Pelvic incidentalomas

Cancer Imaging

Volumn 10, Issue SPEC. ISS. A, 2010, Pages

  Gore, R M ^a   Newmark, G M ^a   Thakrar, K H ^a   Mehta, U K ^a   Berlin, J W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer metastases; Colon cancer metastases; Gastric cancer metastases; pelvic lymph nodes; pelvic veins.; Incidental ovarian mass; Incidentaloma; Krukenberg tumors; Ovarian cyst; Ovarian metastases

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSEL; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; LYMPH NODE; OVARY TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PELVIS TUMOR; REVIEW; UTERUS CANCER;

BLOOD VESSELS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; LYMPH NODES; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; PELVIC NEOPLASMS; UTERINE NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79551564151     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14707330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2010.9021     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Meiners RJ, et al. Colorectal and extracolonic cancers detected at screening CT colonography in 10286 asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2010; 255: 83-8. doi:10.1148/ radiol.09090939. PMid:20308446.
2. Lumbreras B, Donat L, Hernandez-Aguado I. Incidental findings in imaging diagnostic tests: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 2010; 83: 276-89. doi:10.1259/bjr/98067945. PMid:20335439.
3. Flicker MS, Tsoukas AT, Hazra A, Dachman AH. Economic impact of extracolonic findings at computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32: 497-503. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181692091. PMid:18664832.
4. Salman R, Whiteley WN, Warlow C. Screening using wholebody magnetic resonance imaging scanning: who wants an incidentaloma? J Med Screen 2007; 14: 2-4. doi:10.1258/ 096914107780154530. PMid:17362563. (Pubitemid 46440357)
5. Khan KY, Xiong T, McCafferty I, et al. Frequency and impact of extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic colonography in a symptomatic population. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 355-61. doi:10.1002/bjs.5498. PMid:17262750. (Pubitemid 46423855)
6. Al-Shahi Salman R, Whiteley WN, Warlow C. Screening using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging scanning: who wants an incidentaloma? J Med Screen 2007; 14: 2-4. doi:10.1258/ 096914107780154530. PMid:17362563. (Pubitemid 46440357)
7. Ladd SC. Whole-body MRI as a screening tool? Eur J Radiol 2009; 70: 452-62. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.02.011. PMid:-19345540.
8. Schmidt GP, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A. Whole-body MRI for the staging and follow-up of patients with metastasis. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70: 393-400. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.045. PMid:-19457631.
9. McDermott S, Skehan SJ. Whole body imaging in the abdominal cancer patient: pitfalls of PET-CT. Abdom Imaging 2010; 35: 55-69. doi:10.1007/s00261- 008-9493-4. PMid:19130117.
10. Brown DL. A practical approach to the ultrasound characterization of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Q 2007; 23: 87-105. doi:10.1097/01.ruq.0000263849. 45926.cb. PMid:17538485. (Pubitemid 46849936)
11. AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of Pelvic Ultrasound Examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 166-72.
12. Levine D, Gosink BB, Wolf IS, et al. Simple adnexal cysts: the natural history in postmenopausal women. Radiology 1992; 184: 653-9.
13. Kroon Ewa, Andolf E. Diagnosis and follow-up of simple ovarian cysts detected by ultrasound in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 211-14. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(94)00366-L.
14. Goldstein SR, Subramanyam B, Snyder JR. The postmenopausal cystic adnexal mass: the potential role of ultrasound in conservative management. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 8-10. (Pubitemid 19020994)
15. Slanetz PJ, Hahn PF, Hall DA, Mueller PR. The frequency and significance of adnexal lesions incidentally revealed by CT. AJR 1997; 168: 647-50. (Pubitemid 27089923)
16. Curtin JP. Management of the adnexal mass. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 55: S42-6. doi:10.1006/gyno.1994.1340. PMid:7835810.
17. Ulbright TM, Roth LN, Stehman FB. Secondary ovarian neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Cancer 1984; 53: 1164-74. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19840301)53:551164::-AID-CNCR282053052343.0.CO;2-4. (Pubitemid 14196498)
18. Abrams HL, Giordano TJ, Brodeur FJ, et al. Metastases in carcinoma: analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer 1950; 3: 74-85. doi:10.1002/1097- 0142(1950)3:1574::AID-CNCR2820030111-43.0.CO;2-7.
19. Petru E, Pickel M, Heydarfadai M, et al. Nongenital cancers metastatic to the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 1992; 44: 83-6. doi:10.1016/0090-8258(92)90017-D.
20. Yakushiji M, Tazaki T, Nishimura H, et al. Krukenberg tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 112 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Jpn 1987; 39: 479-485.
