The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000-2007

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 189-199

  Atkinson Palombo, Carol ^a   Kuby, Michael J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Light rail transit; Overlay zoning patterns; Transit oriented development; Uneven development; Urban investment patterns

Indexed keywords

GIS; INVESTMENT; LIGHT RAIL SYSTEM; PARK AND RIDE; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; UNEVEN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN TRANSPORT;

ARIZONA; PHOENIX; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951508305     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abbitt J.W. History of Transit in the Valley of the Sun: a History of Public Transportation in Phoenix, Arizona, 1887-1989 1990, Public Transit Department, Phoenix, Arizona.
2. AG M. Growing Smarter Implementation Project Best Practices: Transit-oriented Development 2003, Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix, Arizona.
3. ARPA, 2006. History of Transportation Elections in the Valley of the Sun, 1960-2000. Arizona Rail Passenger's Information 2006. (accessed 15.11.2006).
4. Babalik-Sutcliffe E. Urban rail systems: analysis of the factors behind success. Transport Reviews 2002, 22(4):415-447.
5. Belzer Dena, Autler Gerald, Espinosa Judith, Feigon Sharon, Ohland Gloria The transit-oriented development drama and its actors. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-oriented Development 2004, Island Press, Washington, Covelo and London. H. Dittmar, G. Ohland (Eds.).
6. Bernick M., Cervero R. Transit Villages for the 21st Century 1997, McGraw Hill, New York.
7. Bertolini L., Split T. City on Rails: the Redevelopment of Railway Station Areas 1998, Routledge, New York and London.
8. Boarnet M.G., Compin N.S. Transit-oriented development in San Diego county - the incremental implementation of a planning idea. Journal of the American Planning Association 1999, 65(1):80-95.
9. Boarnet M.G., Crane R. Public finance and transit-oriented planning: new evidence from southern California. Journal of Planning Education and Research 1998, 17(3):206-219.
10. Breznau Shanti. The San Jose case study: Ohlone-Chynoweth station. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-oriented Development 2004, Island Press, Washington, Covelo and London. H. Dittmar, G. Ohland (Eds.).
11. Calthorpe Peter The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community and the American Dream 1993, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
12. Cervero R. Bart @ 20: Land Use and Development Impacts 1995, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley.
13. Cervero, R., Duncan M., 2002. Transit's Value-added Effects - Light and Commuter Rail Services and Commercial Land Values. In: Travel Demand And Land Use 2002.
14. Cervero R. Transit-oriented development's ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(9):2068-2085.
15. Cervero R., Kockelman K.M. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment 1997, 3:199-219.
16. Cervero R., Landis J. Twenty years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit System: land use and development impacts. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice 1997, 31(4):309-333.
17. City and County of Denver, 2006. Transit-oriented Development Strategic Plan. Community Planning and Development, Denver, Colorado.
18. City of Phoenix, Arizona, 2002. Interim Transit-oriented District Overlay Zoning Ordinance, edited by C. o. P. P. Department: City of Phoenix Planning Department.
19. City of Phoenix, Arizona. 2004. Downtown Phoenix: A Strategic Vision and Blueprint for the Future.
20. City of Portland, Oregon, 2008. Portland Online, edited by B. o. D. S. (BDS). Portland, Oregon, City of Portland.
21. City of Tempe, Arizona. 2006. City of Tempe, Arizona, Zoning and Development Code (Amended), edited by P. Department.
22. Dear M. Understanding and overcoming the nimby syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association 1992, 58(3):288-300.
23. Deng F.F. The rebound of private zoning: property rights and local governance in urban land use. Environment and Planning A 2003, 35(1):133-149.
24. Devore J., Peck R. The Exploration and Analysis of Data 2001, Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA. 4th ed.
25. Dittmar Hank, Poticha Shelley Defining transit-oriented development: the new regional building block. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-oriented Development 2004, Island Press, Washington, Covelo and London. H. Dittmar, G. Ohland (Eds.).
26. Ellis G. Discourses of objection: towards an understanding of third-party rights in planning. Environment and Planning A 2004, 36(9):1549-1570.
27. Everitt B. Cluster Analysis 1993, Halstead Press, London, New York.
28. Ewing R., Bartholemew K., Winkelman S., Walters J., Chen D. Growing Cooler: the Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change 2008, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC.
29. Farris J.T. The barriers to using urban infill development to achieve smart growth. Housing Policy Debate 2001, 12(1):1-30.
30. Feigon Sharon, Hoyt David, Ohland Gloria The Atlanta Case Study: Lindbergh City Center. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-oriented Development 2004, Island Press, Washington, Covelo and London. H. Dittmar, G. Ohland (Eds.).
31. Gober P. Metropolitan Phoenix: Place-making and Community-Building in the Desert 2005, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
32. Gober P., Burns E.K. The size and shape of Phoenix's urban fringe. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2002, 21(4):379-390.
33. GPEC, 2006. Growth in Metropolitan Phoenix Municipalities. (accessed 01.09.2006).
