Sensing and modulation of invadopodia across a wide range of rigidities

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 573-582

  Parekh, Aron ^a   Ruppender, Nazanin S ^b   Branch, Kevin M ^a   Sewell Loftin, M K ^b   Lin, Jun ^b   Boyer, Patrick D ^b   Candiello, Oseph E ^c   Merryman, W David ^b   Guelcher, Scott A ^b   Weaver, Alissa M ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PA 15260   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551667287     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3733     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Rowe, R. G., and S. J. Weiss. 2008. Breaching the basement membrane: who, when and how? Trends Cell Biol. 18:560-574.
2. Kalluri, R. 2003. Basement membranes: structure, assembly and role in tumour angiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 3:422-433.
3. Paszek, M. J., N. Zahir, V. M. Weaver. 2005. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 8:241-254.
4. Provenzano, P. P., D. R. Inman, P. J. Keely. 2008. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Med. 6:11.
5. Provenzano, P. P., D. R. Inman, P. J. Keely. 2009. Matrix densityinduced mechanoregulation of breast cell phenotype, signaling and gene expression through a FAK-ERK linkage. Oncogene. 28:4326-4343.
6. Vacek, P. M., and B. M. Geller. 2004. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 13:715-722.
7. Boyd, N. F., J. M. Rommens, A. D. Paterson. 2005. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 6:798-808.
8. Alexander, N. R., K. M. Branch, A. M. Weaver. 2008. Extracellular matrix rigidity promotes invadopodia activity. Curr. Biol. 18:1295-1299.
9. Weaver, A. M. 2008. Invadopodia. Curr. Biol. 18: R362-R364.
10. Parekh, A., and A. M. Weaver. 2009. Regulation of cancer invasiveness by the physical extracellular matrix environment. Cell Adh. Migr. 3:288-292.
11. Sabeh, F., R. Shimizu-Hirota, and S. J. Weiss. 2009. Proteasedependent versus-independent cancer cell invasion programs: threedimensional amoeboid movement revisited. J. Cell Biol. 185:11-19.
12. Hotary, K., X. Y. Li, S. J. Weiss. 2006. A cancer cell metalloprotease triad regulates the basement membrane transmigration program. Genes Dev. 20:2673-2686.
13. Akgül, B., R. García-Escudero, A. Storey. 2005. The E7 protein of cutaneous human papillomavirus type 8 causes invasion of human keratinocytes into the dermis in organotypic cultures of skin. Cancer Res. 65:2216-2223.
14. McDaniel, S. M., K. K. Rumer, P. Schedin. 2006. Remodeling of the mammary microenvironment after lactation promotes breast tumor cell metastasis. Am. J. Pathol. 168:608-620.
15. Badylak, S. F. 2004. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transpl. Immunol. 12:367-377.
16. Brown, B., K. Lindberg, S. F. Badylak. 2006. The basement membrane component of biologic scaffolds derived from extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng. 12:519-526.
17. Gilbert, T. W., S. Wognum, S. F. Badylak. 2008. Collagen fiber alignment and biaxial mechanical behavior of porcine urinary bladder derived extracellular matrix. Biomaterials. 29:4775-4782.
18. Pelham, Jr., R. J., and Y. Wang. 1997. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:13661-13665.
19. Engler, A. J., S. Sen, D. E. Discher. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 126:677-689.
20. Engler, A. J., F. Rehfeldt, D. E. Discher. 2007. Microtissue elasticity: measurements by atomic force microscopy and its influence on cell differentiation. Methods Cell Biol. 83:521-545.
21. Moore, S. W., P. Roca-Cusachs, and M. P. Sheetz. 2010. Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrinmediated rigidity sensing. Dev. Cell. 19:194-206.
22. Nemir, S., and J. L. West. 2010. Synthetic materials in the study of cell response to substrate rigidity. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38:2-20.
23. Guelcher, S. A. 2008. Biodegradable polyurethanes: synthesis and applications in regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 14:3-17.
24. Oertel, G. 1994. Polyurethane Handbook. Hanser Publications, Munich.
25. Freytes, D. O., S. F. Badylak, A. E. Rundell. 2004. Biaxial strength of multilaminated extracellular matrix scaffolds. Biomaterials. 25:2353-2361.
26. Yurchenco, P. D., and G. C. Ruben. 1987. Basement membrane structure in situ: evidence for lateral associations in the type IV collagen network. J. Cell Biol. 105:2559-2568.
27. Storey, R. F., J. S. Wiggins, and A. D. Puckett. 1994. Hydrolyzable poly (ester-urethane) networks from L-lysine diisocyanate and D, L-lactide/3- caprolactone homo-and copolyester triols. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 32:2345-2363.
