Sensitivity of the lane change test as a measure of in-vehicle system demand

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 611-618

  Young, Kristie L ^a   Lenné, Michael G ^a   Williamson, Amy R ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Driver distraction; Evaluation methods; In vehicle information systems; Lane change test

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DRIVER DISTRACTIONS; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; EVALUATION METHODS; IN-VEHICLE DEVICES; IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; IN-VEHICLE SYSTEMS; LANE CHANGE TESTS; MATH PROBLEM SOLVING;

VEHICLES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRIVING ABILITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IN VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; LANE CHANGE TEST; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMETRY; RESPONSE TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAFFIC SAFETY; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT; VISUAL INFORMATION; WORKLOAD;

EID: 79551607630     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brookhuis K.A., de Vries G., de Waard D. The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention 1991, 23:309-316.
2. Bruyas M.P., Brusque C., Tattegrain H., Auriault A., Aillerie I., Duraz M. Consistency and sensitivity of lane change test according to driving simulator characteristics. IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2008, 2:306-314.
3. Burns P.C., Trbovich P.L., McCurdie T., Harbluk J.L. Measuring distraction: task duration and the lane-change test (LCT). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting 2005.
4. Chiang D.P., Brooks A.M., Weir D.H.D.H. On the highway measures of driver glance behavior with an example automobile navigation system. Applied Ergonomics 2004, 35:215-223.
5. Collet C., Clarion A., Morel M., Chapon A., Petit C. Physiological and behavioural changes associated to the management of secondary tasks while driving. Applied Ergonomics 2009, 40:1041-1046.
6. Consiglio W., Driscoll P., Witte M., Berg W.P. Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2003, 35:495-500.
7. Engstrom J., Johansson E., Ostlund J. Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2005, 8:97-120.
8. Engström J., Markkula G. Effects of visual and cognitive distraction on lane change test performance. Driving Assessment 2007 2007, Stevenson, Washington.
9. Gelau C., Henning M.J., Krems J.F. On the reliability of the occlusion technique as a tool for the assessment of the HMI of in-vehicle information and communication systems. Applied Ergonomics 2009, 40:181-184.
10. Greenberg J., Tijerina L., Curry R., Artz B., Cathey L., Grant P., Kochlar D., Kozak K., Blommer M. Evaluation of driver distraction using an event detection paradigm. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2003, 1843.
11. Harbluk J.L., Burns P.C., Lochner M., Trbovich P.L. Using the lane-change test (LCT) to assess distraction: tests of visual-manual and speech-based operation of navigation System interfaces. Driving Assessment 2007 2007, Stevenson, Washington.
12. Harbluk J.L., Mitroi J.S., Burns P.C. Three navigation systems with three tasks: using the lane change test (LCT) to assess distraction demand. Fifth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design 2009, Big Sky, Montana.
13. Harms L., Patten C. Peripheral detection as a measure of driver distraction. A study of memory-based versus system-based navigation in a built-up area. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2003, 6:23-36.
14. ISO Road vehicles - ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Simulated lane change test to assess driver distraction. ISO/DIS 26022. Draft International Standard 2007, International Organization for Standardization.
15. ISO Road vehicles - ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Simulated lane change test to assess in-vehicle secondary task demand. ISO/DIS 26022, Draft International Standard 2009, International Organization for Standardization.
16. Jamson H.A., Merat N. Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2005, 8:79-96.
17. Klauer S.G., Dingus T.A., Neale V.L., Sudweeks J.D., Ramsey D.J. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-crash/crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data 2006, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia.
18. Lenné M.G., Dietze P., Triggs T., Walmsley S., Murphy B., Redman J. The effects of cannabis, alcohol, driving experience and task demand on simulated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2010, 42:859-866.
19. Maciej J., Vollrath M. Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2009, 41:924-930.
20. Mäntylä T., Karlsson M.J., Marklund M. Executive control functions in simulated driving. Applied Neuropsychology 2009, 16:11-18.
21. Mattes S. The lane change task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. IHRA-ITS Workshop on Driving Simulator Scenarios 2003, Dearborn, Michigan.
22. Mattes S., Hallén A. Surrogate distraction measurement techniques: the lane-change test. Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects and Mitigation 2008, 107-122. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee, K.L. Young (Eds.).
23. Noy Y.I., Lemoine T.L., Klachan C., Burns P.C. Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction. Applied Ergonomics: The Occlusion Technique 2004, 35:207-213.
24. Olsson S., Burns P.C. Measuring Driver Visual Distraction with a Peripheral Detection Task 2000.
25. Ranney T.A., Mazzae E., Garrott R., Goodman M.J. NHTSA driver distraction research: past, present, and future. Driver Distraction Internet Forum, 2000 2000, NHSTA.
26. Recarte M.A., Nunes L.M. Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2003, 9:119-137.
27. Regan M., Lee J.D., Young K. Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects and Mitigation 2008, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
28. Rognin L., Alidra S., Val C., Lescoaut A., Chalandon X. Driver strategies when interacting with information and comfort systems. 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles 2007, Lyon, France.
29. Senders J.W., Kristofferson A.B., Levison W.H., Dietrich C.W., Ward J.L. The attentional demand of automobile driving. Highway Research Record 1967, 195:15-33.
30. Strayer D.L., Drews F.A. Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human Factors 2004, 46:640.
31. Strayer D.L., Drews F.A., Johnston W.A. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 9:23-32.
32. van Winsum W., Martens M., Herland L. The Effect of Speech versus Tactile Driver Support Messages on Workload, Driver Behaviour and User Acceptance 1999, TNO-report TM-99-C043, TNO, Soesterberg, Netherlands.
33. Wilschut E.S., Rinkenauer G., Brookhuis K.A., Falkenstein M. Effects of visual search task complexity on lane change task performance. Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems 2008, Lyon, France.
34. Wittmann M., Kiss M., Gugg P., Steffen A., Fink M., Pöppel E., Kamiya H. Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. Applied Ergonomics 2006, 37:187-199.
35. Wynn T., Richardson J.H. Comparison of subjective workload ratings and performance measures of a reference IVIS task. European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems 2008, Lyon, France.
36. Young K.L., Regan M.A., Lee J.D. Measuring the effects of driver distraction: direct driving performance methods and measures. Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects and Mitigation 2008, 85-106. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee, K.L. Young (Eds.).
37. Zwahlen H.T., Adams C.C., de Bald D.P., et al. Safety aspects of CRT touch panel controls in automobiles. Vision in Vehicles II 1988, 335-344. The North Holland Press, Netherlands. A.G. Gale (Ed.).