How cells use pseudopods for persistent movement and navigation

Science Signaling

Volumn 4, Issue 159, 2011, Pages

  Van Haastert, Peter J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AMOEBA (GENUS); CELL MOTION; CELL STRUCTURE; DICTYOSTELIUM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEEDFORWARD SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPODIUM; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CULTURE; CHEMOTAXIS; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; LEUKEMIA CELL LINE; METABOLISM; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NEUTROPHIL; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TUMOR CELL LINE;

PSEUDOPODA;

CYCLIC AMP; CYCLIC AMP RECEPTOR; CYCLIC GMP; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; PHOSPHOLIPASE A2; RAS PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELLS, CULTURED; CHEMOTAXIS; CYCLIC AMP; CYCLIC GMP; DICTYOSTELIUM; GTP-BINDING PROTEINS; HUMANS; JURKAT CELLS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; NEUTROPHILS; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASES; PHOSPHOLIPASES A2; PSEUDOPODIA; RAS PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, CYCLIC AMP; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 79851473221     PISSN: 19450877     EISSN: 19379145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2001708     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. C. S. Patlak, Random walk with persistence and external bias. Bull. Math. Biophys. 15, 311-338 (1953).
2. M. H. Gail, C. W. Boone, The locomotion of mouse fibroblasts in tissue culture. Biophys. J. 10, 980-993 (1970).
3. R. L. Hall, Amoeboid movement as a correlated walk. J. Math. Biol. 4, 327-335 (1977).
4. M. J. Potel, S. A. Mackay, Preaggregative cell motion in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Sci. 36, 281-309 (1979).
5. E. A. Codling, M. J. Plank, S. Benhamou, Random walk models in biology. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 813-834 (2008).
6. T. Lämmermann, M. Sixt, Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 636-644 (2009).
7. M. Machacek, G. Danuser, Morphodynamic profiling of protrusion phenotypes. Biophys. J. 90, 1439-1452 (2006).
8. A. Mogilner, G. Oster, The physics of lamellipodial protrusion. Eur. Biophys. J. 25, 47-53 (1996).
9. L. Bosgraaf, P. J. M. Van Haastert, The ordered extension of pseudopodia by amoeboid cells in the absence of external cues. PLoS ONE 4, e5253 (2009).
10. L. Bosgraaf, P. J. M. Van Haastert, Navigation of chemotactic cells by parallel signaling to pseudopod persistence and orientation. PLoS ONE 4, e6842 (2009).
11. M. Otsuji, Y. Terashima, S. Ishihara, S. Kuroda, K. Matsushima, A conceptual molecular network for chemotactic behaviors characterized by feedback of molecules cycling between the membrane and the cytosol. Sci. Signal. 3, ra89 (2010).
12. N. Andrew, R. H. Insall, Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 193-200 (2007).
13. P. J. Van Haastert, L. Bosgraaf, The local cell curvature guides pseudopodia towards chemoattractants. HFSP J. 3, 282-286 (2009).
14. L. Li, S. F. Nørrelykke, E. C. Cox, Persistent cell motion in the absence of external signals: A search strategy for eukaryotic cells. PLoS ONE 3, e2093 (2008).
15. J. G. Albeck, J. M. Burke, B. B. Aldridge, M. Zhang, D. A. Lauffenburger, P. K. Sorger, Quantitative analysis of pathways controlling extrinsic apoptosis in single cells. Mol. Cell 30, 11-25 (2008).
16. O. D. Weiner, W. A. Marganski, L. F. Wu, S. J. Altschuler, M. W. Kirschner, An actin-based wave generator organizes cell motility. PLoS Biol. 5, e221 (2007).
17. E. Karsenti, Self-organization in cell biology: A brief history. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 255-262 (2008).
18. S. L. Blagg, M. Stewart, C. Sambles, R. H. Insall, PIR121 regulates pseudopod dynamics and SCAR activity in Dictyostelium. Curr. Biol. 13, 1480-1487 (2003).
19. O. Hoeller, R. R. Kay, Chemotaxis in the absence of PIP3 gradients. Curr. Biol. 17, 813-817 (2007).
20. K. F. Swaney, C. H. Huang, P. N. Devreotes, Eukaryotic chemotaxis: A network of signaling pathways controls motility, directional sensing, and polarity. Annu Rev Biophys 39, 265-289 (2010).
21. A. Bahat, M. Eisenbach, Sperm thermotaxis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 252, 115-119 (2006).
22. M. Zhao, B. Song, J. Pu, T. Wada, B. Reid, G. Tai, F. Wang, A. Guo, P. Walczysko, Y. Gu, T. Sasaki, A. Suzuki, J. V. Forrester, H. R. Bourne, P. N. Devreotes, C. D. McCaig, J. M. Penninger, Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-gamma and PTEN. Nature 442, 457-460 (2006).
23. P. J. M. Van Haastert, P. N. Devreotes, Chemotaxis: Signalling the way forward. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 626-634 (2004).
24. A. A. Bominaar, P. J. M. Van Haastert, Phospholipase C in Dictyostelium discoideum. Identification of stimulatory and inhibitory surface receptors and G-proteins. Biochem. J. 297, 189-193 (1994).
25. P. J. M. van Haastert, M. Postma, Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection. Biophys. J. 93, 1787-1796 (2007).
26. M. Ueda, T. Shibata, Stochastic signal processing and transduction in chemotactic response of eukaryotic cells. Biophys. J. 93, 11-20 (2007).
27. D. Fuller, W. Chen, M. Adler, A. Groisman, H. Levine, W. J. Rappel, W. F. Loomis, External and internal constraints on eukaryotic chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 9656-9659 (2010).
28. I. C. Schneider, J. M. Haugh, Mechanisms of gradient sensing and chemotaxis: Conserved pathways, diverse regulation. Cell Cycle 5, 1130-1134 (2006).
29. J. M. Haugh, Deterministic model of dermal wound invasion incorporating receptor-mediated signal transduction and spatial gradient sensing. Biophys. J. 90, 2297-2308 (2006).
30. M. Hannigan, L. Zhan, Z. Li, Y. Ai, D. Wu, C. K. Huang, Neutrophils lacking phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma show loss of directionality during N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe-induced chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 3603-3608 (2002).
31. S. G. Ward, Do phosphoinositide 3-kinases direct lymphocyte navigation? Trends Immunol. 25, 67-74 (2004).