Use of context-sensitive methods to influence operating speeds: Case study of rural highway by casewise visual evaluation

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2025, 2007, Pages 90-97

  Stamatiadis, Nikiforos ^a   Bailey, Keiron ^c   Grossardt, Ted ^d   Ripy, John ^d   Strombotne, Anne ^b  

^a 265 Raymond Building

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUZZY SETS; SAFETY FACTOR;

DESIGN SPEEDS; ELECTRONIC AUDIENCE; LANE WIDTH; SHOULDER WIDTH;

HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 39349086829     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2025-09     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.
2. Tignor, S. Driver Visual Search of Objects in and near the Roadway. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
3. Steyer, R. Design Criteria for Curves on Two-Lane Rural Highways. In Transportation Research Circular E-C003: International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design Practices. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 1-8.
4. Lamm, R., S. Cafiso, G. La Cava, and A. Beck. To What Extent the Human Being Is So Far Regarded in Modern Highway Geometric Design-An International Review and a Personal Outlook. Proc., 3rd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Chicago, 111., 2005.
5. Fitzpatrick, K., K. Balke, D. Harwood, and I. Anderson. NCHRP Report 440: Accident Mitigation Guide for Congested Rural Two-Lane Highways. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
6. Fancher, P. S., Z. Bareket, and S. Bogard. Modeling Driver Behavior by Using Mind's Eye Coordinates. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1778, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 1-8.
7. Misaghi, P., and Y. Hassan. Modeling Operating Speed and Speed Differential on Two Lane Roads. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 6, 2005, pp. 408-417.
8. Scallen, S., and J. Carmody. Investigating the Effects of Roadway Design on Driver Behavior: Applications for Minnesota Highway Design. University of Minnesota and Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 1999.
9. Naderi, J. R., B.-S. Kweon, and P. Maghelal. Simulating Impacts of Curbside Trees on Driver Performance and Perception. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
10. Driving Simulator. Center for Transportation Safety, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, tti.tamu.edu/cts/cts/ facilities/driving_simulator.stm. Accessed June 20,2006.
11. Bella, F. Effects of Driver Perception of Combined Curves on Speed and Lateral Placement. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
12. Richl, L., and T. Sayed. Effect of Speed Prediction Models and Perceived Radius on Design Consistency. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2005, pp. 388-399.
13. Zadeh, L. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1965, pp. 338-353.
14. Lee, D., M. T. Pietrucha, and S. Sinha. Use of Fuzzy Sets to Evaluate Driver Perception of Variable Message Signs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1937, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 96-104.
15. Meegoda, J. N., T. M. Juliano, and A. Banerjee. Framework for Automatic Condition Assessment of Culverts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1948, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 26-34.
16. Cheng H.-D., H. Du, L. Hu, and C. Glazier. Vehicle Detection and Classification Using Model-Based and Fuzzy Logic Approaches. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1935, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 154-162.
17. Peeta, S., W. Zhou, and P. Zhang. Modeling and Mitigation of Car-Truck Interactions on Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1899, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 117-126.
18. Bailey, K., J. Brumm, and T. Grossardt. Towards Structured Public Involvement in Highway Design: A Comparative Study of Visualization Methods and Preference Modeling Using CAVE (Casewise Visual Evaluation). Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-15.
19. Bailey, K., J. Brumm, and T. Grossardt. Integrating Visualization into Structured Public Involvement: Case Study of Highway Improvement in Central Kentucky. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1817, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 50-57.
20. Bailey, K., T. Grossardt, J. Ripy, L. Toole, J. B. Williams, and J. Dietrick. Structured Public Involvement in Context-Sensitive Bridge Design Using Casewise Visual Evaluation: Case Study of Section 2 of Ohio River Bridges Project. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2028, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 19-27.
21. Bailey, K., T. Grossardt, and M. Pride-Wells. Community Design of a Light Rail Transit-Oriented Development Using Casewise Visual Evaluation (CAVE). SocioEconomic Planning Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007, pp. 235-254.
22. Grossardt, T., K. Bailey, and J. Brumm. Structured Public Involvement: Problems and Prospects for Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1858, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 95-102.
23. Fuzzy Knowledge Builder. Fuzzy Systems Engineering, Poway, Calif., 1999.
24. Dimitropoulos, I., and G. Kanellaidis. Highway Geometric Design: The Issue of Driving Behavior Variability. In Transportation Research Circular E-C003: International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design Practices. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 41-48.
25. Rudin-Brown, C. M. Vehicle Height Affects Drivers' Speed Perception: Implications for Rollover Risk. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1899, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 84-89.
26. Eck, R. W., and G. Winn. Older-Driver Perception of Problems at Unsignalized Intersections on Divided Highways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1818, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 70-77.