Opposing patterns of neural priming in same-exemplar vs. different-exemplar repetition predict subsequent memory

NeuroImage

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 763-772

  Manelis, Anna ^a,c   Wheeler, Mark E ^b,c   Paynter, Christopher A ^a,c   Storey, Lisa ^a   Reder, Lynne M ^a,c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR THE NEURAL BASIS OF COGNITION   (United States)

Author keywords

Different exemplar; FMRI; Neural attenuation; Repetition priming; Same exemplar; Subsequent recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551589655     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.034     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Block R.A. Intent to remember briefly presented human faces and other pictorial stimuli enhances recognition memory. Mem. Cognit. 2009, 37:667-678.
2. Brewer J.B., Zhao Z., Desmond J.E., Glover G.H., Gabrieli J.D. Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science 1998, 281(5380):1185-1187.
3. Buckner R.L., Koutstaal W. Functional neuroimaging studies of encoding, priming, and explicit memory retrieval. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95(3):891-898.
4. Daselaar S.M., Fleck M.S., Cabeza R. Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: recollection, familiarity, and novelty. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96(4):1902-1911. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.01029.2005.
5. Dobbins I.G., Schnyer D.M., Verfaellie M., Schacter D.L. Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. Nature 2004, 428(6980):316-319. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02400.
6. Eddy M.D., Schnyer D., Schmid A., Holcomb P.J. Spatial dynamics of masked picture repetition effects. Neuroimage 2007, 34(4):1723-1732. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.031.
7. Eger E., Henson R.N.A., Driver J., Dolan R.J. Bold repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 92(2):1241-1247. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00206.2004.
8. Eldridge L.L., Knowlton B.J., Furmanski C.S., Bookheimer S.Y., Engel S.A. Remembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3(11):1149-1152. URL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11036273.
9. Garoff R.J., Slotnick S.D., Schacter D.L. The neural origins of specific and general memory: the role of the fusiform cortex. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43(6):847-859. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.014.
10. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24(1):187-203.
11. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10(1):14-23. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006.
12. Henson R.N.A. Neuroimaging studies of priming. Prog. Neurobiol. 2003, 70(1):53-81.
13. Henson R.N.A. A mini-review of fMRI studies of human medial temporal lobe activity associated with recognition memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 2005, 58(3-4):340-360. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724990444000113.
14. Horner A.J., Henson R.N. Priming, response learning and repetition suppression. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):1979-1991. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.018.
15. Jacoby L.L., Dallas M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1981, 110(3):306-340.
16. Jenkinson M., Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med. Image Anal. 2001, 5(2):143-156.
17. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M., Smith S. Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002, 17:825-841.
18. Joordens S., Hockley W.E. Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2000, 26(6):1534-1555.
19. Koutstaal W., Wagner A.D., Rotte M., Maril A., Buckner R.L., Schacter D.L. Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39(2):184-199. URL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11163375.
20. Mandler G. Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychol. Rev. 1980, 87:252-271.
21. Marsolek C.J. Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychol. Sci. 1999, 10:111-118.
22. Reder L.M., Nhouyvanisvong A., Schunn C.D., Ayers M.S., Angstadt P., Hiraki K. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2000, 26(2):294-320. URL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10764098.
23. Reder L.M., Oates J.M., Thornton E.R., Quinlan J.J., Kaufer A., Sauer J. Drug-induced amnesia hurts recognition, but only for memories that can be unitized. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17(7):562-567. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01744.x.
24. Reder L.M., Paynter C., Diana R., Ngiam J., Dickison D. Experience is a double-edged sword: a computational model of the encoding/retrieval tradeoff with familiarity. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 2007, 271-312. Academic Press, URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(07)48007-0, B. Ross, A. Benjamin (Eds.).
25. Schacter D.L., Buckner R.L. On the relations among priming, conscious recollection, and inten- tional retrieval: evidence from neuroimaging research. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 1998, 70(1-2):284-303. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nlme.1998.3854.
26. Schacter D.L., Wagner A.D. Medial temporal lobe activations in fMRI and pet studies of episodic encoding and retrieval. Hippocampus 1999, 9(1):7-24. URL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10088896.
27. Schnyer D.M., Dobbins I.G., Nicholls L., Schacter D.L., Verfaellie M. Rapid response learning in amnesia: delineating associative learning components in repetition priming. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(1):140-149. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.027.
28. Schnyer D.M., Dobbins I.G., Nicholls L., Davis S., Verfaellie M., Schacter D.L. Item to decision mapping in rapid response learning. Mem. Cognit. 2007, 35(6):1472-1482.
29. Simons J.S., Koutstaal W., Prince S., Wagner A.D., Schacter D.L. Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex. Neuroimage 2003, 19(3):613-626.
30. Smith S. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 17(3):143-155.
31. Turk-Browne N.B., Yi D.-J., Chun M.M. Linking implicit and explicit memory: common encoding factors and shared representations. Neuron 2006, 49(6):917-927. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.030.
32. Vuilleumier P., Schwartz S., Duhoux S., Dolan R.J., Driver J. Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and "implicit" visual memory: suppressions and enhancements revealed by fmri. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17(8):1245-1260. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0898929055002409.
33. Wagner A.D., Schacter D.L., Rotte M., Koutstaal W., Maril A., Dale A.M., Rosen B.R., Buckner R.L. Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science 1998, 281(5380):1188-1191.
34. Wagner A.D., Maril A., Schacter D.L. Interactions between forms of memory: when priming hinders new episodic learning. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12(Suppl 2):52-60. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892900564064.
35. Wheeler M.E., Buckner R.L. Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing. Neuroimage 2004, 21(4):1337-1349. URL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15050559.
36. Wig G.S., Grafton S.T., Demos K.E., Kelley W.M. Reductions in neural activity underlie behavioral components of repetition priming. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8(9):1228-1233. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1515.
37. Wiggs C.L., Martin A. Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1998, 8(2):227-233. URL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635206.
38. Yi D.-J., Chun M.M. Attentional modulation of learning-related repetition attenuation effects in human parahippocampal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25(14):3593-3600. URL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4677-04.2005.
39. Yonelinas A.P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1994, 20(6):1341-1354.
40. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30years of research. J. Mem. Lang. 2002, 46(3):441-517.