21. Brookes M, MacVicar D, Husband J. Metastatic carcinoma of the breast: the appearances of metastatic spread to the abdomen and pelvis as demonstrated by CT. Br J Radiol 2007; 80: 284-92. doi:10.1259/bjr/50066770. PMid:17038411. (Pubitemid 47018383)
22. Rosen PP, Groshen S, Kinne DW, Hellman S. Nonmammary malignant neoplasms in patients with stage I and stage II breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 1989; 12: 169-74.
23. Moore RG, Chung M, Granai CO, et al. Incidence of metastasis to the ovaries from nongenital tract primary tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 93: 87-91. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.12.039. PMid:-15047218. (Pubitemid 38429553)
24. Chang W-C, Meux MD, Yeh BM, et al. CT and MRI of adnexal masses in patients with primary nonovarian malignancy. AJR 2006; 186: 1039-45. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.0997. PMid:16554576. (Pubitemid 46100205)
25. Kim SH, Kim WH, Park KJ, et al. CT and MR findings of Krukenberg tumors: comparison with primary ovarian tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 393-8. doi:10.1097/ 00004728-199605000-00013. PMid:8626898. (Pubitemid 26142292)
26. Ha HK, Baek SY, Kim SH, et al. Krukenberg-s tumor of the ovary: MR imaging features. AJR 1994; 164: 1435-9.
27. Choi HJ, Lee J-H, Kang S, et al. Contrast-enhanced CT for differentiation of ovarian metastasis from gastrointestinal tract cancer: stomach cancer versus colon cancer. AJR 2006; 187: 741-5. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0944. PMid:16928939. (Pubitemid 44651499)
28. Choi HJ, Lee JH, Kim YH, et al. Computed tomography findings of ovarian metastases from colon cancer: comparison with primary malignant ovarian tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 26: 69-73. (Pubitemid 40194441)
29. Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH, et al. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology 1998; 208: 103-10. (Pubitemid 28323316)
30. Curtin JP, Barakat RR, Hoskins WJ. Ovarian disease in women with breast cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 449-52. (Pubitemid 24267309)
31. Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, et al. The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1401-8. doi:10.1056/ NEJM199705153362001. PMid:9145676. (Pubitemid 27208598)
32. Lamovec J, Bracko M. Metastatic pattern of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: an autopsy study. J Surg Oncol 1994; 48: 28-33. doi:10.1002/jso.2930480106. PMid:1653879.
33. Hann LE, Lui DM, Shi W, et al. Adnexal masses in women with breast cancer: US findings with clinical and histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2000; 216: 242-7. (Pubitemid 30434749)
34. Gore RM, Meyers MA. Pathways of abdominal and pelvic disease spread. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, editors. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2008, p. 2099-118.
35. Weiner Z, Beck D, Shteiner M, et al. Screening for ovarian cancer in women with breast cancer with transvaginal sonography and color flow imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1993; 12: 387-93. (Pubitemid 23199307)
36. Hale RW. Krukenberg tumor of the ovary: a review of 81 records. Obstet Gynecol 1968; 32: 221-5.
37. Webb MJ, Decker DG, Hussey E. Cancer metastatic to the ovary: factors influencing survival. Obstet Gynecol 1975; 45: 391-6.
38. Holtz F, Hart WR. Krukenberg tumors of the ovary. Cancer 1982; 50: 2438-47. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19821201)50:-1152438::-AID-CNCR282050113243.0. CO;2-X.
39. Kim SH, Kim WH, Park KJ, et al. CT and MR findings of Krukenberg tumors: comparison with primary ovarian tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 393-8. doi:10.1097/ 00004728-199605000-00013. PMid:8626898. (Pubitemid 26142292)
40. Ferrozzi F, Tognini G, Bova D, Zuccoli G. Non-Hodgkin lymphomas of the ovaries: MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 416-20. doi:10.1097/00004728-200005000-00011. PMid:10864078. (Pubitemid 32203933)
41. Osborn BM, Robboy SJ. Lymphoma or leukemia as ovarian tumors: an analysis of 42 cases. Cancer 1983; 52: 1933-43. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19831115)52: 1051933::AID-CNCR-282052102643.0.CO;2-8. (Pubitemid 14228164)
42. Koyama T, Mikami Y, Saga T, et al. Secondary ovarian tumors: spectrum of CT and MR features with pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 2007; 32: 784-95. doi:10.1007/s00261-007-9186-4. PMid:17318680. (Pubitemid 350060502)
43. Young RH, Hart WR. Metastases from carcinomas of the pancreas simulating primary mucinous tumors of the ovary: report of seven cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13: 748-56. doi:10.1097/ 00000478-198909000-00004. PMid:2764222. (Pubitemid 19201945)
44. Tsili AC, Dalkalitsis N, Paraskevaidis E, Tsampoulas K. Multi-detector CT features of benign adnexal lesions. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 31-8. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.06.014. PMid:-19734064.
