An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers

Information and Management

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 269-280

  Chau, Patrick Y K ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Acceptance; CASE; Systems developers

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; RESEARCH; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

PERSONAL COMPUTER UTILIZATION; SYSTEM DEVELOPERS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0030233013     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(96)01074-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Banker, R. and Kauffman, R., "Reuse and productivity in integrated computer-aided software engineering: an empirical study", MIS Quarterly 15(3), 1991, 375-401.
2. Baronas, A. and Louis, M., "Restoring a sense of control during implementation: how user involvement leads to system acceptance", MIS Quarterly 12(1), 1988, 111-126.
3. Beatty, C. and Gordon, J., "Barriers to the implementation of CAD/CAM systems", Sloan Management Review 29(4), 1988, 25-33.
4. Bollen, K.A., "Structural equations with latent variables", Wiley, New York, N.Y., 1989.
5. Burkhard, D., "Implementing CASE tools", Journal of Systems Management 40(5), 1989, 20-25.
6. Cheney, P., Mann, R. and Amoroso, D., "Organizational factors affecting the success of end user computing", Journal of Management Information Systems 3(1), 1986, 65-80.
7. Corbitt, G. and Norman, R., "CASE implementation: accounting for the human elements", Information and Software Technology 33(9), 1991, 637-640.
8. Davis, F., "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly 13(3), 1989, 319-340.
9. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P., "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models", Management Science 35(8), 1989, 982-1003.
10. Gattiker, U., Managing computer-based office information technology: a process model for management, in Hendrick, H. and Brown O.(eds.), Human Factors in Organizational Design, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984, 1, 395-403.
11. Hartwick, J. and Barki, H., "Explaining the role of user participation in information system use", Management Science 40(4), 1994, 440-465.
12. Huff, C., "Elements of realistic CASE tool adoption budget", Communications of the ACM 35(4), 1992, 45-54.
13. Igbaria, M., "User acceptance of microcomputer technology: an empirical test", Omega 21(1), 1993, 73-90.
14. Igbaria, M. and Chakrabarti, A., "Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use", Behaviour and Information Technology 9(3), 1990, 229-241.
15. Iivari, J., "An innovation research perspective on information system implementation", International Journal of Information Management 6, 1986, 123-144.
16. Iivari, J., From a macro innovation theory of IS diffusion to a micro innovation theory of IS adoption: An application to CASE adoption, in Avison, D., Kendall J. and DeGross, J. (eds.),Human, Organizational, and Social Diamensions of Information Systems Development, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993, 295-320.
17. Ives, B. and Olson, M., "User involvement and MIS success: a review of research", Management Science 30(5), 1984, 586-603.
18. Joreskog, K. and Sorbom D., LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software International, Hillsdale, N.J., 1993.
19. Keen, P., Shaping the Future: Business Design through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA., 1991.
20. Kemerer, C., "How the learning curve affects CASE tool adoption", IEEE Software 9(3), 1992, 23-28.
21. Kumar, K., Ongkasuwan, M. and Welke, R., "Do CASE tools improve the quality of system specifications and the productivity of the verification process?", Proceedings of the 2nd International Meeting Decision Sciences Institute, Seoul, South Korea, 1993, 82-85.
22. Kuo, P., "Computer aided software engineering (CASE) in Hong Kong - its market, requirement and tools assessment, Proceedings of 12th Conference of the South East Asia Regional Computer Confederation, October 1993, Hong Kong, 15-21.
23. Kwok, L. and Arnett, K., "Organizational impact of CASE technology", Journal of Systems Management 44(3), 1993, 24-28.
24. Lee, T., Chen, M. and Norman, R. "Computer-aided software engineering adoption and implementation: a theoretical analysis from an organizational innovation perspective", Proceedings of the 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA., 1991, 3-17.
25. Leonard-Barton, D., "Implementing structured software methodologies: a case of innovation in process technology", Interfaces 17(3), 1987, 6-17.
26. Leonard-Barton, D. and Deschamps, I., "Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology", Management Science 34(10), 1988, 1252-1265.
27. Mosley, V., "How to assess tools efficiently and quantitatively", IEEE Software 9(3), 1992, 29-32.
28. Norman, R., Corbitt, G., Butler, M. and McElroy, D., "CASE technology transfer: a case study of unsuccessful change", Journal of Systems Management 40(5), 1989, 33-37.
29. Porter, L. and Lawler, E., Managerial Attitudes and Performance, Irwin-Dorsey, Homewood, Il., 1968.
30. Ramiller, N., "Computer-aided software engineering: perceptions of technology, work, and management among I.S. Personnel, Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGCPR Conference, St.Louis, MO., 1993, 436-449.
31. Rasch, R.H. and Tosi, H.L., "Factors affecting software developer's performance: an integrated approach", MIS Quarterly 16(3), 1992, 395-413.
32. Robey, D., "User attitudes and management information system use", Academy of Management Journal 22(3), 1979, 527-538.
33. Rogers E. and Shoemaker, F., Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach, Free Press, New York, N.Y., 1971.
34. Rowe, J., "Can enforced standardization affect CASE usage?", Journal of Systems Management 44(3), 1993, 29-33.
35. Rupnik-Miklic, E. and Zupancic, J., "Experiences and expectation with CASE technology - an example from Slovenia", Information and Management 28(6), 1995, 377-391.
36. Saga, V. and Zmud, R., "The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion", IFIP Transactions A (Computer Science and Technology) 45, 1994, 67-86.
37. Stobart, S., Thompson, J. and Smith, P., "Use, problems, benefits and future direction of computer-aided software engineering in United Kingdom", Information and Software Technology 33(9), 1991, 629-636.
38. Thompson, R., Higgins, C. and Howell, J., "Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization", MIS Quarterly 15(1), 1991, 125-143.
39. Tornatzky, L. and Klein, K., "Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: a meta analysis of findings", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 29(1), 1982, 28-45.
40. H. Triandis, Attitude Change, Wiley, New York, N.Y., 1971.
41. Triandis, H., Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values , University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE., 1980, 195-259.
42. Vroom, V., Work and Motivation, Wiley, New York, N.Y., 1964.
43. White M. and Nelson D., "Organizational and Individual differences in learning perspectives during the technological innovation process", in Gattiker, U.(ed.), End-User Training (Studies in Technological Innovation and Human Resources), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1990, 1, 255-276.