Developers' perceptions of object-oriented frameworks - An investigation into the impact of technological and individual characteristics

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 730-740

  Polančič, Gregor ^a   Heričko, Marjan ^a   Pavlič, Luka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARIBOR   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Developer's perceptions; Empirical research; Individual differences; Object oriented frameworks; System characteristics; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPER'S PERCEPTIONS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; OBJECT-ORIENTED FRAMEWORKS; SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

RESEARCH;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 79551496446     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. J.C. Anderson, and D.W. Gerbing Structural equation modeling in practice - A review and recommended 2-step approach Psychological Bulletin 103 3 1988 411 423
2. D.R. Bacon, P.L. Sauer, and M. Young Composite reliability in structural equations modeling Educational and Psychological Measurement 55 3 1995 394 406
3. Batory, D.; Cardone, R.; Smaragdakis, Y. (2000). Object-oriented frameworks and product lines. In: P. Donohoe (Ed.), First software product line conference (pp. 227-247).
4. G. Bockle, P. Clements, J.D. McGregor, D. Muthig, and K. Schmid Calculating ROI for software product lines IEEE Software 21 3 2004 23 31
5. B. Boehm Managing software productivity and reuse Computer 32 9 1999 111 113
6. J. Bosch, M. Peter, M. Mattsson, and P. Bengtsson Object-oriented framework-based software development: Problems and experiences ACM Computing Surveys 32 2000
7. Carva, J. P.; Franch, X. (2006). Extending the ISO/IEC 9126-1 quality model with non-technical factors for COTS components selection. In: International workshop on Software quality (pp. 9-14).
8. Cechticky, V.; Chevalley, P.; Pasetti, A.; Schaufelberger, W. (2003). A generative approach to framework instantiation. In: Generative programming and component engineering 2003, proceedings Vol. 2830 (pp. 267-286).
9. P.Y.K. Chau An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers Information and Management 30 6 1996 269 280
10. G.A. Churchill Paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs Journal of Marketing Research 16 1 1979 64 73
11. H.C. Cunningham, Y. Liu, and C.H. Zhang Using classic problems to teach Java framework design Science of Computer Programming 59 1-2 2006 147 169
12. F.D. Davis User acceptance of information technology - System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38 3 1993 475 487
13. F.D. Davis Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Quarterly 13 3 1989 318 331
14. Deursen, A. V. (1997). Domain - Specific languages versus object-oriented frameworks: A financial engineering case study. In: STJA' 97 (pp. 35-39). Ilmenau Technical University.
15. M.T. Dishaw, and D.M. Strong Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs Information and Management 36 1 1999 9 21
16. M. Fayad, and D. Hamu Enterprise frameworks: Guidelines for selection ACM Computing Survey 32 1 2000 4
17. M.E. Fayad, and D.C. Schmidt Object-oriented application frameworks Communications of the Acm 40 10 1997 32 38
18. Fontoura, M. F. (1999). Object-oriented application frameworks: The untold story. In: Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications (OOPSLA'99).
19. C. Fornell, and D.F. Larcker Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error Journal of Marketing Research 18 1 1981 39 50
20. W.B. Frakes, and K. Kang Software reuses research: Status and future IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 7 2005 529 536
21. Freimut, B.; Punter, T.; Biffl, S.; Ciolkowski, M. (2002). State-of-the-art in empirical studies, Virtuelles Software Engineering Kompetenzzentrum.
22. Froehlich, G.; Hoover, J.; Liu, L.; Sorenson, P. (1998). Designing object-oriented frameworks. In: CRC handbook of object technology. CRC Press.
23. D.L. Goodhue, and R.L. Thompson Task-technology fit and individual-performance MIS Quarterly 19 2 1995 213 236
24. C. Guido, B. Francesco, and V. Andrea The evaluation of framework reusability SIGAPP Application on Computer Review 5 2 1997 21 27
25. S.J. Hong, J.Y.L. Thong, and K.Y. Tam Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet Decision Support Systems 42 3 2006 1819 1834
26. W.Y. Hong, J.Y.L. Thong, W.M. Wong, and K.Y. Tam Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics Journal of Management Information Systems 18 3 2001 97 124
27. ISO 9126 (2001). ISO/IEC TR 9126-software engineering, product quality, quality model. International Organization for Standardization.
