It takes two-skilled recognition of objects engages lateral areas in both hemispheres

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Bilalić, Merim ^a   Kiesel, Andrea ^b   Pohl, Carsten ^b   Erb, Michael ^a   Grodd, Wolfgang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EXPERIENCE; EYE MOVEMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL MEMORY; BRAIN MAPPING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551516870     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016202     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Grill-Spector K, Malach R (2004) The human visual cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci 27: 649-677.
2. Lewis JW (2006) Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscientist 12: 211-231.
3. Noppeney U (2008) The neural systems of tool and action semantics: a perspective from functional imaging. J Physiology 102: 40-49.
4. Goodale MA, Milner D (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. T Neurosci 15: 20-25.
5. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle MAGDJ, Mansfield RJW, eds. Analysis of Visual Behavior. Cambridge: The MIT Press. pp 549-586.
6. Martin A, Haxby JV, Lalonde FM, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG (1995) Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science 270: 102-105.
7. Miceli G, Fouch E, Capasso R, Shelton JR, Tomaiuolo F, et al. (2001) The dissociation of color from form and function knowledge. Nat Neurosci 4: 662-667.
8. Chao LL, Weisberg J, Martin A (2002) Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cereb Cortex 12: 545-551.
9. Mahon BZ, Milleville SC, Negri GAL, Rumiati RI, Caramazza A, et al. (2007) Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron 55: 507-520.
10. Noppeney U, Price CJ, Penny WD, Friston KJ (2006) Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. Cereb Cortex 16: 437-445.
11. Tranel D, Martin C, Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Hichwa R (2005) Effects of noun-verb homonymy on the neural correlates of naming concrete entities and actions. Brain Lang 92: 288-299.
12. Kellenbach ML, Brett M, Patterson K (2003) Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. J Cognitive Neurosci 15: 30-46.
13. Martin A, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (1996) Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379: 649-652.
14. Boronat CB, et al. (2005) Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Res 23: 361-373.
15. Canessa N, Borgo F, Cappa SF, Perani D, Falini A, et al. (2008) The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an FMRI study. Cereb Cortex 18: 740-751.
16. Rushworth MFS, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H (2006) Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 16: 1418-1430.
17. Saleem KS, Suzuki W, Tanaka K, Hashikawa T (2000) Connections between anterior inferotemporal cortex and superior temporal sulcus regions in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 20: 5083-5101.
18. Webster MJ, Bachevalier J, Ungerleider LG (1994) Connections of inferior temporal areas TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys. Cereb Cortex 4: 470-483.
19. Zhong YM, Rockland KS (2003) Inferior parietal lobule projections to anterior inferiortemporal cortex (area TE) in Macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex 13: 527-540.
20. Shallice T (1988) From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
21. Warrington EK, Shallice T (1984) Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107: 829-854.
22. Weisberg J, van Turennout M, Martin A (2007) A neural system for learning about object function. Cereb Cortex 17: 513-521.
23. Bilalić M, Langner R, Erb M, Grodd W (2010) Mechanisms and neural basis of object and pattern recognition - a study with chess experts. J Exp Psychol General 139: 728-742.
24. Bukach CM, Gauthier I, Tarr MJ (2006) Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework. T Cogn Sci 10: 159-166.
25. Bilalić M, McLeod P, Gobet F (2007) Does chess need intelligence - a study with young chess players. Intelligence 35: 457-470.
26. Charness N, Tuffiash M, Krampe R, Reingold E, Vasyukova E (2005) The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. App Cognitive Psychol 19: 151-166.
27. Campitelli G, Gobet F (2008) The role of practice in chess: A longitudinal study. Learning Ind Diff 18: 446-458.
28. Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cogn Psychol 4: 55-81.
29. De Groot A (1978) Thought and choice in chess. New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
30. Gobet F, de Voogt A, Retschitzki J (2004) Moves in mind: The psychology of board games. London: Psychology Press.
31. Kiesel A, Kunde W, Pohl C, Berner MP, Hoffmann J (2009) Playing chess unconsciously. J Exp Psychol: LMC 35: 292-298.
32. Saariluoma P (1990) Apperception and restructuring in chess players' problem solving. In: Logie RH, Erdos G, eds. Lines of Thought: Reflection on the psychology of thinking. New York: Wiley. pp 41-57.
33. Mill JS (1843) A system of logic. London: Parker.
34. Popper KR (1968) The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
35. Wason PC (1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Q J Exp Psychol 12: 129-140.
36. Henson R (2005) What can functional neuroimaging tell the experimental psychologist? Q J Exp Psychol A 58: 193-233.
37. Palmeri TJ, Gauthier I (2004) Visual object understanding. Nature Rev Neurosci 5: 291-303.
38. Bilalić M, McLeod P, Gobet F (2008) Why good thoughts block better ones: the mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cogn 108: 652-661.
39. Reingold EM, Sheridan H (in press) Eye movements and visual expertise in chess and medicine. In: SP Liversedge ID, Gilchrist S, Everling, eds. Oxford Handbook on Eye Movements;Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
40. Poldrack RA, Mumford JA (2009) Independence in ROI analysis: where is the voodoo? Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 4: 208-213.
41. Henson R (2006) What has (neuro)psychology told us about the mind (so far)? A reply to Coltheart. Cortex 42: 387-92.
42. Saariluoma P (1995) Chess Players' Thinking: A Cognitive Psychological Approach. London: Routledge.
43. Johnson-Frey SH (2004) The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. T Cogn Sci 8: 71-78.
44. Brambati SM, Myers D, Wilson A, Rankin KP, Allison SC, et al. (2006) The anatomy of category-specific object naming in neurodegenerative diseases. J Cognitive Neurosci 18: 1644-1653.
45. Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Tranel D, Hichwa RD, Damasio AR (1996) A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature 380: 499-505.
46. Chong TTR, Cunnington R, Williams MA, Kanwisher N, Mattingley JB (2008) FMRI adaptation reveals mirror neurons in human inferior parietal cortex. Curr Biol 18: 1576-80.
47. Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 201-215.
48. Shulman GL, Pope DLW, Astafiev SV, McAvoy MP, Snyder AZ, et al. (2010) Right hemisphere dominance during spatial selective attention and target detection occurs outside the dorsal frontoparietal network. J Neurosci 30: 3640-3651.
49. Levy I, Hasson U, Harel M, Malach R (2004) Functional analysis of the periphery effect in human building related areas. Hum Brain Mapp 22: 15-26.
50. Gobet F, Simon HA (1996) Templates in chess memory: a mechanism for recalling several boards. Cogn Psychol 31: 1-40.
51. Gobet F, Simon H (1998) Expert chess memory: Revisiting the chunking hypothesis. Mem 6: 225-255.
52. Gobet F, Lane PCR, Croker S, Cheng PCH, Jones G, et al. (2001) Mechanisms in human learning. T Cogn Sci 5: 236-243.
53. Ericsson KA, Nandagopal K, Roring RW (2009) Toward a science of exceptional achievement: attaining superior performance through deliberate practice. Annals New York Academy Sci 1172: 199-217.
54. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Roemer C (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 100: 363-363.
55. McGregor SJ, Howes A (2002) The role of attack and defense semantics in skilled players' memory for chess positions. Mem Cognit 30: 707-717.
56. Reingold EM, Charness N (2005) Perception in chess: Evidence from eye movements. In: Underwood G, ed. Cognitive processes in eye guidance. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp 325-354.
57. Reingold EM, Charness N, Pomplun M, Stampe DM (2001) Visual span in expert chess players: evidence from eye movements. Psychol Sci 12: 48-55.
58. Reingold EM, Charness N, Schultetus RS, Stampe DM (2001) Perceptual automaticity in expert chess players: parallel encoding of chess relations. Psychonomic Bull & Rev 8: 504-510.
59. Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC (1981) The nature of hemispheric specialization in man. Behav Brain Sci 4: 51-91.
60. Van Kleeck MH, Kosslyn SM (1989) Gestalt laws of perceptual organization in an embedded figures task: evidence for hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia 27: 1179-86.
61. Robertson LC, Lamb MR (1991) Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cogn Psychol 23: 299-330.
62. Robertson LC, Lamb MR, Knight RT (1988) Effects of lesions of temporalparietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. J Neurosci 8: 3757-3769.
63. Van Kleeck MH (1989) Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: new data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia 27: 1165-1178.
64. Helton WS, Warm JS, Tripp LD, Matthews G, Parasuraman R, et al. (2010) Cerebral lateralization of vigilance: a function of task difficulty. Neuropsychologia 48: 1683-1688.
65. Nebel K, Wiese H, Stude P, de Greiff A, Diener H, et al. (2005) On the neural basis of focused and divided attention. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25: 760-776.
66. Banich MT (1998) The missing link: the role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain Cogn 36: 128-157.
67. Liederman J (1998) The Dynamics of Interhemispheric Collaboration and Hemispheric. Control Brain Cogn 36: 193-208.
68. Weissman DH, Banich MT (2000) The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology 14: 41-59.
69. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA, Mangun GR, Gazzaniga MS (1989) Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients. Nature 342: 543-545.
70. Scalf PE, Banich MT, Kramer AF, Narechania K, Simon CD (2007) Double take: parallel processing by the cerebral hemispheres reduces attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33: 298-329.
71. Campitelli G, Gobet F, Head K, Buckley M, Parker A (2007) Brain localization of memory chunks in chessplayers. Int J Neurosci 117: 1641-59.
72. Pesenti M, Zago L, Crivello F, Mellet L, Samson D, et al. (2001) Mental calculation in a prodigy is sustained by right prefrontal and medial temporal areas. Nat Neurosci 4: 103-107.
73. Ericsson KA, Lehmann AC (1996) Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Ann Rev Psychol 47: 273-305.
74. Bilalić M, McLeod P, Gobet F (2008) Inflexibility of experts - Reality or myth? Quantifying the Einstellung effect in chess masters. Cogn Psychol 56: 73-102.
75. Bilalić M, McLeod P, Gobet F (2009) Specialization effect and its influence on memory and problem solving in expert chess players. Cogn Sci 33: 1117-114.
76. Bilalić M, McLeod P, Gobet F (2008) Inflexibility of experts - Reality or myth? Quantifying the Einstellung effect in chess masters. Cogn Psychol 56: 73-102.
77. Campitelli G, Gobet F, Parker A (2005) Structure and stimulus familiarity: a study of memory in chess-players with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Spanish J Psychol 8: 238-245.
78. Campitelli G, Parker A, Head K, Gobet F (2008) Left lateralization in autobiographical memory: an fMRI study using the expert archival paradigm. Int J Neurosci 118: 191-209.
79. Elo A (1978) The rating of chessplayers, past and present. New York: Arco.