpatrick, K., K. Balke, D. W. Harwood, and I. B. Anderson. NCHRP Report 440: Accident Mitigation Guide for Congested Rural Two-Lane Highways. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
5. Bittner, A. C., Jr., O. Simsek, W. H. Levison, and J. L. Campbell. On- Road Versus Simulator Data in Driver Model Development: Driver Performance Model Experience. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1803, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 38-44.
6. Reed, M. P., and P. Green. Comparison of Driving Performance On- Road and in a Low-Cost Simulator Using a Concurrent Telephone Dialing Task. Ergonomics, Vol. 42, No. 8, 1999, pp. 1015-1037. (Pubitemid 29401736)
7. Huang, A. R., and C. Chen. A Low-Cost Driving Simulator for Full Vehicle Dynamics Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2003, pp. 162-172.
8. Bella, F. Effects of Driver Perception of Combined Curves on Speed and Lateral Placement. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
9. Zakowska, L., A. Benedetto, A. Calvi, and F. D'Amico. The Effect of Curve Characteristics on Driving Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
10. Lamm, R., S. Cafiso, G. La Cava, and A. Beck. To What Extent the Human Being Is So Far Regarded in Modern Highway Geometric Design-An International Review and a Personal Outlook. Compendium of Papers 3rd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Chicago, Ill., 2005.
11. Stamatiadis, N., K. Bailey, T. H. Grossardt, J. Ripy, and A. Strombotne. Use of Context Sensitive Methods to Influence Operating Speeds: Case Study of Rural Highway by Casewise Visual Evaluation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2025, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 90-97. (Pubitemid 351262802)
12. Steinitz, C. Toward a Sustainable Landscape with High Visual Preference and High Ecological Integrity. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 19, 1990, pp. 213-150.
13. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2004.
14. Peeta, S., W. Zhou, and P. Zhang. Modeling and Mitigation of Car-Truck Interactions on Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1899, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 117-126. (Pubitemid 40407033)
15. Bailey, K., J. Brumm, and T. Grossardt. Towards Structured Public Involvement in Highway Design: A Comparative Study of Visualization Methods and Preference Modeling using CAVE (Casewise Visual Evaluation). Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-15.
16. Bailey, K., T. H. Grossardt, J. Ripy, L. Toole, J. B. Williams, and J. Dietrick. Structured Public Involvement in Context-Sensitive Large Bridge Design Using Casewise Visual Evaluation: Case Study of Section 2 of Ohio River Bridges Project. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2028, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 19-27. (Pubitemid 351472990)
17. Fuzzy Knowledge Builder. Fuzzy Systems Engineering, Poway, Calif., 1999.
18. Bailey, K., T. Grossardt, and M. Pride-Wells. Community Design of a Light Rail Transit-Oriented District using CAVE (Casewise Visual Evaluation). Socio Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007, pp. 235-254. (Pubitemid 46796809)
19. Molino, J. A. Using Subjective Rating Scale in Driving Simulator to Predict Real-World Stimulus-Response Relationships Concerning Nighttime Delineation for Curves. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.