28. M. Keil, P.M. Beranek, and B.R. Konsynski Usefulness and ease of use - Field-study evidence regarding task considerations Decision Support Systems 13 1 1995 75 91
29. W.R. King, and J. He A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model Information and Management 43 6 2006 740 755
30. I.M. Klopping, and E. McKinney Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal 22 1 2004
31. Landin, N.; Niklasson, A. (1995). Development of object-oriented frameworks. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, Department of Communication Systems.
32. P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model Information and Management 40 3 2003 191 204
33. S.A. Mamrak, and S. Sinha A case study: Productivity and quality gains using an object-oriented framework Software - Practice and Experience 29 6 1999 501 518
34. Manolescu, D.; Noble, J.; Voelter, M. (2006). Patterns for successful object-oriented framework development. In: Pattern Languages of Program Design 5 (1st ed.) (pp. 401-431). Addison Wesley Professional.
35. I. Mathias, T.C. de Oliveira, and C.J.P. de Lucena A framework instantiation approach based on the features model Journal of Systems and Software 73 2 2004 333 349
36. Mattsson, M. (1996). Object-oriented frameworks, a survey of methodological issues. Lund University, Department of Computer Science.
37. Mattsson, M.; Bosch, J. (2006). Characterizing stability in evolving frameworks. In: Proceedings of TOOLS Europe (Vol. 99), (pp. 118-130).
38. McBurney, D. H.; White, T. L. (2003). Research methods (6th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
39. Meier, P. (1998). Critical success factors of object oriented frameworks. In: STJA 98.
40. V. Mellarkod, R. Appan, D.R. Jones, and K. Sherif A multi-level analysis of factors affecting software developers' intention to reuse software assets: An empirical investigation Information and Management 44 7 2007 613 625
41. Menzies, T. (2003). More success and failure factors in software reuse.
42. G.C. Moore, and I. Benbasat Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation Information Systems research 2 3 1991 192 222
43. M. Morisio, M. Ezran, and C. Tully Success and failure factors in software reuse IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 4 2002 340 357
44. S. Moser, and O. Nierstrasz The effect of object-oriented frameworks on developer productivity Computer 29 9 1996 45
45. D.L. Nelson Individual adjustment to information-driven technologies - A critical-review MIS Quarterly 14 1 1990 79 98
46. T.C. Oliveira, P.S.C. Alencar, I.M. Filho, C.J.P. de Lucena, and D.D. Cowan Software process representation and analysis for framework instantiation IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30 3 2004 145 159
47. W. Pree, G. Pomberger, A. Schappert, and P. Sommerlad Active guidance of framework development Software - Concepts and Tools 3 16 1998
48. Roberts, D.; Johnson, R. (1997). Patterns for evolving frameworks. in Pattern languages of program design (Vol. 3), (pp. 471-486). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc.
49. P.B. Seddon, S. Staples, R. Patnayakuni, and M. Bowtell Dimensions of information systems success Communications of AIS 2 3 1999
50. Shai, B. -Y. (1997). Pattern language for framework construction. In: The 4th pattern language of programming conference.
51. J.H. Sharp Development, extension, and application: A review of the technology acceptance model Information Systems Education Journal 5 9 2007
52. G. Sindre, R. Conradi, and E.A. Karlsson The reboot approach to software reuse Journal of Systems and Software 30 3 1995 201 212
53. S. Srinivasan Design patterns in object-oriented frameworks Computer 32 2 1999 24-+
54. H. Todd Development of successful object-oriented frameworks ACM 1997 115 119
55. Uebersax, J. S. (2006). Likert scales: Dispelling the confusion. 8-7-2008. Ref type: electronic citation.
56. J. van Gurp, and J. Bosch Design, implementation and evolution of object oriented frameworks: Concepts and guidelines Software - Practice and Experience 31 3 2001 277 300
57. V. Venkatesh Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model Information Systems Research 11 4 2000 342 365
58. V. Venkatesh, and F.D. Davis A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies Management Science 46 2 2000 186 204
59. V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, and F.D. Davis User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view MIS Quarterly 27 3 2003 425 478
60. J. Yu, I. Ha, M. Choi, and J. Rho Extending the TAM for a t-commerce Information and Management 42 7 2005 965 976