Patient self-assessment of appearance is improved more by all pedicle screw than by hybrid constructs in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 248-254

  Smucny, Mia ^a   Lubicky, John P ^b   Sanders, James O ^c   Carreon, Leah Y ^d   Diab, Mohammad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^d Spine Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; hybrid constructs; pedicle screws; selfassessment; spinal appearance questionnaire; SRS 30

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYBRID; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PEDICLE SCREW; PERSONAL APPEARANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY OUTCOMES INSTRUMENT; SELF EVALUATION; SELF REPORT; SPINAL APPEARANCE QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINE FUSION;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; BONE SCREWS; CHILD; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCOLIOSIS; SELF-ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79551525768     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cdb4be     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Karatoprak O, Unay K,Tezer M, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Int Orthop 2008;32:523-8.
2. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim JH, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:291-8.
3. Cheng I, Kim YJ, Gupta MC, et al. Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screws-which provided better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 2005;30:2104-12.
4. Di Silvestre M, Parisini P, Lolli F, et al. Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment. Spine 2007;32:1655-61.
5. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, et al. Thoracic pedicle screw fi xation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine 2001;26:2049-57.
6. Diab M, Smith AR, Kuklo TR, et al. Neural complications in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007; 32:2759-63.
7. Brown CA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws. Spine 1998;23: 1566-71.
8. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Lenke LG, et al. Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for ad olescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007;32:2258-64.
9. Mulpuri K, Perdios A, Reilly CW. Evidence-based medicine analysis of all pedicle screw constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007; 32(19 suppl):S109-14.
10. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 2008;371:1527-37.
11. Sanders JO, Harrast JJ, Kuklo TR, et al. The Spinal Appearance Question naire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007;32:2719-22.
12. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1435-40.
13. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, et al. Patients' perceptions of overall function, pain, and appearance after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1693-700.
14. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-3.
15. Danielsson A. What impact does spinal deformity correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis make on quality of life? Spine 2007;32(19 suppl):S101-8.
16. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, O'Brien MF, et al. Reliability analysis for digital adoles cent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:152-9.
17. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, et al. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:1240-6.
18. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in the posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:2040-8.