Do predictions of visual perception aid design?

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Rosenholtz, Ruth ^a   Dorai, Amal ^b   Freeman, Rosalind ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SKIDMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clutter; Design tool; Field study; Human computer interaction; Saliency; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

CLUTTER; DESIGN TOOL; FIELD STUDY; SALIENCY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

CLUTTER (INFORMATION THEORY); COMPUTER VISION; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; USER INTERFACES; VISION; VISUALIZATION;

DESIGN;

EID: 79551673696     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1870076.1870080     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ADAMCZYK, P. D. AND TWIDALE, M. B. 2007. Supporting multidisciplinary collaboration: requirements from novel HCI education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07). ACM, New York, 1073-1076.
2. ADLER, A. AND DAVIS, R. 2004. Speech and sketching for multimodal design. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, New York, 214-216.
3. ANSTIS, S. 1998. Picturing peripheral acuity. Perception 27, 817-825.
4. BALAS, B. J., NAKANO, L. M., AND ROSENHOLTZ, R. A statistical model of peripheral vision predicts visual crowding. J. Vision 9, 12, 13, 1-18.
5. BøDKER S., NIELSEN, C., AND PETERSEN, M. G. 2000. Creativity, cooperation and interactive design. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practises, Methods, and Techniques (DIS'00). ACM, New York, 252-261.
6. BRAVO, M. J. AND FARID, H. 2008. A scale invariant measure of clutter. J. V ision 8, 23, 1-9.
7. BUCCIARELLI, L. L. 1988. An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Des. Studies 9, 159-168.
8. BRUCE, N. D. B. AND TSOTSOS, J. K. 2009. Saliency, attention, and visual search: An information theoretic approach. J. V ision, 9(3):5, 1-24.
9. CLEVELAND, W. 1980. The Elements of Graphing Data. Wadsworth, Monterey, CA.
10. HAMMOND, T. AND DAVIS, R. 2005. LADDER, a sketching language for user interface developers. Comput. Graphics 28, 518-532.
11. HENDERSON, K. 1995. The visual culture of engineers. In The Cultures of Computing, Star, S. L. Ed., Wiley-Blackwell, New York.
12. HENDRY, D. G. 2004. Communication functions and the adaptation of design representations in interdisciplinary teams. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practises, Methods, and Techniques (DIS'04). ACM, New York, 123-132.
13. ITTI, L., KOCH, C., AND NIEBUR, E. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal, Mach. Intell. 20, 11, 1254-1259.
14. KOSSLYN, S. M. 1989. Understanding charts and graphs. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 3, 185-225.
15. LANDAY, J. A. AND MYERS, B. A. 2001. Sketching interfaces: Toward more human interface design. IEEE Comput. 34, 3, 56-64.
16. LOHRENZ, M. C. AND GENDRON, M. L. 2008. A 3D clustering algorithm to model clutter in electronic geospatial displays. J. Manage. Eng. Integr. 1, 83-88.
17. MACKINLAY, J. D. 1988. Applying a theory of graphical presentation to the graphic design of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software (UIST'88). ACM, New York, 179-189.
18. NEWMAN, M. W., LIN, J., HONG, J. I., AND LANDAY, J. A. 2003. DENIM: An informal web site design tool inspired by observations of practice. Hum. Comput. Interact. 18, 3, 259-324.
19. PARIS, S. 2008. Edge-preserving smoothing and mean-shift segmentation of video streams. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer Vision Part II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 460-473.
20. TORRALBA, A., OLIVA, A., CASTELHANO, M., AND HENDERSON, J. M. 2006. Contextual guidance of attention in natural scenes: The role of global features on object search. Psychol. Rev. 113, 4, 766-786.
21. ROSENHOLTZ, R. 1999. A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena. Vision Res. 39, 3157-3163.
22. ROSENHOLTZ, R. 2001a. Visual search for orientation among heterogeneous distractors: Experimental results and implications for signal detection theory models of search. J. Exp. Psych. 27, 4, 985-999.
23. ROSENHOLTZ, R. 2001b. Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? Percept. Psychophys. 63, 3, 476-489.
24. ROSENHOLTZ, R., NAGY, A. L., AND BELL, N. R. 2004. The effect of background color on asymmetries in color search. J. Vision, 4, 3, 224-240.
25. ROSENHOLTZ, R. AND JIN, Z. 2005. A computational form of the statistical saliency model for visual search (abstract). J. Vision 5, 8, 777a.
26. ROSENHOLTZ, R., LI, Y., MANSFIELD, J., AND JIN, Z. 2005. Feature congestion, a measure of display clutter. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'05). ACM, New York, 761-770.
27. ROSENHOLTZ, R., LI, Y., AND NAKANO, L. 2007. Measuring visual clutter. J. Vision 7, 2, 1-22.
28. ROSENHOLTZ, R., TWAROG, N. R., SCHINKEL-BIELEFELD, N., AND WATTENBERG, M. 2009. An intuitive model of perceptual grouping for HCI design. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). ACM, New York, 1331-1340.
29. SHI, J. AND MALIK, J. 1997. Normalized cuts and image segmentations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'97). IEEE, los Alamitos, CA, 731-737.
30. SONNENWALD, D. H. 1996. Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Des. Stud. 17, 3, 277-301.
31. SINHA, A. K. AND LANDAY, J. A. 2001. Visually prototyping perceptual user interfaces through multimodal storyboarding. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Perceptive User Interfaces (PUI'01). ACM, New York, 1-4.
32. STAGGERS, N. 1993. Impact of screen density on clinical nurses' computer task performance and subjective screen satisfaction. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 39, 775-792.
33. STAR, S. L. 1989. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence 3, M. Hubs and L. Gasser Eds., Morgan Kaufmann, Menlo Park, CA.
34. TUFTE, E. R. 1990. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
35. VAN den BERG, R., CORNELISSEN, F. W., AND ROERDINK, J. B. T. M. 2009. A crowding model of visual clutter. J. Vision 9, 4, 1-11
36. WAGNER, I. 2000. Persuasive artifacts in architectural design and planning. In Proceedings of Co-Designing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 379-390.
37. WARE, C. 2004. Information visualization: Perception for Design. Elsevier, San Francisco.
38. WATTENBERG, M. AND FISHER, D. 2004. Analyzing perceptual organization in information graphics. Inf. Visual 3, 123-133.
39. WHARTON, C., RIEMAN, J., LEWIS, C., AND POLSON, P. 1994. The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. In Usability Inspection Methods, J. Nielsen and R. Mack Eds., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 105-140.
40. WOLFE, J. M. 2007. Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress with a model of visual search. In Integrated Models of Cognitive System, W. Gray Ed., Oxford, Oxford, UK. 99-119.
41. ZHAOPING, L. 2002. A saliency map in primary visual cortex. Trends Cognitive Sci. 6, 1, 9-16.