Review of vaginal birth after primary caesarean section without prostaglandin induction and or syntocinon augmentation in labour

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 281-285

  Ogbonmwan, S E O ^a   Miller, V ^c   Ogbonmwan, D E ^b   Akinsola, A A ^c  

^a Department of Rheumatology   (United Kingdom)

^b PENNINE ACUTE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c BUCKINGHAMSHIRE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Induction; Membrane sweep; Prostin; Syntocinon augmentation; VBAC

Indexed keywords

NITROUS OXIDE PLUS OXYGEN; OXYTOCIN; PETHIDINE; PROSTAGLANDIN;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY SURGERY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR ONSET; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; OXYTOCICS; OXYTOCIN; PREGNANCY; PROSTAGLANDINS; RISK FACTORS; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 77949473270     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767050903067394     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Caesarean sections. Postnote 2002;1-4. Also available at: www. parliament.uk/post/pn184.pdf
2. Menacker F. Trends in caesarean section rates for first births and repeat caesarean rates for low risk women: United States, 1990-2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005;54:1-8.
3. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with trial of labour after prior caesarean delivery. N Eng J Med 2004;351:2581-2589.
4. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). Caesarean section: Summary of procedural effects. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) publication April 2004; p2. ISBN: 1-84257-584-8. Also available at http://www.rcog.org.uk/ resources/public/pdf/cs-algorithm.pdf
5. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper MC, Wapner RJ, et al. The MFMU Caesarean section Registry: factors affecting the success of trial labour after previous caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;193:1016-1023.
6. Emmett C, Shaw A, Montgomery A, Murphy D, on behalf of DiAMOND study group. Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of healthcare professionals and information about health risks. BJOG 2006;113:1438-1445.
7. Guise JM, Berlin M, McDonagh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfand M. Safety of vaginal birth after caesarean: a systemic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:420-429.
8. Smith GC, White IR, Pell JP, Debbie R. Predicting caesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior caesarean section. PloS Med 2005;2:871-878.
9. Coassolo KM, Stamilio DM, Paré E, Peipert JF, Stevens E, Nelson DB, Macones GA. Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after caesarean section attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynaecol 2005;106:700-706.
10. Ravasiax D, Woodx J, Pollard J. Uterine rupture during induction trial of labour in women with previous caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:(Part 2).
11. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 45; Feb 2007, p 3.