MR angiography of collateral arteries in a hind limb ischemia model: Comparison between blood pool agent gadomer and small contrast agent Gd-DTPA

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Jaspers, Karolien ^a,b   Versluis, Bas ^a,b   Leiner, Tim ^a,b   Dijkstra, Petra ^c   Oostendorp, Marlies ^a,b   van Golde, Jolanda M ^b   Post, Mark J ^a,c   Backes, Walter H ^a,b,d  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; GADOMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP FEMORAL ARTERY; EXPERIMENTAL RABBIT; FEMORAL ARTERY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NONHUMAN; VEIN; X RAY ANGIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; ARTERY; CHEMISTRY; COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; HINDLIMB; ISCHEMIA; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RABBIT; STANDARD; VASCULARIZATION;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

ANIMALS; ARTERIES; COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HINDLIMB; ISCHEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; RABBITS;

EID: 79551529782     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016159     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cao R, Brakenhielm E, Pawliuk R, Wariaro D, Post MJ, et al. (2003) Angiogenic synergism, vascular stability and improvement of hind-limb ischemia by a combination of PDGF-BB and FGF-2. Nat Med 9: 604-613.
2. Schirmer SH, Buschmann IR, Jost MM, Hoefer IE, Grundmann S, et al. (2004) Differential effects of MCP-1 and leptin on collateral flow and arteriogenesis. Cardiovasc Res 64: 356-364.
3. Schirmer SH, van Nooijen FC, Piek JJ, van Royen N (2009) Stimulation of collateral artery growth: travelling further down the road to clinical application. Heart 95: 191-197.
4. Backes WH, Nijenhuis RJ, Mess WH, Wilmink FA, Schurink GW, et al. (2008) Magnetic resonance angiography of collateral blood supply to spinal cord in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm patients. J Vasc Surg 48: 261-271.
5. Baumgartner I, Thoeny HC, Kummer O, Roefke C, Skjelsvik C, et al. (2005) Leg ischemia: assessment with MR angiography and spectroscopy. Radiology 234: 833-841.
6. de Lussanet QG, van Golde JC, Beets-Tan RG, de Haan MW, Zaar DV, et al. (2006) Magnetic resonance angiography of collateral vessel growth in a rabbit femoral artery ligation model. NMR Biomed 19: 77-83.
7. Wecksell MB, Winchester PA, Bush HL, Jr., Kent KC, Prince MR, et al. (2001) Cross-sectional pattern of collateral vessels in patients with superficial femoral artery occlusion. Invest Radiol 36: 422-429.
8. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, Heisey DM, Korosec FR, et al. (2002) Timeresolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 225: 43-52.
9. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, Lee HM, Watts R, et al. (2001) Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase threedimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 36: 170-177.
10. Bonel HM, Saar B, Hoppe H, Keo HH, Husmann M, et al. (2009) MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA. Radiology 253: 879-890.
11. Bremerich J, Bilecen D, Reimer P (2007) MR angiography with blood pool contrast agents. Eur Radiol 17: 3017-3024.
12. Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann HJ (2005) Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 40: 715-724.
13. Dong Q, Hurst DR, Weinmann HJ, Chenevert TL, Londy FJ, et al. (1998) Magnetic resonance angiography with gadomer-17. An animal study original investigation. Invest Radiol 33: 699-708.
14. Li D, Zheng J, Weinmann HJ (2001) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of coronary arteries: comparison of intra- and extravascular contrast agents in swine. Radiology 218: 670-678.
15. Clarke SE, Weinmann HJ, Dai E, Lucas AR, Rutt BK (2000) Comparison of two blood pool contrast agents for 0.5-T MR angiography: experimental study in rabbits. Radiology 214: 787-794.
16. Maki JH,Wang M, Wilson GJ, Shutske MG, Leiner T (2009) Highly accelerated first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vasculature: comparison of gadofosveset trisodium with gadopentetate dimeglumine contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 30: 1085-1092.
17. Corot C, Violas X, Robert P, Gagneur G, Port M (2003) Comparison of different types of blood pool agents (P792, MS325, USPIO) in a rabbit MR angiography-like protocol. Invest Radiol 38: 311-319.
18. Leiner T, Goyen M, Rohrer M, Schoenberg SO (2008) Clinical Blood Pool MR Imaging. Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag.
19. Port M, Corot C, Raynal I, Idee JM, Dencausse A, et al. (2001) Physicochemical and biological evaluation of P792, a rapid-clearance blood-pool agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 36: 445-454.
20. Port M, Corot C, Rousseaux O, Raynal I, Devoldere L, et al. (2001) P792: a rapid clearance blood pool agent for magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary results. Magma 12: 121-127.
21. Misselwitz B, Schmitt-Willich H, Ebert W, Frenzel T, Weinmann HJ (2001) Pharmacokinetics of Gadomer-17, a new dendritic magnetic resonance contrast agent. Magma 12: 128-134.
22. Herborn CU, Schmidt M, Bruder O, Nagel E, Shamsi K, et al. (2004) MR coronary angiography with SH L 643 A: initial experience in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 233: 567-573.
23. Nielsen YW, Eiberg JP, Logager VB, Hansen MA, Schroeder TV, et al. (2009) Whole-body MR angiography with body coil acquisition at 3 T in patients with peripheral arterial disease using the contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium. Acad Radiol 16: 654-661.
24. Hadizadeh DR, Gieseke J, Lohmaier SH, Wilhelm K, Boschewitz J, et al. (2008) Peripheral MR angiography with blood pool contrast agent: prospective intraindividual comparative study of high-spatial-resolution steady-state MR angiography versus standard-resolution first-pass MR angiography and DSA. Radiology 249: 701-711.
25. Jaspers K, Aerts HJ, Leiner T, Oostendorp M, van Riel NA, et al. (2009) Reliability of pharmacokinetic parameters: small vs. medium-sized contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 62: 779-787.
26. Longland CJ (1953) Collateral circulation in the limb. Postgrad Med J 29: 456-458.
27. Zhuang ZW, Gao L, Murakami M, Pearlman JD, Sackett TJ, et al. (2006) Arteriogenesis: noninvasive quantification with multi-detector row CT angiography and three-dimensional volume rendering in rodents. Radiology 240: 698-707.
28. Jaspers K, Leiner T, Dijkstra P, Oostendorp M, van Golde JM, et al. (2010) Optimized pharmacokinetic modeling for the detection of perfusion differences in skeletal muscle with DCE-MRI: Effect of contrast agent size. Med Phys 37: 5746-5755.