Biomass direct chemical looping process: A perspective

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1252-1262

  Kobayashi, Nobusuke ^a   Fan, Liang Shih ^b  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomass energy; Carbon capture; Chemical looping process; Economic analysis; Energy conversion efficiency; Hydrogen production

Indexed keywords

BIO-MASS ENERGY; BIOMASS TECHNOLOGIES; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON CREDITS; CHEMICAL LOOPING; CHEMICAL LOOPING PROCESS; COMPETITIVE PRICES; COST-INTENSIVE; ENERGY GENERATIONS; FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT; FUEL CONVERSION; HIGH CONVERSION EFFICIENCY; HIGH MOISTURE; LOW ENERGIES; PRELIMINARY DESIGN;

BIOMASS; CONVERSION EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY CONVERSION; FOSSIL FUELS; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS;

BIOMASS POWER; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOSSIL FUEL; HYDROGEN; MOISTURE CONTENT; TRANSFORMATION;

EID: 79451471692     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. 3rd assessment report climate change 2001: the scientific basis 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. vander Linden, X. Dai (Eds.).
2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Special report: Land use, land-use change, and forestry 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R.T. Watson, I.R. Noble, B. Bolin, N.H. Ravindranath, D.J. Verardo, D.J. Dokken (Eds.).
3. Banuri T., Baker T., Bashmakov I., Blok K., Bouille D., Christ R., et al. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. 3rd assessment report climate change 2001: mitigation 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R. Pachauri (Ed.).
4. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Special reports: carbon dioxide capture and storage 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Metz, O. Davidson, L. Coninck, M. Loos, L. Meyer (Eds.).
5. Miller B.G. Coal energy systems 2005, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
6. World energy outlook 2004, International Energy Agency, OECD Publishing, Paris.
7. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. 4th assessment report climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bsch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (Eds.).
8. 2 into the Utsira formation. Energ Convers Manag 1995, 36:509-512.
9. Blunt M., Fayers F.J., Orr F.M. Carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery. Energ Convers Manag 1993, 34:1197-1204.
10. 2: the sleipner and GESTCO projects. Environ Geosciences 2001, 8:160-165.
11. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Natural and industrial analogues for geological storage of carbon dioxide 2009, IEAGHG, Cheltenham (UK).
12. 2 capture technology - The U.S. Department of energy's carbon sequestration program. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:9-20.
13. Fernando R. Coal gasification 2008, IEA Clean Coal Centre, London.
14. World energy outlook 2006, International Energy Agency, OECD Publishing, Paris.
15. Kohl A.O., Nielsen R.B. Gas purification 1997, Gulf Publishing, Houston.
16. 2 sequestratio technologies 2002 Sep, IEAGHG, Cheltenham (UK), Report No.:PH4/10.
17. Hendriks C. Carbon dioxide removal from coal-fire power plants 2007, Kkuwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
18. 2 from coal with commercially ready technology, Part A: performance and emissions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2005, 30:747-767.
19. 2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part B: economic analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2005, 30:769-784.
20. Koros W.J., Mahajan R. Pushing the limits on possibilities for large scale gas separation: which strategies?. J Membr Sci 2000, 175:181-196.
21. 2 gas separation membranes for the capture of carbon dioxide from power plant flue gases. J Membr Sci 2006, 279:1-49.
22. Eliasson B., Riemer P., Wokaun A. Greenhouse gas control technologies 1999, Pergamon, New York.
23. Audus H. Greenhouse gas mitigation technology: An overview of the CO2 capture and sequestration studies and futher activities of the IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programe. Energy 1996, 22:217-221.
24. 2 capture 2003 May, IEAGHG, Cheltenham (UK), Report No.: PH4/19.
25. Hoogwijk M., Faaij A.P.C., Van den Broek R., Berndes G., Gielen D., Turkenburg W. Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy. Biomass Bioenerg 2003, 25:119-133.
26. Renewables for fuels and electricity 1993, Island Press, Washington DC. B.J. Johansson, H. Kelly, A.K.N. Reddy, R.H. Williams (Eds.).