28. Kandow, C. E., P. C. Georges, K. A. Beningo. 2007. Polyacrylamide hydrogels for cell mechanics: steps toward optimization and alternative uses. Methods Cell Biol. 83:29-46.
29. Guelcher, S., A. Srinivasan, J. Hollinger. 2007. Synthesis, in vitro degradation, and mechanical properties of two-component poly (ester urethane) urea scaffolds: effects of water and polyol composition. Tissue Eng. 13:2321-2333.
30. Inoue, S. 1994. Basic structure of basement membranes is a fine network of "cords, " irregular anastomosing strands. Microsc. Res. Tech. 28:29-47.
31. Fung, Y. 1997. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. Gilbert, T. W., M. S. Sacks, M. B. Chancellor. 2006. Fiber kinematics of small intestinal submucosa under biaxial and uniaxial stretch. J. Biomech. Eng. 128:890-898.
33. Freytes, D. O., R. M. Stoner, and S. F. Badylak. 2008. Uniaxial and biaxial properties of terminally sterilized porcine urinary bladder matrix scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 84:408-414.
34. Machalek, A. 2005. An owner's guide to the cell. In Inside the Cell. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Bethesda, MD. http://publications.nigms.nih.gov/insidethecell/index.html.
35. Candiello, J., M. Balasubramani, H. Lin. 2007. Biomechanical properties of native basement membranes. FEBS J. 274:2897-2908.
36. Candiello, J., G. J. Cole, and W. Halfter. 2010. Age-dependent changes in the structure, composition and biophysical properties of a human basement membrane. Matrix Biol. 29:402-410.
37. Chan, B. P., and K. F. So. 2005. Photochemical crosslinking improves the physicochemical properties of collagen scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 75:689-701.
38. Yeung, T., P. C. Georges, P. A. Janmey. 2005. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 60:24-34.
39. Callister, W. 2000. Fundamentals of Material Science and Engineering: An Interactive E-Text. John Wiley & Sons, Somerset, NJ.
40. Discher, D. E., P. Janmey, and Y. L. Wang. 2005. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 310:1139-1143.
41. Wells, R. G., and D. E. Discher. 2008. Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal tension, and TGF-β: the insoluble and soluble meet. Sci. Signal. 1: pe13.
42. Wozniak, M. A., R. Desai, P. J. Keely. 2003. ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. J. Cell Biol. 163:583-595.
43. Levental, K. R., H. Yu, V. M. Weaver. 2009. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell. 139:891-906.
44. Edsberg, L. E., R. Cutway, J. R. Natiella. 2000. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of human tissue at and adjacent to pressure ulcers. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37:463-471.
45. Krouskop, T. A., T. M. Wheeler, T. Hall. 1998. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason. Imaging. 20:260-274.
46. Samani, A., J. Zubovits, and D. Plewes. 2007. Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples. Phys. Med. Biol. 52:1565-1576.
47. Van Houten, E. E. W., M. M. Doyley, K. D. Paulsen. 2003. Initial in vivo experience with steady-state subzone-based MR elastography of the human breast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 17:72-85.
48. Welling, L. W., M. T. Zupka, and D. J. Welling. 1995. Mechanical properties of basement membrane. News Physiol. Sci. 10:30-35.
49. Geiger, B., J. P. Spatz, and A. D. Bershadsky. 2009. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:21-33.
50. Brábek, J., C. T. Mierke, B. Fabry. 2010. The role of the tissue microenvironment in the regulation of cancer cell motility and invasion. Cell Commun. Signal. 8:22.
51. Engler, A. J., M. A. Griffin, D. E. Discher. 2004. Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J. Cell Biol. 166:877-887.
52. Liu, S., H. Yamashita, V. Quaranta. 2010. Laminin-332-β1 integrin interactions negatively regulate invadopodia. J. Cell. Physiol. 223:134-142.
53. Reference deleted in proof.
54. Nyman, J. S., H. Leng, X. Wang. 2009. Differences in the mechanical behavior of cortical bone between compression and tension when subjected to progressive loading. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2:613-619.
55. Khatiwala, C. B., S. R. Peyton, A. J. Putnam. 2007. The regulation of osteogenesis by ECM rigidity in MC3T3-E1 cells requires MAPK activation. J. Cell. Physiol. 211:661-672.
56. Smith, K. E., S. L. Hyzy, B. D. Boyan. 2010. The dependence of MG63 osteoblast responses to (meth) acrylate-based networks on chemical structure and stiffness. Biomaterials. 31:6131-6141.
57. Chevalier, Y., D. Pahr, P. Zysset. 2007. Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation. J. Biomech. 40:3333-3340.