Prostate T1 quantification using a magnetization-prepared spiral technique

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 474-481

  Foltz, Warren D ^a   Haider, Masoom A ^a   Chung, Peter ^a   Bayley, Andrew ^a   Catton, Charles ^a   Ramanan, Venkat ^a   Jaffray, David ^a   Wright, Graham A ^a   Ménard, Cynthia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

prostate gland; quantitative MRI; T1 quantification

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HUMAN; MAGNETIZATION PREPARED SPIRAL IMAGING TECHNIQUE; MALE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION; RADIOSENSITIVITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79551562238     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22450     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Tofts P,. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 91-101.
2. Dale B, Jesberger J, Lewin J, Hillenbrand C, Duerk J,. Determining and optimizing the precision of quantitative measurements of perfusion from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18: 575-584.
3. McSheehy PM, Weidensteiner C, Cannet C, et al. Quantified tumor T1 is a generic early-response imaging biomarker for chemotherapy reflecting cell viability. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16: 212-225.
4. Kettunen MI, Sierra A, Narvainen J, et al. Low spin-lock field T1 relaxation in the rotating frame as a sensitive MR imaging marker for gene therapy treatment response in rat glioma. Radiology 2007; 243: 796-803.
5. Tadamura E, Hatabu H, Li W, Prasad P, Edelman R,. Effect of oxygen inhalation on relaxation times in various tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 220-225.
6. Foltz W, Yang Y, Graham J, Detsky J, Wright G, Dick A,. MRI relaxation fluctuations in acute reperfused infarction. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 1311-1319.
7. Crawley A, Henkelman R,. A comparison of one-shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging. Magn Reson Med 1988; 7: 23-34.
8. Deichmann R,. Fast high-resolution T1 mapping of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 20-27.
9. Cheng H, Wright G,. Rapid high-resolution T1 mapping by variable flip angles: accurate and precise measurements in the presence of radiofrequency field inhomogeneity. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 566-574.
10. Hsu J, Zaharchuk G, Glover G,. Rapid methods for concurrent measurement of the RF-pulse flip angle and the longitudinal relaxation time. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 1319-1325.
11. Hsu J, Glover G,. Rapid MRI method for mapping the longitudinal relaxation time. J Magn Reson 2006; 181: 98-106.
12. Kurland R,. Strategies and tactics in NMR relaxation time measurements. I. Minimizing relaxation time errors due to image noise - the ideal case. Magn Reson Med 1985; 2: 136-158.
13. Cunningham C, Pauly J, Nayak K,. Saturated double-angle method for rapid B1+ mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 55: 1326-1333.
14. Constantinides C, Atalar E, McVeigh E,. Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997; 38: 852-857.
15. Foltz WD, Stainsby JA, Wright GA,. T2 accuracy on a whole-body imager. Magn Reson Med 1997; 38: 759-786.
16. Treier R, Steingoetter A, Fried M, Schwizer W, Boesiger P,. Optimized and combined T1 and B1 mapping technique for fast and accurate T1 quantification in contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 568-576.
17. Sung K, Nayak KS,. Measurement and characterization of RF nonuniformity over the heart at 3T using body coil transmission. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 643-648.
18. Irarrazabal P, Meyer CH, Nishimura DG, Macovski A,. Inhomogeneity correction using an estimated linear field map. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35: 278-282.
19. Prakash V, Stainsby JA, Satkunasingham J, et al. Validation of supervised automated algorithm for fast quantitative evaluation of organ motion on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71: 1253-1260.
20. Ghilezan MJ, Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, et al. Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 406-417.
21. Villeirs GM, De Meerleer GO, Verstraete KL, De Neve WJ,. Magnetic resonance assessment of prostate localization variability in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 60: 1611-1621.
22. Scheffler K, Henning J,. T1 quantification with inversion recovery TrueFISP. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 720-723.
23. Deoni S, Peters T, Rutt B,. High-resolution T1 and T2 mapping of the brain in a clinically acceptable time with DESPOT1 and DESPOT2. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 237-241.
24. Kershaw L, Hutchinson C, Buckley D,. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: evaluation of T1, T2, and microvascular characteristics with T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 641-648.
25. Kjaer L, Thomsen C, Iversen P, Henriksen, O,. In vivo estimation of relaxation processes in benign hyperplasia and carcinoma of the prostate gland by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1987; 5: 23-30.
26. Kershaw L, Logue J, Hutchinson C, Clarke N, Buckley D,. Late tissue effects following radiotherapy and neoadjuvant hormone therapy of the prostate measured with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Radiother Oncol 2008; 88: 127-134.
27. de Bazelaire C, Duhamel G, Rofsky N, Alsop D,. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology 2004; 230: 652-659.
28. Noworolski S, Henry R, Vigneron D, Kurhanewicz J,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in normal and abnormal prostate tissues as defined by biopsy, MRI, and 3D MRSI. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 249-255.