Signals of Genetic Quality and Maternal Investment Capacity: The Dynamic Effects of Fluctuating Asymmetry and Waist-to-Hip Ratio on Men's Ratings of Women's Attractiveness

Social Psychological and Personality Science

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 34-42

  Perilloux, Helen K ^a   Webster, Gregory D ^b   Gaulin, Steven J C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

attractiveness; body mass index; evolutionary psychology; fluctuating asymmetry; waist to hip ratio

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955566273     PISSN: 19485506     EISSN: 19485514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1948550609349514     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Bjorntorp, P. (1988). The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution, and disease. Acta Medica Scandinavica, 723(Suppl.), 121-134.
3. Braun, M., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 805-819.
4. Brown, W.M., Price, M.E., Kang, J., Pound, N., Zhao, Y., & Yu, H. (2008). Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 12938-12943.
5. Folsom, A.R., Kaye, S.A., Sellers, T.A., Hong, C.P., Cerhan, J.R., Potter, J.D.,et al.(1993). Body fat distribution and 5-year risk of death in older women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269, 483-487.
6. Furnham, A., McClelland, A., & Omer, L. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ratings of perceived fecundity and sexual attractiveness as a function of body weight and waist-to-hip ratio. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 8, 219-230.
7. Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Baguma, P. (2002). A cross-cultural study on the role of weight and waist-to-hip ratio on female attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 729-745.
8. Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 539-549.
9. Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extra-pair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69-88.
10. Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R.A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 73-85.
11. Gomi, A. (1998). Americans 1.0, Los Angeles 1994 [CD-ROM]. Bunkasha, Japan: Digitalogue.
12. Grammar, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233-242.
13. Hamilton, W.D. (1980). Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos, 35, 282-290.
14. Hamilton, W.D., & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites. Science, 218, 384-387.
15. Henss, R. (1991). Perceiving age and attractiveness in facial photographs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 933-946.
16. Kaye, S.A., Folsom, A.R., Prineas, R.J., Potter, J.D., & Gapstur, S.M. (1990). The association of body fat distribution with lifestyle and reproductive factors in a population study of postmenopausal women. International Journal of Obesity, 14, 583-591.
17. Kowner, R. (2001). Psychological perspective on human developmental stability and fluctuating asymmetry: Sources, applications and implications. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 447-469.
18. Langlois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121.
19. Lassek, W.D., & Gaulin, S.J.C. (2008). Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources? Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 26-34.
20. MacKinnon, D.P., Krull, J.L., & Lockwood, C.M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
21. Manning, J.T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G.H., & Leinster, S. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 1-13.
22. Martin, S.M., Manning, J.T., & Dowrick, C.F. (1999). Fluctuating asymmetry, relative digit length, and depression in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 203-214.
23. Milne, B.J., Belsky, J., Poulton, R., Thomson, W.M., Caspi, A., & Kieser, J. (2003). Fluctuating asymmetry and physical health among young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 53-63.
24. Møller, A.P. (1992a). Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature, 357, 238-240.
25. Møller, A.P. (1992b). Parasites differentially increase the degree of fluctuating asymmetry in secondary sexual characteristics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 5, 691-699.
26. Møller, A.P. (1997). Developmental stability and fitness: A review. American Naturalist, 149, 916-932.
27. Møller, A.P. (1999). Asymmetry as a predictor of growth, fecundity, and survival. Ecology Letters, 2, 149-156.
28. Møller, A.P., & Swaddle, J.P. (1997). Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Møller, A.P., & Thornhill, R. (1997). A meta-analysis of the heritability of developmental stability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10, 1-16.
30. Nezlek, J.B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event and interval contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771-785.
31. Perrett, D.I., Burt, D.M., Penton-Voak, I.S., Lee, K.J., Rowland, D.A., & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 295-307.
32. Qazi, R., Wilson, G.D., & Abrahams, S. (2004). Developmental instability is associated with neurocognitive performance in heterosexual and homosexual men, but not in women. Behavioral Neuroscience, 118, 243-247.
33. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Cheong, Y.F., & Congdon, R.T., Jr. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
35. Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-236.
36. Scheib, J.E., Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 1913-1917.
37. Scutt, D., Manning, J., Whitehouse, G., Leinster, S., & Massey, C. (1997). The relationship between breast asymmetry, breast size and the occurrence of breast cancer. British Journal of Radiology, 70, 1017-1021.
38. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
39. Singh, D. (1995). Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationship: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 465-481.
40. Singh, D., & Luis, S. (1994). Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of WHR on judgment of women's attractiveness. Human Nature, 6, 51-65.
41. Singh, D., & Randall, P.K. (2007). Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: Waist-hip ratio (WHR) and women's attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 483-507.
42. Singh, D., & Young, R. (1995). Body weight, WHR, breasts and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483-507.
43. Streeter, S.A., & McBurney, D.H. (2003). Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness: New evidence and a critique of "a critical test. " Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 88-98.
44. Sugiyama, L.S. (2005). Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 292-343). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
45. Swaddle, J.P., & Cuthill, I.C. (1994). Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches. Nature, 367, 165-166.
46. Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerson (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80-118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Tassinary, L.G., & Hansen, K.A. (1998). A critical test of the waist-to-hip-ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychological Science, 9, 150-155.
48. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S.W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269.
49. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S.W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5, 297-302.
50. Thornhill, R., & Møller, A.P. (1997). Developmental stability, disease, and medicine. Biological Reviews, 72, 497-548.
51. Tovée, M., & Cornelissen, P. (2001). Female and male perception of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 391-402.
52. Tovée, M.J., Maisey, D.S., Emery, J.L., & Cornelissen, P.L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 211-218.
53. Tovée, M.J., Tasker, K., & Benson, P.J. (2000). Is symmetry a visual cue to attractiveness in the human female body? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 191-200.
54. Van Dongen, S. (2006). Fluctuating asymmetry and developmental instability in evolutionary biology: Past, present and future. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 1727-1743.
55. Van Valen, L. (1962). A study of fluctuating symmetry. Evolution, 16, 125-142.
56. Webster, G.D. (2008). Playboy playmates, the Dow Jones, consumer sentiment, 9/11, and the Doomsday Clock: A critical examination of the environmental security hypothesis. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 23-41.
57. Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2005). Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 635-653.
58. Yu, D.W., & Shepard, G.H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321-322.
59. Yzerbyt, V., Muller, D., & Judd, C.M. (2004). Adjusting researchers' approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 424-431.
60. Zaadstra, B.M., Seidell, J.C., Van Noord, P.A., te Velde, E.R., Habbema, J.D., Vrieswijk, B.,et al.(1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. British Medical Journal, 306, 484-487.