Ethical principles associated with the publication of research in asha's scholarly journals: Importance and adequacy of coverage

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Ingham, Janis C ^a   Minifie, Fred D ^b   Horner, Jennifer ^c   Robey, Randall R ^d   Lansing, Charissa ^e   McCartney, James H ^f   Slater, Sarah C ^g   Moss, Sharon E ^g,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^f CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g AMERICAN SPEECH LANGUAGE HEARING ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^h DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

Author keywords

Publication ethics; Publication policy; Research ethics; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; HEARING DISORDER; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; INTERNET; LANGUAGE DISORDERS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 79551695592     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0260)     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2000). The role and activities of scientific societies in promoting research integrity (A Report of a Conference,Washington, DC, April 10). Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/spp/ sfrl/ projects /integrity/integrity.htm.
2. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2003). Code of ethics. ASHA Supplement, 23, 13-15. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/ html/ET2003-00166.html.
4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Editor's handbook online [Manual]. Rockville, MD: Author.
5. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007). Guidelines for the responsible conduct of research: Ethics and the publication process. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/html/GL2007-00282.html.
6. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Instructions for authors. Retrieved from http://journals.Asha.org/misc/ifora.dtl.
7. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Information for reviewers. Retrieved from http://journals.Asha.org/misc/ifora.dtl.
8. Browne, M. W. (1989, May 3). Physicists debunk claims of a new kind of fusion. New York Times. Retrieved from http://partners.nytimes.com/library/ national/science/ 050399sci-cold-fusion.html.
9. Committee on Publication Ethics. (1999). Guidelines on good publication practice: The COPE report. London, England: BMJ Publishing Group.
10. Horner, J.,& Minifie, F. D. (2011a). Research ethics I: Responsible conduct of research (RCR)-Historical and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(Suppl.), S303-S329.
11. Horner, J.,& Minifie, F. D. (2011b). Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(Suppl.), S330-S345.
12. Horner, J.,& Minifie, F. D. (2011c). Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(Suppl.), S346-S362.
13. Hunter, J. M. (2000). Editorial I. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 85, 341-343.
14. Ingham, R. J., Fox, P. T., Ingham, J. C., Zamarripa, F., Martin, C., Jerabek, P.,& Cotton, J. (1996). Functionallesion investigation of developmental stuttering with Positron Emission Tomography. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1208-1227.
15. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2008). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. Retrieved from http://www.icmje.org/index. html.
16. Iverson, M., Frankel, M. S.,& Siang, S. (2003). Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they doing and how well are they doing it? Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 141-158. Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.jnrbm.com/info/about. (Pubitemid 37130474)
17. Kazdin, A. E. (1998). Research design in clinical psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn& Bacon.
18. Kolata,G. (2009, June 27). Grant systemleads cancer researchers to play it safe.New York Times. Retrieved fromhttp://www.Nytimes.com/2009/06/28/health/ research/28cancer.html.
19. Macrina, F. L. (2007). Scientific society and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: Codes, policies, and education. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 865-869. (Pubitemid 47339817)
20. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S.,& de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737-738. (Pubitemid 40839708)
21. McCartney, J. (2002). ASHA code of ethics and research. The ASHA leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/practice/ ethics/research-ethics.htm.
22. Minifie, F. D., Robey, R. R., Horner, J., Ingham, J. C., Lansing, C., McCartney, J. H., Moss, S. E. (2011). Responsible conduct of research in communication sciences and disorders: Faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(Suppl.), S363-S393.
23. Moss, S. E. (2011). Research integrity in communication sciences and disorders: Preface. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(Suppl.), S300-S302.
24. Moss, S. E., Alldredge, E.-E., Garstecki, D., Horner, J., Ingham, J., Jeffries, M., Slater, S. (2003, November). Research ethics in graduate education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language- Hearing Association, Chicago, IL.
25. Moss, S. E., Alldredge, E.-E., Garstecki, D., Horner, J., Ingham, J., Jeffries, M.,Slater, S. (2004a, November). Research integrity in ASHA: Teaching and learning practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.
26. Moss, S. E., Alldredge, E.-E., Garstecki, D., Horner, J., Ingham, J., Jeffries, M.,Slater, S. (2004b, November). Research integrity in ASHA: Educational practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity, San Diego, CA.
27. Moss, S. E., Alldredge, E.-E., Garstecki, D., Horner, J., Ingham, J., Lansing, C., . . . Slater, S. (2005a, March). Research integrity: A survey of ASHA's education and publication practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders, Scottsdale, AZ.
28. Moss, S. E., Alldredge, E.-E., Garstecki, D., Horner, J., Ingham, J., Lansing, C., Slater, S. (2005b, November). Responsible conduct of research: Faculty and student perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Diego, CA.
29. Moss,S.E., Garstecki,D.,Horner, J., Ingham, J., Jessen, J., Lansing, C., Slater, S. (2006, December). Research integrity in ASHA: Scientific publication practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity, Safety Harbor, FL.
30. National Institutes of Health. (n.d.). NIH roadmap for medical research: NIH Director's Pioneer Award (2004). Retrieved from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/ pioneer/index.Aspx.
31. Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Requirements for institutional policies and procedures on research misconduct under the new PHS policies on research misconduct-42 CFR Part 93. Retrieved from http://ori.hhs.gov/documents/requirmnts.pdf.
32. Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Requirements for institutional policies and procedures on research misconduct under the new PHS policies on research misconduct-42 CFR Part 93. Retrieved from http://ori.hhs.gov/documents/requirmnts.pdf.
33. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005). Public Health Service policies on research misconduct (final rule). Federal Register, 70, 28370-28400.
34. Rennie, D.,& Gunsalus, C. K. (2001). Regulations on scientific misconduct: Lessons from the U.S. experience. In S. Lock, F. Wells,& M. Farthing ( Eds.), Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research (3rd ed., pp. 13-31). London, England: BMJ Books.
35. Robey, R. R.,& Dalebout, S. D. (1998). A tutorial on conducting meta-analyses of clinical outcome research. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1227-1241. (Pubitemid 28563610)
36. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and the tolerance for future null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
37. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
38. Steneck, N. H. (2006). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Retrieved from http://ori.dhhs.gov/ education/products/RCRintro.