New urbanism's role in inner-city neighborhood revitalization

Housing Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 795-813

  Larsen, Kristin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Affordable housing; Gentrification; New urbanism

Indexed keywords

GENTRIFICATION; INNER CITY AREA; NEIGHBORHOOD; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN RENEWAL;

EID: 26444530126     PISSN: 02673037     EISSN: 14661810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02673030500214068     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allen, L. (2004) Interview by author. Orlando, FL, 7 May.
2. Arigoni, D. (2001) Affordable Housing and Smart Growth: Making the Connection (Smart Growth Network Subgroup on Affordable Housing).
3. Audirac, I. & Shermyen, A. H. (1994) An evaluation of neotraditional design's social prescription: postmodern placebo or remedy for suburban malaise?, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13, pp. 161-173.
4. Beauregard, R. A. (1989) Between modernity and postmodernity: the ambiguous position of US planning, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7, pp. 381-395.
5. Bernhardt, R. (1998) Interview by author. Tape recording. Orlando, FL, 10 November.
6. Bohl, C. (2000) New urbanism and the city: potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods, Housing Policy Debate, 11, pp. 761-801.
7. Buki, C. (2001) Comment: factors that make neighborhood competitiveness a relative term, Neighborworks Journal, Summer, pp. 43-45.
8. Calthorpe, P. (1993) The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream (New York: Princeton Architectural Press).
9. Campbell, S. (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, pp. 296-312.
10. Christoforidis, A. (1994) New alternatives to the suburb: neo-traditional developments, Journal of Planning Literature, 8, pp. 429-440.
11. City of Orlando, Downtown Development Board (1998) Downtown Orlando - The Place to Be.
12. City of Orlando, Orlando Central City Neighborhood Development Board (1973) Orlando Central City Action Plan. Prepared by Hart, Krivatsy, Stubee.
13. City of Orlando, Planning and Development Department (1981) Orlando Growth Management Plan, 4 vols.
14. City of Orlando, Planning and Development Department (approved 1991, amended 1994) Growth Management Plan Housing Element.
15. City of Orlando, Planning and Development Department (approved 1991, amended 1998) Growth Management Plan Urban Design Element.
16. Congress for the New Urbanism and the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (2000) Principles for Inner City Neighborhood Design (Washington, DC: HUD).
17. Danielsen, K. A., Lang, R. E. & Fulton, W. (1999) Retracting suburbia: smart growth and the future of housing, Housing Policy Debate, 10, pp. 513-540.
18. Day, K. (2003) New urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23, pp. 83-95.
19. Dear, M. (2000) The Postmodern Urban Condition (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers).
20. Dover, Kohl & Partners (1994) The Parramore Heritage District Master Plan.
21. Downs, A. (1994) New Visions for Metropolitan America (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution and Cambridge, MA: The Lincoln Institute for Land Policy).
22. Duany, A. & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1991) Towns and Town-Making Principles (New York: Rizzoli).
23. Duany, A. & Talen, E. (2002) Transect planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68, pp. 245-267.
24. Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company (1999) Draft traditional neighborhood development code, March 1 draft.
25. Duerksen, C. J. (1996) Form character, and context: new directions in land use regulations. Unpublished paper presented at the American Planning Association Annual Conference in Orlando, April.
26. EDAW (2000) Downtown Outlook: Orlando's Plan for its Central City Neighborhoods. Prepared for City of Orlando, Community Redevelopment Agency.
27. Fainstein, S. S. (2000) New directions in planning theory, Urban Affairs Review, 35, pp. 451-478.
28. Fannie Mae Foundation (2000) Fair growth: connecting sprawl, growth, and social equity. Unpublished paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Conference, Atlanta, 1 November.
29. Fink, M. (1993) Toward a sunbelt urban design manifesto, Journal of the American Planning Association, 59, pp. 320-333.
30. Foglesong, R. E. (1986) Planning the Capitalist City (Boston, MA: Princeton University Press).
31. Freeman, L. & Braconi, F. (2004) Gentrification and displacement: New York City in the 1990s, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70, pp. 39-52.
32. Frieden, B. J. & Sagalyn, L. B. (1992) Downtown, Inc.: How America Rebuilds Cities (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
33. Goldfield, D. R, (1997) Region, Race, and Cities: Interpreting the Urban South (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press).
34. Gratz, R. B. & Mintz, N. (1998) Cities Back from the Edge: New Life for Downtown (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.).
35. Harvey, D. (1997) The new urbanism and the communitarian trap, Harvard Design Magazine, Winter/Spring, pp. 68-69.
36. Hayden, D. (1994) Who plans the USA? A comment on 'Advocacy and pluralism in planning', Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, pp. 160-161.
37. Katz, P. (Ed.) (1994) The New Urbanism, Toward an Architecture of Community (New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.).
38. Kennedy, M. & Leonard, P. (2001) Dealing with neighborhood change: a primer on gentrification and policy choices. Working Paper (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute).
39. Leccese, M. & McCormick, K. (Eds) (2000) The Charter for the New Urbanism (New York: McGraw-Hill).
40. Mallach, A. (2001) Comment: a new paradigm - full of pluses and minuses, Neighborworks Journal, Summer, pp. 39-41.
41. Nelson, A. C. (1999) Ready or not, here they come: the rise in downtown living with policy implications. Paper presented at the ACSP Conference, Chicago, 21-24 October.
42. Poticha, S. R. (2000a) Comment on Charles C. Bohl's 'New urbanism and the city: potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods', Housing Policy Debate, 11, pp. 815-819.
43. Poticha, S. R. (2000b) Foreword, in: M. Leccese & K. McCormick (Eds) The Charter for the New Urbanism (New York: McGraw-Hill).
44. Pyatok, M. (2000a) Comment on Charles C. Bohl's 'New urbanism and the city: potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods', Housing Policy Debate, 11, pp. 803-814.
45. Pyatok, M. (2000b) Martha Stewart vs. Studs Terkel? New urbanism and inner cities neighborhoods that work, Places, 13, pp. 40-43.
46. Schubert, M. (2001) Revitalizing the smart growth debate - revisited, Neighborworks Journal, Summer, pp. 37-38.
47. Sohmer, R. & Lang, R. (2000) Editor's introduction, Housing Policy Debate, 11, pp. 751-760.
48. Talen, E. & Ellis, C. (2002) Beyond relativism: reclaiming the search for good city form, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, pp. 36-49.
49. Teitz, M. B. (1996) American planning in the 1990's: evolution, debate, and challenge, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 649-671.
50. Upton, D. (1997) Just architectural business as usual, Places, 13, pp. 64-66.
51. Weiss, M. (2000) Principle 13, in: M. Leccese & K. McCormick (Eds) The Charter for the New Urbanism (New York: McGraw-Hill).
52. Wyly, E. & Hammel, D. J. (1999) Islands of decay in seas of renewal: housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification, Housing Policy Debate, 10, pp. 711-771.