Towards a cross-sectoral analysis of land use decision-making in Scotland

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 100, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 1-10

  Sutherland, Lee Ann ^a   Barnes, Andrew ^b   McCrum, Gillian ^a   Blackstock, Kirsty ^a   Toma, Luiza ^b  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community land management; Evidence based policy; Land manager typology; Multifunctionality

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; MANAGERS; PUBLIC POLICY;

DECISION MAKING PROCESS; EVIDENCE-BASED; LAND MANAGEMENTS; LAND MANAGERS; LAND-USE DECISIONS; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; SECTORAL ANALYSIS;

LAND USE;

COMMERCIALIZATION; DECISION MAKING; GOVERNMENT RELATIONS; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TYPOLOGY;

SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 79751535471     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agbenyega O., Burgess P.J., Cook M., Morris J. Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Pol. 2009, 26:551-557.
2. Barnes A.P. Does multi-functionality affect technical efficiency. J. Environ. Man. 2006, 80:287-294.
3. Barnes A.P., Willock J., Hall C., Toma L. Farmer perspectives and practices regarding water pollution control programmes in Scotland. Ag. Water Man. 2009, 96:1715-1722.
4. Bohnet I. Assessing retrospective and prospective landscape change through the development of social profiles of landholders: a tool for improving land use planning and policy formulation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 88:1-11.
5. Bohnet I., Potter C., Simmons E. Landscape change in the multi-functional countryside: a biographical analysis of farmer decision-making in the English High Weald. Landscape Research 2003, 28(4):349-364.
6. Bowler I., Clark G., Crockett A., Ilbery B., Shaw A. The development of alternative farm enterprises: a study of family labour farms in the Northern Pennines of England. J. Rural Stud. 1996, 12(3):285-295.
7. Brodt S., Klonsky K., Tourte L. Farmer goals and management styles: implications for advancing biologically based agriculture. Ag. Syst. 2006, 89:90-105.
8. Burgess J., Clark J., Harrison C.M. Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics 2000, 35(1):119-132.
9. Burton R.J.F. Seeing through the 'Good Farmer's' eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of 'Productivist'. Behav. Soc. Ruralis 2004, 44(2):195-215.
10. Carr S., Tait J. Farmers' attitudes to conservation. Built Environ. 1990, 163:218-231.
11. Church A., Ravenscroft N. Landowner responses to financial incentive schemes for recreational access to woodlands in South East England. Land Use Pol. 2008, 25(1):1-16.
12. Dales, B., 2001. Survey of behaviour associated with access and informal recreation. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report F99ACC08.
13. Darnhofer I., Scheeberger W., Freyer B. Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: farmer types and their rationale. Ag. Hum. Val. 2005, 22:39-52.
14. Davies B.B., Hodge I.D. Exploring environmental perspectives in arable agriculture: a Q methodology study in East Anglia, UK. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61:323-333.
15. Emtage N., Herbohn J., Harrison S. Landholders' attitudes to and participation in farm forestry activities in sub-tropical and tropical eastern Australia. Chapter 15. Sustainable Farm Forestry in the Tropics 2001, 195-210. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom. S. Harrison, J.L. Herbohn (Eds.).
16. Emtage N., Herbogn J., Harrison S. Landholder typologies used in the development of natural resource management programs in Australia - a review. Australas. J. Environ. Man. 2006, 13(2):79-94.
17. Emtage N., Herbohn J.L., Harrison S. Landholder profiling and typologies for natural resource management policy and program support: potential and constraints. Environ. Manage. 2007, 40(3):481-492.
18. European Commission, 2008. Directive of the European parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. {COM(2008) 30 final}, {SEC(2008) 57}, {SEC(2008) 85. European Commission, Brussels.
19. Fairweather J., Keating N. Goals and management styles of New Zealand farmers. Ag. Syst. 1994, 44:1-20.
20. Fish R., Seymour S., Watkins C. Conserving english landscapes: land managers and agri-environmental policy. Environ. Plan. A 2003, 35:19-41.
21. Friedman H. Household production and the national economy: concepts for the analysis of agrarian formations. J. Peas. Stud. 1980, 7(2):158-184.
22. Garforth, C., Rehman, T., 2006. Research to Understand the Model the Behaviour and Motivations of Farmers in Responding to Policy Changes (England). Final Report. Research Project EPES 0405/17. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading.
23. Gasson R. Goals and values of farmers. J. Ag. Econ. 1973, 24:521-542.
24. Gasson R., Errington A. The Farm Family Business 1993, CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
25. Gorton M., Douarin E., Davidova S., Latruffe L. Attitudes to agricultural policy and farming futures in the context of the 2003 CAP reform: a comparison of farmers in selected established and new member states. J. Rural Stud. 2008, 24:322-336.
26. Hair J.E., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. 'Multivariate Data Analysis' 2006, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Sixth ed. Pearson International Edition.
27. Herbohn J.L., Emtage N.F., Harrison S.R., Smorfitt D.B. Attitudes of landholders to farm forestry in tropical eastern Australia, attitudes of landholders to farm forestry in tropical eastern Australia. Austral. For. 2005, 68(1):50-58.
