Population genetics of introduced bullfrogs, Rana (Lithobates) catesbeianus, in the Willamette Valley, Oregon, USA

Biological Invasions

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 651-658

  Funk, W Chris ^a   Garcia, Tiffany S ^b   Cortina, George A ^c   Hill, Rebbecca H ^b  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Dept of Economics and Thomas Jefferson Program in Public Policy at the College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

Bullfrogs; Europe; Genetic variation; Oregon; Population genetics; Rana (Lithobates) catesbeianus; Source identification

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CYTOCHROME; ENDEMIC SPECIES; FROG; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; POPULATION GENETICS;

GREAT LAKES [NORTH AMERICA]; MISSISSIPPI BASIN; OREGON; UNITED STATES; WILLAMETTE VALLEY;

ANURA; LITHOBATES; RANA CATESBEIANA;

EID: 79751536949     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9855-z     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Austin JD, Lougheed SC, Boag PT (2004) Discordant temporal and geographic patterns in maternal lineages of eastern North American frogs, Rana catesbeiana (Ranidae) and Pseudacris crucifer (Hylidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 32: 799-816.
2. Cameron EK, Bayne EM, Coltman DW (2008) Genetic structure of invasive earthworms Dendrobaena octaedra in the boreal forest of Alberta: insights into introduction mechanisms. Mol Ecol 17: 1189-1197.
3. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9: 1657-1659.
4. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17: 431-449.
5. Estoup A, Beaumont M, Sennedot F, Moritz C, Cornuet J-M (2004) Genetic analysis of complex demographic scenarios: spatially expanding populations of the cane toad, Bufo marinus. Evolution 58: 2021-2036.
6. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
7. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3. 0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 1: 47-50.
8. Ficetola GF, Coic C, Detaint M, Berroneau M, Lorvelec O, Miaud C (2007) Pattern of distribution of the American bullfrog Rana catesbeiana in Europe. Biol Invasions 9: 767-772.
9. Ficetola GF, Bonin A, Miaud C (2008) Population genetics reveals origin and number of founders in a biological invasion. Mol Ecol 17: 773-782.
10. Gammon M, Kesseli R (2010) Haplotypes of Fallopia introduced into the US. Biol Invasions 12: 421-427.
11. Garner TWJ, Perkins MW, Govindarajulu P, Seglie D, Walker S, Cunningham AA, Fisher MC (2006) The emerging amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis globally infects introduced populations of the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Biol Lett 2: 455-459.
12. Geller JB, Darling JA, Carlton JT (2010) Genetic perspectives on marine biological invasions. Annu Rev Mar Sci 2: 367-393.
13. Goebel AM, Donnelly JM, Atz ME (1999) PCR primers and amplification methods for 125 ribosomal DNA, the control region, cytochrome oxidase I, and cytochrome b in bufonids and other frogs, and an overview of PCR primers which have amplified DNA in amphibians successfully. Mol Phylogenet Evol 11: 163-199.
14. Grotkopp E, Rejmanek M, Rost TL (2002) Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am Nat 159: 396-419.
15. Hamilton MA, Murray BR, Cadotte MW, Hose GC, Baker AC, Harris CJ, Licari D (2005) Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecol Lett 8: 1066-1074.
16. Hayes MP, Jennings MR (2005) Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). In: Jones LLC, Leonard WP, Olson DH (eds) Amphibians of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Washington, pp 190-193.
17. Jennings MR, Hayes MP (1985) Pre-1900 Overharvest of California Red-Legged Frogs (Rana aurora draytonii): the Inducement for Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) introduction. Herpetologica 41: 94-103.
18. Kiesecker JM, Blaustein AR, Miller CL (2001) Potential mechanisms underlying the displacement of native red-legged frogs by introduced bullfrogs. Ecology 82: 1964-1970.
19. Kolbe JJ, Glor RE, Schettino LR, Lara AC, Larson A, Losos JB (2004) Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431: 177-181.
20. Kolbe JJ, Glor RE, Schettino LR, Lara AC, Larson A, Losos JB (2007) Multiple sources, admixture, and genetic variation in introduced Anolis lizard populations. Conserv Biol 21: 1612-1625.
21. Kolbe JJ, Larson A, Losos JB, Queiroz Kd (2008) Admixture determines genetic diversity and population differentiation in the biological invasion of a lizard species. Biol Lett 4: 434-437.
22. Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 3883-3888.
23. Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 386-391.
24. Lever C (2003) Naturalized amphibians and reptiles of the world. Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Lindholm AK, Breden F, Alexander HJ, Chan W-K, Thakurta SG, Brooks R (2005) Invasion success and genetic diversity of introduced populations of guppies Poecilia reticulata in Australia. Mol Ecol 14: 3671-3682.
26. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, Poorter MD (2000) 100 of the World's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. ISSG, SSC and IUCN, Auckland, New Zealand.
27. Maddison DR, Maddison WP (2000) MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, ver. 4. 0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
28. May GE, Gelembiuk GW, Panov VE, Orlova MI, Lee CE (2006) Molecular ecology of zebra mussel invasions. Mol Ecol 15: 1021-1031.
29. Moritz C, Schneider CJ, Wake DB (1992) Evolutionary relationships within the Ensatina eschscholtzii complex confirm the ring species interpretation. Syst Biol 41: 273-291.
30. Pauly GB, Hillis DM, Cannatella DC (2009) Taxonomic freedom and the role of official lists of species names. Herpetologica 65: 115-128.
31. Pearl CA, Adams MJ, Bury RB, McCreary B (2004) Asymmetrical effects of introduced bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) on native ranid frogs in Oregon. Copeia 2004: 11-20.
32. Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11: 193-203.
33. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
34. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O'Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 305-332.
35. Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40: 81-102.
36. Waples RS, Gaggiotti O (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol Ecol 15: 1419-1439.