SigG does not control gene expression in response to DNA damage in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

Journal of Bacteriology

Volumn 193, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1007-1011

  Smollett, Katherine L ^a   Dawson, Lisa F ^a,b   Davis, Elaine O ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLEOMYCIN; LEXA PROTEIN; MITOMYCIN C; OFLOXACIN; RECA PROTEIN; SIGMA FACTOR; SIGMA FACTOR SIGG; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIAL SURVIVAL; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENE INDUCTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; IC 50; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA DAMAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; SIGMA FACTOR;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS;

EID: 79551485095     PISSN: 00219193     EISSN: 10985530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01241-10     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cappelli, G., et al. 2006. Profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gene expression during human macrophage infection: upregulation of the alternative sigma factor G, a group of transcriptional regulators, and proteins with unknown function. Res. Microbiol. 157:445-455.
2. Cole, S. T., et al. 1998. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393:537-544.
3. Collins, L., and S. G. Franzblau. 1997. Microplate alamar blue assay versus BACTEC 460 system for high-throughput screening of compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1004-1009.
4. Darwin, K. H., and C. F. Nathan. 2005. Role for nucleotide excision repair in virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 73:4581-4587.
5. Davis, E. O., E. M. Dullaghan, and L. Rand. 2002. Definition of the mycobacterial SOS box and use to identify LexA-regulated genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Bacteriol. 184:3287-3295.
6. Davis, E. O., et al. 2002. DNA damage induction of recA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis independently of RecA and LexA. Mol. Microbiol. 46:791-800.
7. Domenech, P., and M. B. Reed. 2009. Rapid and spontaneous loss of phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PDIM) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis grown in vitro: implications for virulence studies. Microbiology 155:3532-3543.
8. Dullaghan, E. M., P. C. Brooks, and E. O. Davis. 2002. The role of multiple SOS boxes upstream of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis lexA gene - identification of a novel DNA-damage-inducible gene. Microbiology 148:3609-3615.
9. Durbach, S. I., S. J. Andersen, and V. Mizrahi. 1997. SOS induction in mycobacteria: analysis of the DNA-binding activity of a LexA-like repressor and its role in DNA damage induction of the recA gene from Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol. Microbiol. 26:643-653.
10. Fivian-Hughes, A. S., and E. O. Davis. 2010. Analyzing the regulatory role of the HigA antitoxin within Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Bacteriol. 192:4348-4356.
11. Gamulin, V., H. Cetkovic, and I. Ahel. 2004. Identification of a promoter motif regulating the major DNA damage response mechanism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 238:57-63.
12. Gopaul, K. K. 2002. Transcription of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis recA gene. University College London, London, United Kingdom.
13. Güthlein, C., et al. 2009. Characterization of the mycobacterial NER system reveals novel functions of the uvrD1 helicase. J. Bacteriol. 191:555-562.
14. Lee, J. H., D. E. Geiman, and W. R. Bishai. 2008. Role of stress response sigma factor SigG in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Bacteriol. 190:1128-1133.
15. Mahenthiralingam, E., et al. 1998. Site-directed mutagenesis of the 19-kilodalton lipoprotein antigen reveals no essential role for the protein in the growth and virulence of Mycobacterium intracellulare. Infect. Immun. 66:3626-3634.
16. Manganelli, R., E. Dubnau, S. Tyagi, F. R. Kramer, and I. Smith. 1999. Differential expression of 10 sigma factor genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 31:715-724.
17. Movahedzadeh, F., M. J. Colston, and E. O. Davis. 1997. Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LexA: recognition of a Cheo (Bacillus-type SOS) box. Microbiology 143:929-936.
18. Oatway, W. H. J., and W. J. Steenken. 1936. The pathogenesis and fate of tubercle produced by dissociated variants of tubercle bacilli. J. Infect. Dis. 59:306-325.
19. Papavinasasundaram, K. G., et al. 2001. Slow induction of RecA by DNA damage in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology 147:3271-3279.
20. Parish, T., and N. G. Stoker. 2000. Use of a flexible cassette method to generate a double unmarked Mycobacterium tuberculosis tlyA plcABC mutant by gene replacement. Microbiology 146:1969-1975.
21. Rand, L., et al. 2003. The majority of inducible DNA repair genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis are induced independently of RecA. Mol. Microbiol. 50:1031-1042.
22. Rao, A., and A. Ranganathan. 2004. Interaction studies on proteins encoded by the phthiocerol dimycocerosate locus of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Genet. Genomics 272:571-579.
23. Smollett, K. L., et al. 2009. Experimental determination of translational start sites resolves uncertainties in genomic open reading frame predictions - application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology 155:186-197.
24. Talaat, A. M., S. T. Howard, W. Hale IV, R. Lyons, H. Garner, and S. A. Johnston. 2002. Genomic DNA standards for gene expression profiling in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:e104.
25. Unniraman, S., M. Chatterji, and V. Nagaraja. 2002. DNA gyrase genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a single operon driven by multiple promoters. J. Bacteriol. 184:5449-5456.