Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screws - Which provides better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 18, 2005, Pages 2104-2112

  Cheng, Ivan ^a   Kim, Yongjung ^b   Gupta, Munish C ^a   Bridwell, Keith H ^b   Hurford, Robert K ^b   Lee, Stanley S ^b   Theerajunyaporn, Thongchai ^b   Lenke, Lawrence G ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Apical sublaminar wires; Cotrel Dubousset instrumentation; Harrington rod; Luque instrumentation; Miami Moss instrumentation; Pedicle screws

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DISEASE; ADULT; APICAL SUBLAMINAR WIRE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRINGTON INSTRUMENTATION; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BONE SCREWS; BONE WIRES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 25444455079     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179261.70845.b7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. Am J Orthop 1962;44-A:591-610.
2. Luque ER. Segmental spinal instrumentation for the correction of scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;163:192-8.
3. Winter RB, Anderson NB. Spinal arthrodesis for spinal deformity using posterior instrumentation and sublaminar wiring. A preliminary report of 100 consecutive cases. Int Orthop 1985;9:239-45.
4. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J. New segmental posterior instrumentation of the spine. Orthop Trans 1985;9:118.
5. Denis F. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1988;19:291-311.
6. Boachie-Adjei O, Bradford D. The Cotrel-Dubousset system: Results in spinal reconstruction. Spine 1991;16:1155-60.
7. Bridwell KH, McAllister JW, Betz RR, et al. Coronal decompensation produced by Cotrel-Dubousset "derotation" maneuver for idiopathic right thoracic scoliosis. Spine 1990;15:644-9.
8. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, et al. Preventing decompensation in King Type II curves treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 1992;17:5274-81.
9. Asher MA, Strippgen WE, Heinig CF, et al. Isola spinal implant system. Semin Spine Surg 1992;4:175-92.
10. Asher MA. An improved technique for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Trans 1993;17:133.
11. Wood KB, Schendel MJ, Dekutoski MB, et al. Thoracic volume changes in scoliosis surgery. Spine 1996;21:718-23.
12. Luque ER. Interpeduncular segmental fixation. Clin Orthop 1986;203:54-7.
13. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, et al, A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop 1986;03:99-112.
14. Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ, et al. Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 1994;18:341-6.
15. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 2001;83A:1169-81.
16. Cofab JR, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Instructional Course Letters. Vol. 5. Ann Arbor, MI: J.W. Edwards; 1948.
17. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Keith HB, et al. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: Is it safe? Spine 2004;29:333-42.
18. Raynor BL, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Can triggered EMG thresholds accurately predict thoracic pedicle screw placement? Spine 2002;27:2030-5.
19. Webb JK, Burwell RG, Cole AA, et al. Posterior instrumentation in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1995;4:2-5.
20. Rinella AS, Lenke LG, Kim YJ. Posterior spinal instrumentation techniques for spinal deformity. In: Bradford DS, Zdeblick TA, eds. Master Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:231-46.
21. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke KM, et al. Analysis of pulmonary function and chest cage dimension changes after thoracoplasty in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995;20:1343-50.
22. Suk SI, Kim W, Lee S, et al. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformity: Are they really safe? Spine 2001;26:2049-57.
23. Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Won DS, et al. Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: The effect of anterior vs. posterior instrumentation. Spine 2002;27:2350-6.
24. Liljenqvist U, Allkemper T, Hackenberg L, et al. Analysis of the vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis with magnetic resonance imaging using muitiplanar reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84A:359-68.
25. O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, Mardjetko S, et al. Pedicle morphology in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is pedicle fixation an anatomically viable technique? Spine 2000;25:2285-93.
26. Papin P, Arlet V, Marchsei D, Rosenblatt B, Aebi M. Unusual presentation of spinal cord compression related to misplaced pedicle screws in thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1999;8:156-9.