Population genetics reveals origin and number of founders in a biological invasion

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 773-782

  Ficetola, Gentile Francesco ^a,c   Bonin, Aurelie ^b   Miaud, Claude ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Alien species; Biological invasion; Demography; Invasion risk; Mitochondrial DNA; Propagule pressure; Rana catesbeiana

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EUROPE; FEMALE; FOUNDER EFFECT; FROG; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HAPLOTYPE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION MIGRATION;

ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOCHROMES B; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EUROPE; FEMALE; FOUNDER EFFECT; HAPLOTYPES; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RANA CATESBEIANA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; RANA CATESBEIANA;

EID: 38349188437     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03622.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Albertini G (1970) Sulla diffusione della rana toro (Rana catesbeiana Shaw) importata nel mantovano. Atti E Memorie Della Accademia Di Agricoltura Scienze E Lettere Di Verona, 20 (1968-69 67 106.
2. Albertini G, Lanza B (1987) Rana catesbeiana Shaw, 1802 in Italy. Alytes, 6, 117 129.
3. Austin JD, Lougheed SC, Boag PT (2004) Discordant temporal and geographic patterns in maternal lineages of eastern north American frogs, Rana catesbeiana (Ranidae) and Pseudacris crucifer (Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 32, 799 816.
4. Berggren A (2001) Colonization success in Roesel's Bush-Cricket Metrioptera roeseli: the effects of propagule size. Ecology, 82, 274 280.
5. Blaustein AR, Kiesecker JM (2002) Complexity in conservation: lessons from the global decline of amphibian populations. Ecology Letters, 5, 597 608.
6. Briskie JV, Mackintosh M (2004) Hatchling failure increases with severity of population bottlenecks in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 558 561.
7. Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Sol D, Duncan RP, Lockwood JL (2004) Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Biology Letters. doi:.
8. Caughley G (1977) Analysis of Vertebrate Populations. John Wiley & sons, New York.
9. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) tcs: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1657 1660.
10. Colautti RI, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HG (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions, 8, 1023 1037.
11. Crooks J, Soulé ME (1999) Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes and implications. In : Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management (eds Sandlund OT, Schei SJ, Viken A pp. 103 125. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
12. Detaint M, Coïc C (2006) La Grenouille taureau Rana catesbeiana dans le sud-ouest de la France. Premiers résultats du programme de lutte. Bulletin de la Société Herpetologique de France, 117, 41 56.
13. Diamond J (1989) Overview of recent extinctions. In : Conservation for the Twenty-First Century (eds Western D, Pearl MC pp. 37 41. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
14. Durham L, Bennett GW (1963) Age, growth, and homing in the bullfrogs. Journal of Wildlife Management, 27, 107 123.
15. Estoup A, Wilson IJ, Sullivan C, Cornuet JM, Moritz C (2001) Inferring population history from microsatellite and enzyme data in serially introduced cane toads, Bufo marinus. Genetics, 159, 1671 1687.
16. Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro J (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131, 479 491.
17. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online, 1, 47 50.
18. Ferri V (2006) Rana catesbeiana Shaw, 1802. In : Atlas of Italian Amphibians and Reptiles (eds Sindaco R, Doria G, Razzetti E, Bernini F pp. 330 333. Polistampa, Firenze, Italy.
19. Ficetola GF, Coïc C, Detaint M et al 2007a) Pattern of distribution of the American bullfrog Rana catesbeiana in Europe. Biological Invasions, 9, 767 772.
20. Ficetola GF, Garner TWJ, De Bernardi F (2007b) Genetic diversity, but not hatching success, is jointly affected by post glacial colonization and isolation in the threatened frog, Rana latastei. Molecular Ecology, 16, 1787 1797.
21. Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Miaud C (2007c) Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species - the American bullfrog. Diversity and Distributions, 13, 476 485.
22. Forsyth DM, Duncan RP (2001) Propagule size and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird Introductions to New Zealand. American Naturalist, 157, 583 595.
23. Garner TWJ, Perkins MW, Govindarajulu P et al 2006) The emerging amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis globally infects introduced populations of the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Biology Letters, 2, 455 459.