34. Hass-Klau C., Crampton G., Benjari R. Economic Impact of Light Rail: the Results of Fifteen Urban Areas in France, Germany, UK and North America 2004, Environmental and Transportation Planning, Brighton, UK.
35. Hess, D.B., Lombardi, P.A., 2004. Policy support for and barriers to transit-oriented development in the inner city - literature review. In: Transit Planning And Development, Management And Performance, Marketing And Fare Policy, And Capacity And Quality Of Service.
36. Kahn M.E. Gentrification trends in new transit-oriented communities: evidence from 14 cities that expanded and built rail transit systems. Real Estate Economics 2007, 35(2):155-182.
37. Khasnabis, S., 1998. Land use and transit integration and transit use incentives. In: Transit Planning, Management, Marketing, New Technology, Capacity, And Quality Of Service.
38. Knight R.L., Trygg L.L. Evidence of land-use impacts of rapid transit systems. Transportation 1977, 6(3):231-247.
39. Konheim, C.S., Ketcham, B., 2000. Effective transit requires walkable communities - land use lessons of transport patterns in four world cities. In: Transportation Land Use and Smart Growth - Planning and Administration.
40. Kuby M., Barranda A., Upchurch C. Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice 2004, 38(3):223-247.
41. Lake R.W. Planners Alchemy transforming nimby to yimby. Journal of the American Planning Association 1993, 59(1):87-93.
42. Landis J., Zhang M. BART and metropolitan land-use change: 1985-1990. Rail Transit Investments, Real Estate Values, and Land Use Change: a Comparative Analysis of Five California Rail Transit Systems 1995, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, California. J. Landis, S. Guhathakurta, W. Huang, M. Zhang, B. Fukuji, S. Sen (Eds.).
43. Landis J., Zhang M., Fukuji B., Sen S. Rail transit investments and station areas land-use changes: 1965-1990. Rail Transit Investments, Real Estate Values, and Land Use Change: a Comparative Analysis of Five California Rail Transit Systems 1995, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, California. J. Landis, S. Guhathakurta, W. Huang, M. Zhang, B. Fukuji, S. Sen (Eds.).
44. Larsen K. New urbanism's role in inner-city neighborhood revitalization. Housing Studies 2005, 20(5):795-813.
45. Lawley D.N. Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method 1971, Butterworths, London.
46. Leach D. The Arlington County case study, Rosslyn-Ballston corridor. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-oriented Development 2004, Island Press, Washington, Covelo and London. H. Dittmar, G. Ohland (Eds.).
47. Mikelbank B.A. A typology of US suburban places. Housing Policy Debate 2004, 15(4):935-963.
48. Ohland Gloria. The Dallas case study: Mockingbird Station and Addison Circle. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-oriented Development 2004, Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London. H. Dittmar, G. Ohland (Eds.).
49. Ohland Gloria. The San Diego case study: Barrio Logan's Mercado project. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-oriented Development 2004, Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London. H. Dittmar, G. Ohland (Eds.).
50. Parzen Julia, Sigal Abby Jo Financing Transit-oriented Development. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-oriented Development 2004, Island Press, Washington, Covelo and London. H. Dittmar, G. Ohland (Eds.).
51. Pendall R. Opposition to housing - NIMBY and beyond. Urban Affairs Review 1999, 35(1):112-136.
52. Renne, John L., and Wells, Jan S., 2005. Transit-oriented Development: Developing a Strategy to Measure Success. In: Jenks, C.W. (Ed.), Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
53. Salvensen D. Promoting transit-oriented development. Urban Land 1996, 37:31-35.
54. Sawicki D.S., Flynn P. Neighborhood indicators: a review of the literature and an assessment of conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of the American Planning Association 1996, 62(2):165-183.
55. Schlossberg, M., Brown, N., 2004. Comparing transit-oriented development sites by walkability indicators. In: Transit Planning and Development, Management and Performance, Marketing and Fare Policy, and Capacity and Quality of Service.
56. Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Responses 2002, The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC. G. Squires (Ed.).
57. Squires G., Kubrin C.E. Privileged places: race, uneven development and the geography of opportunity in urban America. Urban Studies 2005, 42(1):47-68.
58. Suchman Diane R., Sowell Margaret B. Developing Infill Housing in Inner-City Neighborhoods 1997, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC.
59. TCRP Commuter and Light Rail Transit Corridors: The Land Use Connection 1996, Transit Cooperative Research Program, Washington, DC.
60. TCRP, 1997. The role of transit in creating livable metropolitan communities. In: Project for Public Spaces, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
61. TCRP, 2002. Transit-oriented development and joint development in the United States: a literature review. In: Research Results Digest. Transit-Cooperative Research Program, Washington, DC.
62. TCRP, 2004. Transit-oriented development in the United States: experiences, challenges, and prospects. In: Research Results Digest, Transit-Cooperative Research Program, Washington, DC.
63. Upchurch C., Kuby M., Zoldack M., Barranda A. Using GIS to generate mutually exclusive service areas linking travel on and off a network. Journal of Transport Geography 2004, 12:23-33.
64. US Bureau of the Census, 2008. State and County QuickFacts.
65. Willson R., Menotti V. Commuter parking versus transit-oriented development - evaluation methodology. Transportation Research Record 2007, 2021:118-125.