Applying experience sampling methods to partner violence research: Safety and feasibility in a 90-day study of community women

Violence Against Women

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 251-266

  Sullivan, Tami P ^a   Khondkaryan, Enna ^b   Santos, Nancy P ^a   Peters, Erica N ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Division of Prevention and Community Research   (United States)

Author keywords

experience sampling method; feasibility; partner violence; research methods; safety

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PARTNER VIOLENCE; RAPE; SAFETY; SEXUALITY; VICTIM;

ADULT; CRIME VICTIMS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RAPE; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAFETY; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SPOUSE ABUSE;

EID: 79751501444     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801210397756     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Black, M.C., Kresnow, M.-J., Simon, T.R., Arias, I., & Shelley, G. (2006). Telephone survey respondents' reactions to questions regarding interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 21, 445-459.
2. Campbell, R., Adams, A.E., Wasco, S.M., Ahrens, C.E., & Sefl, T. (2010). What has it been like for you to talk with me today? The impact of participating in interview research on rape survivors. Violence Against Women, 16, 60-83.
3. Carlson, E.B., Newman, E., Daniels, J.W., Armstrong, J., Roth, D., & Loewenstein, R. (2003). Distress in response to and perceived usefulness of trauma research interviews. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 4, 131-142.
4. Clements, K., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2009). Participation in laboratory research results in emotional distress with one's partner: Comparing violent and nonviolent couples (10.1007/ s10896-009-9229-4). Journal of Family Violence, 24, 283-295.
5. Corkrey, R., & Parkinson, L. (2002). A comparison of four computer-based telephone interviewing methods: Getting answers to sensitive questions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 354-363.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 175, 526-536.
7. Garcia-Moreno, C. (2002). Dilemmas and opportunities for an appropriate health-service response to violence against women. Lancet, 359, 1509.
8. Griffin, M.G., Resick, P.A., Waldrop, A.E., & Mechanic, M.B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 221-227.
9. Hektner, J.M., Schmidt, J., A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
10. Khantzian, E.J. (1997). The self-medication hypothesis of substance use disorders: A reconsideration and recent applications. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 4, 231-244.
11. Khantzian, E.J. (2003). The self-medication hypothesis revisited: The dually diagnosed patient. Primary Psychiatry, 10(9), 47-48, 53-54.
12. Langford, D.R. (2000). Developing a safety protocol in qualitative research involving battered women. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 133-142.
13. Newman, E., & Kaloupek, D.G. (2004). The risks and benefits of participating in traumafocused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 383-394.
14. Newman, E., Walker, E.A., & Gefland, A. (1999). Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21, 187-196.
15. Robinson, W.S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357.
16. Rosenbaum, A., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2006). Meta-research on violence and victims: The impact of data collection methods on findings and participants. Violence and Victims, 21, 404-409.
17. Rosenbaum, A., Rabenhorst, M.M., Reddy, M.K., Fleming, M.T., & Howells, N.L. (2003, July). A comparison of methods for collecting self-report data on sensitive topics. Paper presented at the 8th International Family Violence Research Conference, Portsmouth, New Hampshire.
18. Searles, J.S., Helzer, J.E., & Walter, D.E. (2000). Comparison of drinking patterns measured by daily reports and timeline follow back. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 277-286.
19. Searles, J.S., Perrine, M.W., Mundt, J.C., & Helzer, J.E. (1995). Self-report of drinking using touch-tone telephone: Extending the limits of reliable daily contact. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 375-382.
20. Sobell, L.C., & Sobell, M.B. (1995). Alcohol Timeline Followback users' manual. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation.
21. Stone, A.A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 236-243.
22. Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Alienza, A. A., & Nebeling, L. (Eds.). (2007). The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D.B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
24. Todd, M., Armeli, S., Tennen, H., Carney, M.A., & Affleck, G. (2003). A daily diary validity test of drinking to cope measures. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 303-311.
25. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2001). Census 2000 Summary File 1/ Connecticut. Washington, DC: Author.
26. Walker, E.A., Newman, E., Koss, M.P., & Bernstein, D. (1997). Does the study of victimization revictimize the victims? General Hospital Psychiatry, 19, 403-410.