45. Tsili AC, Tsampoulas C, Charisiadi A, et al. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 110: 22-31. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.03.022. PMid:18486202.
46. Tsili AC, Tsampoulas C, Argyropoulou M. Comparative evaluation of multidetector CT and MR imaging in the differentiation of adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 2008; 1049-57.
47. Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR-imaging multivariate analysis. Radiology 2000; 214: 39-46. (Pubitemid 30019867)
48. Hamm B., Huch-Kubic RA, Fleige B. MR imaging and CT of the female pelvis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 3-15. doi:10.1007/s003300050620. PMid:9933373.
49. Zhang J, Mironov S, Hricak H, et al. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32: 533-40. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181568890. PMid:-18664838.
50. Potter AW, Chandrasekhar CA. US and CT evaluation of acute pelvic pain of gynecologic origin in nonpregnant premenopausal patients. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1645-59. doi:10.1148/ rg.286085504. PMid:18936027.
51. Ewa Kuligowska E, Deeds L, Lu K. Pelvic pain: overlooked and underdiagnosed gynecologic conditions. Radiographics 2005; 25: 3-20. doi:10.1148/rg.251045511. PMid:15653583. (Pubitemid 40186936)
52. Szklaruk J, Tamm EP, Choi H, Varavithya V. MR imaging of common and uncommon large pelvic masses. Radiographics 2003; 23: 403-24. doi:10.1148/rg.232025089. PMid:12640156. (Pubitemid 37431272)
53. Kalish GM, Patel MD, Gunn MLD, Dubinsky TJ. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance features of gynecologic abnormalities in women presenting with acute or chronic abdominal pain. Ultrasound Q 2007; 23: 167-75. doi:10.1097/ RUQ.0b013e31815202df. PMid:17805165. (Pubitemid 47367985)
54. Park SB, Kim JK, Kim K-R, Cho K-S. Imaging findings of complications and unusual manifestations of ovarian teratomas. Radiology 2008; 28: 969-83.
55. Kinkel K, Lu Y, Mehdizade A, et al. Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second image test for characterization-Meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 2005; 236: 85-94. doi:10.1148/radiol.2361041618. PMid:15955864. (Pubitemid 40853299)
56. Patel MD, Dubinsky TJ. Reimaging the female pelvis with ultrasound after CT: general principles. Ultrasound Q 2007; 23: 177-87. doi:10.1097/RUQ. 0b013e318151fc31. PMid:17805166. (Pubitemid 47367986)
57. Spencer JA, Forstner R, Cunha T, et al. ESUR guidelines for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an algorithmic approach. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 25-35. doi:10.1007/ s00330-009-1584-2. PMid:20069737.
58. Asch E, Levine D, Pedrosa I, et al. Patterns of misinterpretation of adnexal masses on CT and MR in an academic radiology department. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 969-80. doi:10.1016/ j.acra.2009.02.016. PMid:19380241.
59. Fasih N, Shanbhogue AKP, MacDonald DB, et al. Leiomyomas beyond the uterus: unusual locations, rare manifestations. Radiographics 2008; 1931-48.
60. Nalaboff KM, Pellerito JS, Ben-Levi E. Imaging the endometrium: disease and normal variants. Radiographics 2001; 21: 1409-24. (Pubitemid 33706940)
61. Fleischer AC. Transvaginal sonography of endometrial disorders: an overview. RadioGraphics 1998; 18: 923-30. (Pubitemid 128466699)
62. Fleischer AC. Sonographic assessment of endometrial disorders. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1999; 20: 259-66. doi:10.1016/S0887-2171(99)90071-9. (Pubitemid 29380622)
63. Carlson JA, Arger P, Thompston S, Carlson EJ. Clinical and pathologic correlation of endometrial cavity fluid detected by ultrasound in the postmenopausal patient. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 119-23.
64. Umeoka S, Koyama T, Tagashi K, et al. Vascular dilation in the pelvis: identification with CT and MR imaging. Radiographics 2004; 24: 193-208. doi:10.1148/rg.241035061. PMid:14730046. (Pubitemid 38134605)
65. Park SJ, Lim JW, Ko YT, et al. Diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. AJR 2004; 182: 683-8. (Pubitemid 38269530)
66. Moron FR, Szklaruk J. Learning the nodal stations in the abdomen. Br J Radiol 2007; 80: 841-8. doi:10.1259/bjr/64292252. PMid:17959923. (Pubitemid 350205524)
67. Moore RG, DePasquale SE, Steinhoff MM, et al. Sentinel node identification and the ability to detect metastatic tumor to inguinal lymph nodes in squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 89: 475-9. doi:10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00130-6. (Pubitemid 36687795)
68. Lucey BC, Stuhlfaut J, Soto JA. Mesenteric lymph nodes seen at imaging: causes and consequences. Radiographics 2005; 25: 351-65. doi:10.1148/rg. 252045108. PMid:15798054. (Pubitemid 40547051)
69. Lucey BC, Stuhlfaut JW, Soto JA. Mesenteric lymph nodes: detection and significance on MDCT. AJR 2005; 184: 41-4. (Pubitemid 40040902)
70. McMahon CJ, Rofsky, Pedrosa I. Lymphatic metastases from pelvic tumors: anatomic classification, characterization, and staging. Radiology 2010; 254: 31-47. doi:10.1148/radiol.-2541090361. PMid:20032141.