The big, the rich, and the powerful: Physical, financial, and social dimensions of dominance in mating and attraction

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 365-382

  Bryan, Angela D ^a   Webster, Gregory D ^b   Mahaffey, Amanda L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c INSTITUTO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE LISBOA ISCTE IUL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Agreeableness; Attraction; Attractiveness; Dominance; Evolutionary psychology

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTHORITY; BEHAVIOR; COURTSHIP; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LOVE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUTHORITARIANISM; BEAUTY; COURTSHIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LOVE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79751490856     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167210395604     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Ackerman, R.A., Donnellan, M.B., & Kashy, D.A. (2011). Working with dyadic data in studies of emerging adulthood: Specific recommendations, general advice, and practical tips. In F. Fincham & M. Cui (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 67-98). New York Cambridge University Press.
2. Baker, R.R., & Bellis, M.A. (1995). Human sperm competition. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
3. Bentler, P.M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4. Betzig, L.L. (1986). Despotism and differential reproduction: A Darwinian view of history. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
5. Botwin, M., Buss, D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107-136.
6. Braun, M., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 805-819.
7. Buss, D.M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses testing in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
8. Buss, D.M. (1991). Conflict in married couples: Personality predictors of anger and upset. Journal of Personality, 59, 663-688.
9. Buss, D.M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M.,... Yang, K.-S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47.
10. Buss, D.M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
11. Buss, D.M., & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
12. Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B.P. (2001). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival's body build. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 335-341.
13. Eastwick, P.W., & Finkel, E.J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245-264.
14. Ellis, B. (1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267-288). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15. Ellis, L. (1995). Dominance and reproductive success among non-human animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 257-333.
16. Fletcher, G.J.O., & Simpson, J.A. (2000). Ideal standards in close relationships: Their structure and functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 102-105.
17. Fletcher, G., Simpson, J., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340-354.
18. Fletcher, G.J.O., Tither, J.M., O'Loughlin, C., Friesen, M., & Overall, N. (2004). Warm and homely or cold and beautiful? Sex differences in trading off traits in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 659-672.
19. Franzoi, S.L., & Hertzog, M.E. (1987). Judging physical attractiveness: What body aspects do we use? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 19-33.
20. Frisch, R.E., & McArthur, J.W. (1974). Menstrual cycles: Fatness as determinant of minimum weight necessary for their maintenance and onset. Science, 185, 554-556.
21. Galton, F. (1879). Composite portraits, made by combining those of many different persons in a single resultant figure. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 8, 132-144.
22. Gangestad, S.W., & Simpson, J.A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-587.
23. Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: A model and its implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 402-416.
24. Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 344-371). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
25. Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R.A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 73-85.
26. Garver-Apgar, C., Gangestad, S., Thornhill, R., Miller, R., & Olp, J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830-835.
27. Gillis, J.S., & Avis, W.E. (1980). The male-taller norm in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 396-401.
28. Grammer, K., Fink, B., Juette, A., Ronzal, G., & Thornhill, R. (2002). Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 91-125). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
29. Gray, P.B., Kahlenber, S.M., Barrett, E.S., Lipson, S.F., & Ellison, P.T. (2002). Marriage and fatherhood are associated with lower testosterone in males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 193-201.
30. Graziano, W.G., Jensen-Campbell, L.A., Todd, M., & Finch, J.F. (1997). Interpersonal attraction from an evolutionary psychology perspective: Women's reactions to dominant and prosocial men. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 141-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Greiling, H., & Buss, D.M. (2000). Women's sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929-963.
32. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F.J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165-196.
33. Hillson, S. (1996). Dental anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Hinsz, V.B., Matz, D.C., & Patience, R.A. (2001). Does women's hair signal reproductive potential? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 166-172.
35. Horvarth, T. (1979). Correlates of physical beauty in men and women. Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 145-151.
36. Hughes, S.M., & Gallup, G.G. (2002). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173-178.
37. Jensen-Campbell, L.A., Graziano, W.G., & West, S.G. (1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: Do nice guys really finish last? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427-440.
38. Judd, C.M., McClelland, G.H., & Ryan, C.S. (2009). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
39. Judge, T.A., & Cable, D.M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428-441.
40. Kashy, D.A., & Donnellan, M.B. (in press). Conceptual and methodological issues in the analysis of data from dyads and groups. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
42. Kenrick, D.T., Neuberg, S.L., Zierk, K.L., & Krones, J.M. (1994). Evolution and social cognition: Contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 210-217.
43. Kinsey, A.C., Pomeroy, W.B., Martin, C.E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
44. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
45. Langlois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121.
46. Li, N.P., Bailey, M.J., Kenrick, D.T., & Linsenmeier, J.A.W. (2002). The necessities and luxury of mate preferences: Testing the trade offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955.
47. Li, N.P., & Kenrick, D.T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489.
48. Locke, K.D. (2000). Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249-267.
49. Manning, J.T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G.H., & Leinster, S.J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 223-236.
50. McCann, S.J. (2001). Height, societal threat, and the victory margin in presidential elections (1824-1992). Psychological Reports, 88, 741-742.
51. Møller, A.P., Soler, M., & Thornhill, R. (1995). Breast asymmetry, sexual selection and human reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 207-219.
52. Montepare, J.M., Zebrowitz, M., & McArthur, L. (1988). Impressions of people created by age-related qualities and their gates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 547-556.
53. Penton-Voak, I.S., Little, A.C., Jones, B.C., Burt, D.M., Tiddeman, B.P., & Perrett, D. (2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 264-271.
54. Perilloux, H.K., Webster, G.D., & Gaulin, S.J.C. (2010). Signals of genetic quality and maternal investment capacity: The dynamic effects of fluctuating asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio on men's ratings of women's attractiveness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 34-42.
55. Perusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267-322.
56. Regan, P.C. (1998). What if you can't get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294-1303.
57. Rubenstein, A.J., Langlois, J.H., & Kalakanis, L.E. (1999). Infant preferences for attractive faces: A cognitive explanation. Developmental Psychology, 35, 848-855.
58. Sadalla, E.K., Kenrick, D.T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730-738.
59. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
60. Singh, D. (1995). Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 465-481.
61. Stevenage, S.V., Nixon, M.S., & Vince, K. (1999). Visual analysis of gait as a cue to identity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 513-526.
62. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63. Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerson (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80-118). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S.W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269.
65. Tovée, M.J., & Cornelissen, P.L. (1999). The mystery of female beauty. Nature, 399, 215-216.
66. Tovée, M.J., Reinhardt, S., Emery, J.L., & Cornelissen, P.L. (1998). Optimal BMI and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet, 352, 548.
67. Townsend, J.M. (1993). Sexuality and partner selection: Sex differences among college students. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 305-329.
68. Townsend, J.M., & Wasserman, T. (1998). Sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in assessment and criteria. Evolution of Human Behavior, 19, 171-191.
69. Watson, P.J., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 21-25.