Embryological evidence identifies wing digits in birds as digits 1, 2, and 3

Science

Volumn 331, Issue 6018, 2011, Pages 753-757

  Tamura, Koji ^a   Nomura, Naoki ^a   Seki, Ryohei ^a   Yonei Tamura, Sayuri ^a   Yokoyama, Hitoshi ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; EMBRYO; PALEONTOLOGY; SKELETON; WING;

ARTICLE; BIRD; CELL LABELING; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FORELIMB; HINDLIMB; LIMB DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHICK EMBRYO; COTURNIX; FORELIMB; HEDGEHOG PROTEINS; HINDLIMB; LIMB BUDS; MICE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TOES; WING;

AVES;

EID: 79951483773     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1198229     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Digit morphological identity (distinguishing a thumb from an index finger by anatomical features) is designated as D1 to D5 in this study.
2. G. P. Wagner, J. A. Gauthier, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5111 (1999).
3. Z. Zhou, Naturwissenschaften 91, 455 (2004).
4. A. O. Vargas, J. F. Fallon, J. Exp. Zool. 304B, 206 (2005).
5. J. R. Hinchliffe, in Vertebrate Limb and Somite Morphogenesis, D. A. Ede, J. R. Hinchliffe, M. Balls, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1977), pp. 293-309.
6. A. C. Burke, A. Feduccia, Science 278, 666 (1997).
7. F. Galis, M. Kundrat, J. A. J. Metz, J. Exp. Zool. 304B, 198 (2005).
8. H. C. Larsson, G. P. Wagner, J. Exp. Zool. 294, 146 (2002).
9. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
10. B. D. Harfe et al., Cell 118, 517 (2004).
11. L. Wolpert, Principles of Development (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, ed. 3, 2007).
12. D. J. Wilson, J. R. Hinchliffe, Development 99, 99 (1987).
13. J. R. Hinchliffe, A. Sansom, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 86, 169 (1985).
14. D. Summerbell, C. Tickle, in Vertebrate Limb and Somite Morphogenesis, D. A. Ede, J. R. Hinchliffe, M. Balls, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1977), pp. 41-53.
15. D. Summerbell, J. H. Lewis, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 33, 621 (1975).
16. K. Sato, Y. Koizumi, M. Takahashi, A. Kuroiwa, K. Tamura, Development 134, 1397 (2007).
17. D. A. Rowe, J. F. Fallon, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 68, 1 (1982).
18. R. D. Riddle, R. L. Johnson, E. Laufer, C. Tabin, Cell 75, 1401 (1993).
19. L. S. Honig, D. Summerbell, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 87, 163 (1985).
20. M. C. M. Welten, F. J. Verbeek, A. H. Meijer, M. K. Richardson, Evol. Dev. 7, 18 (2005).
21. P. J. Scherz, E. McGlinn, S. Nissim, C. J. Tabin, Dev. Biol. 308, 343 (2007).
22. R. Zeller, J. López-Ríos, A. Zuniga, Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 845 (2009).
23. A. O. Vargas, T. Kohlsdorf, J. F. Fallon, J. Vandenbrooks, G. P. Wagner, PLoS One 3, e3325 (2008).
24. A. Uejima et al., Dev. Growth Differ. 52, 223 (2010).
25. C. Chiang et al., Dev. Biol. 236, 421 (2001).
26. T. Amano, K. Tamura, Dev. Dyn. 233, 326 (2005).
27. M. J. Cohn, C. O. Lovejoy, L. Wolpert, M. I. Coates, Bioessays 24, 460 (2002).
28. J. Zhu et al., Dev. Cell 14, 624 (2008).
29. H. C. Larsson, A. C. Heppleston, R. M. Elsey, J. Exp. Zool. 314B, 571 (2010).
30. A. C. Burke, C. E. Nelson, B. A. Morgan, C. Tabin, Development 121, 333 (1995).
31. T. Suzuki, S. M. Hasso, J. F. Fallon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 4185 (2008).
32. We thank S. Kuratani for valuable discussions and comments on this study; R. Ladher, J. Fallon, H. Yajima, T. Suzuki, and D. Sipp for critical reading of this manuscript; and Y. Wakamatsu for supplying quail eggs. H.Y. was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas. This work was supported by the Global Center of Excellence Program (J03) and grants from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan; and the Toray Science Foundation.