A new perspective on VBAC: A retrospective cohort study

Women and Birth

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-9

  Rozen, Genia ^a   Ugoni, Antony M ^a   Sheehan, Penny M ^a  

^a ROYAL WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Delivery; Robson's criteria; Trial of labour; Vaginal birth

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NULLIPARA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VAGINAL INJURY; VAGINAL TEAR;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, MATERNITY; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MATERNAL AGE; MORBIDITY; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79751537004     PISSN: 18715192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2010.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Villar J., Valladares E., Wojdyla D., et al. For the WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group: caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 who global survey on maternal and perinatal health in latin America. Lancet 2006, 367:1819-1829.
2. Lumbiganon P., Laopaiboon M., Gülmezoglu A.M., Souza J.P., Taneepanichskul S., Ruyan P., et al. Group. WHOGSoMaPHR: method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the who global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet 2010, 375:490-499.
3. McCarthy F.P., Rigg L., Cady L., Cullinane F. A new way of looking at caesarean section births. ANZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2007, 47:316-320.
4. Nassar N., Sullivan E.A., Lancaster P., Day P. Australia's mothers and babies 1999 2001, AIHW, NPSU, Sydney.
5. Chan A., Scott J., Nguyen A., Keane R. Pregnancy outcome in south Australia 2000 2001, Pregnancy Outcome Unit, Department of Human Services, Adelaide.
6. Guise J.M., Berlin M., McDonagh M., Osterweil P., Chan B., Helfand M. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 103:420-429.
7. Liu S., Liston R.M., Joseph K.S., Heaman M., Sauve R., Kramer M.S. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ 2007, 176:455-460.
8. Macones G.A. Clinical outcomes in VBAC attempts: what to say to patients?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 199:1-2.
9. Selo-Ojeme D., Abulhassan N., Mandal R., Tirlapur S., Selo-Ojeme U. Preferred and actual delivery mode after a cesarean in London, UK. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008, 102:156-159.
10. Landon M.B. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol 2008, 35:491-504.
11. Rossi A.C., D'Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 199:224-231.
12. Dodd J.M., Crowther C.A., Hiller J.E., Haslam R.R., Robinson J.S. Birth after caesarean study - planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007, 7(17).
13. Dodd J., Crowther C. Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean for women with a single prior caesarean birth: a systematic review of the literature. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004, 44:387-391.
14. Eden K.B., Hashima J.N., Osterweil P., Nygren P., Guise J.M. Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence. Birth 2004, 31:49-60.
15. Landon M.B., Hauth J.C., Leveno K.J., Spong C.Y., Leindecker S., Varner M.W., et al. National institute of child health and human development. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:2581-2589.
16. McDonagh M.S., Osterweil P., Guise J.M. The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review. BJOG 2005, 112:1007-1015.
17. Guise J.M., McDonagh M.S., Osterweil P., Nygren P., Chan B.K., Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004, 329:19-25.
18. Landon M.B., Spong C.Y., Thom E., Hauth J.C., Bloom S.L., Varner M.W., et al. National institute of child health and human development. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 108:12-20.
19. Ogbonmwan S.E., Miller V., Ogbonmwan D.E., Akinsola A.A. Review of vaginal birth after primary caesarean section without prostaglandin induction and or syntocinon augmentation in labour. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010, 23:281-285.
20. Mozurkewich E.L., Hutton E.K. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000, 183:1187-1197.
21. Richter H.E., Brumfield C.G., Cliver S.P. Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear: a comparison of primiparous patients, vaginal births after caesarean deliveries, and patients with previous vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 187:1194-1198.
22. Kamath B.D., Todd J.K., Glazner J.E., Lezotte D., Lynch A.M. Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009, 113:1231-1238.
23. Farnworth A., Robson S.C., Thomson R.G., Watson D.B., Murtagh M.J. Decision support for women choosing mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: a developmental study. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 71:116-124.
24. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel National institutes of health consensus development conference statement; nih consensus development conference: vaginal birth after cesarean 2010, New Insights, Bethesda, Maryland, p. 1-26.
25. Robson M.S. Classification of cesarean sections. Fetal Maternal Med Rev 2001, 12:23-29.
26. Robson M.S. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001, 15:179-194.
27. Turner C.E., Young J.M., Solomon M.J., Ludlow J., Benness C., Phipps H. Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: the views of pregnant women and clinicians. BJOG 2008, 115:1494-1502.
28. Hibbard J.U., Ismail M.A. Failed vaginal birth after a caesarean. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 184:1365-1371.
29. Shipp T.D., Zelop C.M., Repke J.T., Cohen A., Caughey A.B., Lieberman E. Intrapartum uterine rupture and dehiscence in patients with prior lower uterine segment vertical and transverse incisions. Obstet Gynecol 1999, 94:735-740.
30. Diaz S.D., Jones J.E., Seryakov M., Mann W.J. Uterine rupture and dehiscence: ten-year review and case-control study. South Med J 2002, 95:431-435.
31. Rageth J.C., Juzi C., Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss working group of obstetric and gynecologic institutions. Obstet Gynecol 1999, 93:332-337.
32. Blanchette H., Blanchette M., McCabe J., Vincent S. Is vaginal birth after cesarean safe? Experience at a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 184:1478-1484.
33. McMahon M.J., Luther E.R., Bowes W.A.J., Olshan A.F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:689-695.