27. World energy outlook 2000, International Energy Agency, OECD Publishing, Paris.
28. McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 2002, 83:37-46.
29. Goldemberg J., Johanson T.B. World energy assessment: overview 2004 2004, UNDP, New York.
30. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96:673-686.
31. Dornburg V., Faaij A.P.C. Efficiency and economy of wood-fired biomass energy systems in relation to scale regarding heat and power generation using combustion and gasification technologies. Biomass Bioenerg 2001, 21:91-108.
32. Loo S.V., Koppejan J. The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing 2007, Earthscan, London.
33. Williams A., Pourkashanian M., Jones J.M. Combustion of pulverized coal and biomass, progress in energy and combustion. Science 2001, 27:587-610.
34. Saloski P. Technical constraints of co-combustion - experiences in Finland 1999, Proceedings of the Workshop on Technical Constrains; 1999 Jun 30-Jul 1; Zeltweg, Austria.
35. Kallner P. Technical constraints of co-combustion - experiences in Sweden 1999, Proceedings of the Workshop on Technical Constrains; 1999 Jun 30-Jul 1; Zeltweg, Austria.
36. Tillman D.A. Biomass cofiring: the technology, the experience, the combustion consequences. Biomass Bioenerg 2000, 19:365-384.
37. Faaij A.P.C. Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices. Energ Pol 2006, 34:322-342.
38. Zhang Q., Chang J., Wang T., Xu Y. Review of biomass pyrolysis oil properties and upgrading research. Energ Convers Manag 2007, 48:87-92.
39. Luo Z., Wang S., Liao Y., Zhou J., Gu Y., Cen K. Research on biomass fast pyrolysis for liquid fuel. Biomass Bioenerg 2004, 26:455-462.
40. Worasuwannarak N., Sonobe T., Tanthapanichakoon W. Pyrolysis behaviors of rice straw, rice husk, and corncob by TG-MS technique. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2007, 78:265-271.
41. Bridgwater A.V. Progress in thermochemical biomass 2001, vol. 2. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
42. th pilot plant. Ind Eng Chem Res 2003, 42:6755-6764.
43. Bridgwater A.V. Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chem Eng J 2003, 91:87-102.
44. th steam boiler fired with coal and natural gas-THERMIE demonstration project in Lahti, Finland. Power production from biomass III, gasification & pyrolysis R & D for industry 1999, 213-228. VTT Symposium 192; 1998 Spt 14-15, Technical Research Center of Finland, Espoo, Finland. K. Sipila, M. Korhonen (Eds.).
45. Kyritses editor. Proceedings of 1st World Conference & Exhibition on Biomass for Energy & Industry; 2000 Jun 5-9; Sevilla, Spain. London: Earthscan Publishers; 2001.
46. Solo K., Horwath A. Minnesota agri-power project (MAP). Power production from biomass III, gasification & pyrolysis R&D&D for industry 1999, 416-422. VTT Symposium 192; 1998 Spt 14-15, Technical Research Center of Finland, Espoo, Finland. K. Sipila, M. Korhonen (Eds.).
47. Stahl K. Varnamo-demonstration programme 1996-2000 2000, SYDKRAFT, Malmo (Sweden).
48. Chmielniak T., Sciazko M. Co-gasification of biomass and coal for methanol synthesis. Appl Energ 2003, 74:393-403.
49. McLendon T.R., Lui A.P., Pineault R.L., Beer S.K., Richardson S.W. High-Pressure co-gasification of coal and biomass in a fluidized bed. Biomass Bioenerg 2004, 26:377-388.
50. Lewis C.W. Efficiency improvements in bioenergy conversion systems. Energy Convers 1979, 19:125-131.
51. Richter H.J., Knoche K. Reversiblity of combustion processes, efficiency and costing second law analysis of processes 1983, vol. 235. ACS Symposium Series, 71-85.
52. Ishida M., Jin H. A new advanced power-generation system using chemical-looping combustion. Energy 1994, 19:415-422.
53. 2 capture. Adv Environ Res 2003, 7:335-345.
54. Hydrogen from coal program: research, development and demonstration Plan 2010, National Energy Technology Laboratory, DOE(US), Washington DC.
55. Fan L.S., Li F., Ramkumar S. Utilization of chemical looping strategy in coal gasificaton processes. Particuology 2008, 6:131-142.
56. Li F., Kim H.R., Sridhar D., Wang F., Zeng L., Chen J., et al. Syngas chemical looping gasification process: oxygen carrier particle selection and performance. Energ Fuel 2009, 23:4182-4189.
57. Li F., Zeng L., Fan L.S. Biomass direct chemical looping process: process simulation. Fuel 2010, 89:3773-3784.
58. Gupta P., Velazquez-Vargas L.G., Fan L.S. Syngas redox (SGR) process to produce hydrogen from coal derived syngas. Energ Fuel 2007, 21:2900-2908.
59. Li F., Fan L.S. Clean coal conversion proceses-progress and challenges. Energ Environ Sci 2008, 1:248-267.