28. Howden P., Vanclay F. Mythologization of farming styles in Australian broadacre cropping. Rural Soc. 2000, 65(2):295-310.
29. Ingemarson F., Lindhagen A., Eriksson L. A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 2006, 21(3):249-259.
30. Klepeis P., Gill N., Chisholm L. Emerging amenity landscapes: invasive weeds and land subdivision in rural Australia. Land Use Pol. 2009, 26(2):380-392.
31. Lloyd Tim, Watkins C., Williams D. Turning farmers into foresters via market liberalisation. J. Ag. Econ. 2008, 46(3):361-370.
32. Macgregor B.D., Stockdale A. Land use change on Scottish Highland Estates. Research notes. J. Rural Stud. 1994, 10(3):301-309.
33. Madsen L.M. New Woodlands in Denmark: the role of private landowners. Urban For. Urban Gree. 2003, 1:185-195.
34. Marsden T., Munton R., Ward N. Incorporating social trajectories into uneven agrarian development: farm businesses in upland and lowland Britain. Soc. Ruralis 1992, 32(4):408-430.
35. Mather A. The inter-relationship of afforestation and agriculture in Scotland. Scot. Geograph. J. 1996, 112(2):83-91.
36. Mather A.S., Hill G., Nijnik M. Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorisation?. J. Rural Stud. 2006, 22(4):441-455.
37. Morris C., Potter C. Recruiting the new conservationists: farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK. J. Rural Stud. 1995, 11(1):51-63.
38. National Trust for Scotland, 2009. Web-site: http://www.nts.org.uk/conserve/countryside_inaction.php.
39. Nijnik M., Mather A. Analysing public preferences for woodland integration with other land uses in rural landscapes in Scotland. Land. Urban Plan. 2008, 86:267-275.
40. Nijnik M., Zahvoyska L., Nijnik A., Ode A. Public evaluation of landscape content and change. Land Use Pol. 2009, 26:77-86.
41. Primdahl J. Agricultural landscapes as production and living places. Land. Urban Plan. 1999, 46:143-150.
42. Renting H., Rosssing W.A.H., Groot J.C.J., van der Ploeg J.D., Laurent C., Perraud D., Stobbelaar D.J., van Ittersum M.K. Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J. Environ. Man. 2008, 90(Suppl. 2):S112-S123.
43. Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate (RERAD), 2008. Rural Land Use Study. Project 1: Changing Land Use in Rural Scotland-Drivers and Decision-making, Tender Fiche.
44. Rytteri T. The formation of Enso-Gutzeit's social responsibility. Terra 2003, 115(2):75-87.
45. Salamon S. Ethnic communities and the structure of agriculture. Rural Soc. 1985, 50(3):323-340.
46. Scottish Executive, 2006. The Scottish forestry strategy. Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/SFS2006fcfc101.pdf/$FILE/SFS2006fcfc101.pdf.
47. Scottish Government, 2010. Land use strategy. Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Environment/Countryside/Landusestrategy.
48. Shucksmith M., Herrmann V. Future changes in British agriculture: projecting divergent farm household behaviour. J. Ag. Econ. 2002, 53(1):37-50.
49. Slee B. Social indicators of multifunctional rural land use: the case of forestry in the UK. Ag. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 120:31-40.
50. Sullivan S. Farmers' attitudes about farming and the environment: a survey of conventional and organic farmers. J. Ag. Environ. Ethics 1996, 9(2):123-143.
51. Sutherland L.A. Differentiating farmers: opening the black box of private farming in post-Soviet states. Ag. Hum. Values 2009, 10.1007/s10460-009-9212-y.
52. Sutherland L.A. Environmental grants and regulations in strategic farm business decision-making: a case study of attitudinal behaviour in Scotland. Land Use Pol. 2010, 27(2):415-423.
53. Van der Ploeg Jan Douwe Styles of farming: an introductory note on concepts and methodology. Born From Within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development 1994, Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands. J.D. van der Ploeg, A. Long (Eds.).
54. Van Herzele A., Van Gossum P. Typology building for owner-specific policies and communications to advance forest conversion in small pine plantations. Landscape Urban Plan. 2008, 87:201-209.
55. Van Herzele A., Van Gossum P. Owner-specific factors associated with conversion activity in secondary pine plantations. For. Pol. Econ. 2009, 4:230-236.
56. Vidal N.G., Kozak R.A. The recent evolution of corporate responsibility practices in the forestry sector. Int. For. Rev. 2008, 10(1):1-13.
57. Villa M. Born to be farmers? Changing expectations in Norwegian farmers' life courses. Soc. Ruralis 1999, 39(3):328-342.
58. Walter G. Images of success: how illinois farmers define the successful farmer. Rural Soc. 1997, 62(1):48-68.
59. Whatmore, S. 1994. Farm Household Strategies and Styles of Farming: Assessing the utility of farm typologies, in: Jan Douwe van der Ploeg and Ann Long (Eds.), Born From Within: Practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
60. Wilson G.A., Hart K. Financial imperative or conservation concern? EU farmers' motivations for participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Environ. Plan. A 2000, 32(12):2161-2185.
61. Wilson G.A. Factors influencing farmer participation in the environmentally sensitive areas scheme. J. Environ. Man. 1997, 50:67-93.
62. Wilson G.A. From productivism to post-productivism ... and back again? Exploring the unchanged natural and mental landscapes of European Agriculture. Trans. Inst. Brit. Geograph. 2001, 26(1):77-102.
63. Wilson G.A. Towards Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective 2007, CABI Publishing.