A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 249-259

  Ingemarson, Fredrik ^a   Lindhagen, Anders ^a   Eriksson, Lennart ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Amenities; Conservation; Economic efficiency; Forest policy; Goals; Motivations; Objectives; Utilities; Values

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC POLICY; REGIONAL PLANNING;

AMENITIES; ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY; FOREST POLICY; GOALS; UTILITIES; VALUES;

FORESTRY;

FORESTRY; PLANNING; SWEDEN;

EID: 33745290213     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827580600662256     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anon. (2000). MINITAB 13:20 [Statistical software]. Minitab.
2. Bengston, D. N. & Xu, Z. (1997). Trends in national forest values among forestry professionals, environmentalists, and the news media, 1982-1993. Society and Natural Resources, 10, 43-59.
3. Bengston, D. N., Webb, T. J. & Fan, D. P. (2004). Shifting forest value orientations in the United States, 1980-2001: A computer content analysis. Environmental Values, 13, 373-392.
4. Bliss, J. C. & Martin, A. J. (1989). Identifying small-scale forest management motivations with qualitative methods. Forest Science, 35, 601-622.
5. Bliss, J. C. & Martin, A. J. (1990). How tree farmers view management incentives. Journal of Forestry, 88(8), 23-29, 42.
6. Boon, T. E., Meilby, H. & Thorsen, B. J. (2004). An empirical based typology of private forest owners in Denmark - Improving the communication between authorities and owners. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19(Suppl. 4), 45-55.
7. Dillman, D. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225-249.
8. Eriksson M. (1989a). Ägarstrukturens forändring inom privatskogsbruket i ett historiskt perspektiv [The change of ownership in private forestry from a historical perspective] (Rep. No. 5). Department of Forest Industry Market Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)
9. Hakelius, K. (1996). Cooperative values - Farmers' cooperatives in the minds of the farmers. PhD thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
10. Harrison, S., Herbohn, J. & Niskanen, A. (2002). Non-industrial, smallholder, small-scale and family forestry: What's in a name? Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 1, 1-11.
11. Hörnfeldt, R. & Ingemarson, F. (2006). Evaluation of silvicultural practices from a multipurpose perspective. Baltic Forestry, 12(1).
12. Hugosson, M. & Ingemarson, F. (2003). Depicting management ideas of private forest owners - An assessment of general trends in Sweden based on new theoretical ideas (Rep. No. 7). Department of Forest Products and Markets, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
13. Hugosson, M. & Ingemarson, F. (2004). Objectives and motivations of small-scale forest owners; theoretical modelling and qualitative assessment. Silva Fennica, 38, 217-231.
14. Ingemarson, F., Dahlin, B. & Hedman, L. (2004). Nature conservation in forest management plans for small-scale forestry in Sweden. . Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy., 3, 17-34.
15. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Kangas, J. (1992). Multiple-use planning of forest resources by using the analytic hierarchy process. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 7, 259-268.
17. Kanuk, L. & Berenson, C. (1975). Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 440-453.
18. Karppinen, H. (1998a). Objectives of non-industrial private forest owners: Differences and future trends in southern and northern Finland. Journal of Forest Economics, 4, 147-173.
19. Karppinen, H. (1998b). Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fennica, 32, 43-59.
20. Kline, J. D., Alig, R. J. & Johnson, R. L. (2000). Fostering the production of nontimber services among forest owners with heterogenous objectives. Forest Science, 46, 302-311.
21. Kurtz, W. B. & Lewis, B. J. (1981). Decision-making framework for nonindustrial private forest owners: An application in the Missouri Ozarks. Journal of Forestry, 79, 285-288.
22. Kuuluvainen, J., Karppinen, H. & Ovaskainen, V. (1996). Land-owner objectives and non-industrial private timber supply. Forest Science, 42, 300-309.
23. Lidestav, G. & Ekström, M. (2000). Introducing gender in studies on management behaviour among non-industrial private forest owners. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 15, 378-386.
24. Lidestav, G. & Nordfjell, T. (2002). Med skogsägaren i fokus [With the forest owner in focus]. Stockholm: LRF Skogsägarna. (In Swedish.)
25. Löfgren, C. (1989b). Privatskogsbrukets ekonomi - Resultat av en enkätundersökning. Del 2. De privata skogsägarnas kunskaper och äsikter om skogsekonomi [The private forest owners' knowledge and views about forest economy] (Arbetsrapport 92). Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)
26. Löfgren, C. (1989c). Privatskogsbrukets ekonomi - Resultat av en enkätundersökning. Del 3. De privata skogsägarnas kunskaper och äsikter om skogsvärdslagen [The private forest owners knowledge and views about the forestry law] (Arbetsrapport 94). Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)
27. Löfgren, C. (1992). De privata skogsägarna och skattereformen [The private forest owners and the taxation reform] (Rep. No. 100). Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)
28. Lönnstedt, L. (1989). Goals and cutting decisions of private small forest owners. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 4, 259-265.
29. Lönnstedt, L. (1997). Non-industrial private forest owners' decision process: A qualitative study about goals, time perspective, opportunities and alternatives. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 12, 302-310.
30. Martin, C. L. (1994). The impact of topic interest on mail survey response behaviour. Journal of Market Research Society, 36, 327-338.
31. Marty, T. D., Kurtz, W. B. & Gramann, J. H. (1988). PNIF owner attitudes in the midwest: A case study in Missouri and Wisconsin. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 5, 194-197.
32. Mattson, L., Boman, M., Kindstrand, C. (2004). Privatägd skog: Värden, visioner och forskningsbehov [Private owned forest: Values, visions and research requirements]. SUFOR. Lund: Brattåsstiftelsen. (In Swedish.)
33. National Board of Forestry (1994). Handbook of the Forestry Act. Jönköping: National Board of Forestry.
34. National Board of Forestry (2003). Statistical yearbook of forestry 2003. Jönköping: National Board of Forestry.
35. Pietarinen, J. (1987). Ihminen ja metsä: Neljä perusasennetta [Summary: Man and the forest: Four basic attitudes]. Silva Fennica, 21, 323-331.
36. Pregernig, M. (2001). Values of forestry professionals and their implications for the applicability of policy instruments. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 278-288.
37. van Raaij, F. W. F. (1993). Postmodern consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 541-563.
38. Sennblad, G. (1988b). Drivnings och skogsvårdsundersökning inom privatskogsbruket 1984. D. 2, Privata skogsägare och deras brukningsenheter i Sverige 1984 [Private forest owners and their holdings in Sweden 1984] (Rep. No. 176). Department of Operational Efficiency, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)
39. Sennblad G. (1990). De privata skogsägarnas mål för sitt skogsinnehav [The aim of the non-industrial private forest owners for their forest holdings] (Research Notes No. 185). Department of Operational Efficiency, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)
40. Sennblad, G. (1996). En analys av privata skogsägares avverkningsbeteende [An analysis of the logging behavior of non-industrial private forest owners in Sweden] (Research Notes No. 293). Department of Operational Efficiency, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)
41. Sennblad, G. (1998). Privatskogsbrukets behov av skogliga kunskaper [The need for forestry knowledge in the non-industrial private forestry] (Research Notes No. 311). Department of Operational Efficiency, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)
42. Törnqvist, T. (1995). Skogsrikets arvingar. En sociologisk Studie av skogsägarskapet inom privat, enskilt skogsbruk [A sociological study of the ownership in private forestry] (SAMU No. 6). (In Swedish.)