Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research

General Hospital Psychiatry

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 187-196

  Newman, Elana ^a   Walker, Edward A ^b   Gefland, Anne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUSE; ADULT; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; VICTIM;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; FEMALES; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISKS AND BENEFITS; SURVEY; WASHINGTON;

ADULT; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRESS DISORDERS, POST-TRAUMATIC;

EID: 0032998123     PISSN: 01638343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0163-8343(99)00011-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Newman E, Kaloupek DG, Keane TM, Folstein S: Ethical decision making among trauma researchers (pp. 271-281) In Kantor GK (ed), Out of the Darkness: Contemporary Perspectives on Family Violence. Newbury Park, CA; Sage Press, 1997
2. Bergen RK: Interviewing survivors of marital rape: doing feminist research on sensitive topics. In Renzetti C.M. Lees RM (eds), Researching Sensitive Topics. Newbury Park, CA; Sage Press, 1993, pp 197-211
3. Keith-Speigel P: Children's rights as participants in research In Koocher GP (ed), Children's Rights and the Mental Health Professions. New York: Wiley, 1976, pp 53-82
4. Kinard M: Ethical issues in research with abused children. Child Abuse Negl 9:301-311, 1985
5. Levine M: Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. Baltimore, Urban & Schwarsenberg, 1981
6. Department of Health and Human Services. Final regulations amending basic HHS policy for the protection of human research subjects. Federal Register, 1981, 46, 8366-8391 (codified as 45 C.F.R. pt. 46)
7. Stanley B, Sieber JE, Melton GB (eds), Research Ethics: A Psychological Approach. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1996
8. Stanley B, Sieber JE, Melton GB: Empirical studies of ethical issues in research. A research agenda. Am Psychol 42:735-741, 1987
9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed, Washington, DC: 1994
10. Ceci SJ, Peters D, Plotkin J: Human subjects review: personal values, and the regulation of social science research. Am Psychol 40(9):994-1002, 1985
11. Walker EA, Newman E, Koss M, Bernstein D: Does the study of victimization revictimize research participants? Gen Hosp Psychiatry 19:403-410, 1997
12. Dillman DA: Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York, Wiley, 1978
13. Walker EA, Gelfand A, Katon W, et al: Adult health status of women HMO members with histories of childhood abuse and neglect (in press)
14. Bernstein DP, Fink L: Childhood Trauma Questionnaire: A Retrospective Self-Report. San Antonio, TX, The Psychological Corporation, 1998
15. Bernstein DP, Fink L, Handelsman L, et al: Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect. Am J Psychiatry 151:1132-1136, 1994
16. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane TM: The PTSD Checklist: Description, Use, and Psychometric Properties. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, Texas, 1994
17. Blanchard EB, Jones Alexander J, Buckley TC, Forneris CA: Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behav Res Ther 34:669-673, 1996
18. Newman EN, Kaloupek DG: Reactions to Research Participation Questionnaire. Unpublished measure (available from E. Newman, University of Tulsa, Department of Psychology-Lorton Hall 308, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74104