24. Govindarajulu P, Altwegg R, Anholt BR (2005) Matrix model investigation of invasive species control: bullfrogs on Vancouver Island. Ecological Applications, 15, 2161 2170.
25. Hansen MJ, Wilson SD (2006) Is management of an invasive grass Agropyron cristatum contingent on environmental variation? Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 269 290.
26. Hoelzel AR, Halley JM, O'Brien SJ et al 1993) Elephant seal genetic variation and the use of simulation models to investigate historical population bottlenecks. Journal of Heredity, 84, 443 449.
27. Hulme PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 835 847.
28. Jeschke JM, Strayer DL (2006) Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. Global Change Biology, 12, 1608 1619.
29. Kats LB, Ferrer RP (2003) Alien predators and amphibian declines: review of two decades of science and the transition to conservation. Diversity and Distributions, 9, 99 110.
30. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 199 204.
31. Kolbe JJ, Glor RE, Rodriguez Schettino L et al 2004) Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature, 431, 177 181.
32. Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 3883 3888.
33. Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 386 391.
34. Lever C (2003) Naturalized Amphibians and Reptiles of the World. Oxford University Press, New York.
35. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 223 228.
36. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2000) 100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species. A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. ISSG, SSC and IUCN, Auckland, New Zealand. Available from URL: http://www.issg.org/booklet.pdf.
37. May GE, Gelembiuk GW, Panov VE, Orlova MI, Lee CE (2006) Molecular ecology of zebra mussel invasions. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1021 1031.
38. McGeoch MA, Chown SL, Kalwij JM (2006) A global indicator for biological invasion. Conservation Biology, 20, 1635 1646.
39. Memmott J, Craze PG, Harman HM, Syrett P, Fowler SV (2005) The effect of propagule size on the invasion of an alien insect. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 50 62.
40. Miller PS, Hedrick PW (2001) Purging of inbreeding depression and fitness decline in bottlenecked populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14, 595 601.
41. Puth LM, Post DM (2005) Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? Ecology Letters, 8, 715 721.
42. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conservation Biology, 17, 230 237.
43. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E (2005) Ecology of invasive plants - state of the art. In : Invasive Alien Species: a New Synthesis (eds Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA et al pp. 104 161. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
44. Reusch TBH, Ehlers A, Hämmerli A, Worm B (2005) Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 2826 2831.
45. Schmitt T, Hewitt GM (2004) The genetic pattern of population threat and loss: a case study of butterflies. Molecular Ecology, 13, 21 31.
46. Schroeder EE, Baskett TS (1968) Age estimation, growth rates, and population structure in Missouri bullfrogs. Copeia, 1968, 583 592.
47. Stewart JE (1991) Introductions as factors in diseases of fish and aquatic invertebrates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48, 110 117.
48. Strand AE (2002) metasim 1.0: an individual-based environment for simulating population genetics of complex population dynamics. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2, 373 376.
49. Strayer DL, Evinver VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 645 651.
50. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Ward PS (2005) The role of opportunity in the unintentional introduction of non-native ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 17032 17035.
51. Thulin C-G, Simberloff D, Barun A et al 2006) Genetic divergence in the small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus), a widely distributed invasive species. Molecular Ecology, 15, 3947 3956.
52. Vincek V, O'Huigin C, Satta Y et al 1997) How large was the founding population of Darwin's finches? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 264, 111 118.
53. Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology, 86, 3212 3218.
54. Vonesh JR, De la Cruz O (2002) Complex life cycles and density dependance: assessing the contribution of egg mortality to amphibian declines. Oecologia, 133, 325 333.
55. Wang J (2000) Effects of population structures and selection strategies on the purging of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations. Genetical Research, 76, 75 86.
56. Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Rouget M et al 2007) Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in plant invasion ecology. Diversity and Distributions, 13, 11 22.