60. How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment 2006 Jun, European Environment Agency, European Environment Agency, p. 67.
61. World energy outlook 2008, International Energy Agency, OECD Publishing, Paris.
62. Perlack R.D., Wright L.L., Turhollow A.F., Graham R.L., Stokes B.J., Erbach D.C. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply 1999, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.
63. Cushman J., Cooper L., Anderson P. 2003-Oak Ridge National Laboratory, bibliography on biomass feedstock research: 1978-2002 2003, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.
64. Kszos L.A., Downing M.E., Wright L.L., Cushman J.H., McLaughlin S.B., Tolbert V.R., et al. Bioenergy feedstock development program status report 2000, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.
65. Kharn A., Jong A.W., Jansens P.J., Spliethoff H. Biomass combustion in fluidized bed boilers: potential problems and remedies. Fuel Process Technol 2009, 90:21-50.
66. Robinson A.L., Junker H., Buckley S.G., Sclippa G., Baxter L.L. Interactions between coal and biomass when cofiring. Int Symp Combust 1998, 27:1351-1359.
67. Ince P.J. Estimating effective heating value of wood or bark fuels at various moisture contents 1977, U.S.Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, p. 9.
68. Kobayashi N., Piao G., Kobayashi J., Hatano S., Itaya Y., Mori S. A new pulverized biomass utilization technology. Powder Technol 2008, 180:272-283.
69. Gilbert P., Ryu C., Sharifi V., Swithenbank J. Effect of process parameters on pelletisation of herbaceous crops. Fuel 2009, 88:1491-1497.
70. Pentananunt R., Mizanur Rahman A.N.M., Bhattacharya S.C. Upgrading of biomass by means of torrefaction. Energy 1990, 15:1175-1179.
71. Milne T.A., Evans R.J., Abatzoglou N. Biomass gasifire " tars": their nature, formation, and conversion 1998 Nov, Golden(US): National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No.: NREL/TP-570-25357.
72. Elliott D.C. Relation of reaction time and temperature to chemical composition of hyrolysis oils. ACS symposium series. Pyrolysis oils from biomass 1988, p55-p65. ACS, Washington DC. E.J. Soltes, T.A. Milne (Eds.).
73. Dufour A., Girods P., Masson E., Rogaume Y., Zoulalian A. Synthesis gas production by biomass pyrolysis: Effect of reactor temperature on product distribution. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:1726-1734.
74. Han J., Kim H. The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification pyrolysis: an overview. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 2008, 12:397-416.
75. Baker E.G., Brown M.D., Elliott D.C., Mudge L.K. Characterization and treatment of tars from biomass gasifers 1988 Aug 21-24, Proceeding AIChE Summer National Meeting, Denver, p. 11.
76. Jenkins B.M., Baxter L.L., Miles T.R., Miles T.R. Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 1998, 54:17-46.
77. Demirbas A. Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Prog Energy Combus Sci 2004, 30:219-230.
78. Svoboda K., Siewiorek A., Baxter D., Rogut J., Puncochar M. Thermodynamic possibilities and constraints of pure hydrogen production by a chromium, nickel, and manganese-based chemical looping process at lower temperatures. Chem Pap 2007, 61:110-120.
79. Svoboda K., Siewiorek A., Rogut J., Baxter D. Thermodynamic possibilities and constraints for pure hydrogen production by iron based chemical looping process at lower temperatures. Energ Convers Manag 2007, 48:3063-3073.
80. Svoboda K., Siewiorek A., Baxter D., Rogut J., Puncochar M. Thermodynamic possibilities and constraints for pure hydrogen production by a nickel and cobalt-based chemical looping process at lower temperatures. Energ Convers Manag 2008, 49:221-231.
81. Handbook of fuel cell: fundamentals, technology, applications 2003, Wiley, Hoboken. W. Vielstich, A. Lamm, H.A. Gasteiger (Eds.).
82. Possibility of new biomass utilization technology system 2007 Mar, Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth, The Mechanical Social Systems Foundation, Tokyo, [Japanese].
83. 2 removal 2000 Dec, Electric Power Research Institute, The Institute, p. 396.
84. Updated cost and performance estimates for clean coal technologies including CO2 capture - 2004 2005 Mar, Electric Power Research Institute, Electric Power Research Institute, p. 104.
85. 2 capture and storage. Energ Pol 2007, 35:4444-4454.
86. Rhodes J.S., Keith D.W. Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage. Biomass Bioenerg 2005, 29:440-450.
87. 2 capture and storage. Renew Energ 2007, 32:1006-1019.
88. Peters M.S., Timmerhaus K.D., West R.E. Plant design and economics 2003, McGraw Hill, New York. 5th ed.