Topographic control of cell response to synthetic materials

Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 365-370

  Lim, Jung Yul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Anisotropic and isotropic topography; Contact guidance; Micro and nanotexture

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPIC TOPOGRAPHY; BIOMATERIAL SURFACES; CONTACT GUIDANCE; NANO-TEXTURE; NANOSCALE TOPOGRAPHY; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SUBSTRATE TOPOGRAPHY; TOPOGRAPHIC CONTROL;

ANISOTROPY; CELLS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TOPOGRAPHY;

CYTOLOGY;

EID: 79451469829     PISSN: 17382696     EISSN: 22125469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. AJ Engler, S Sen, HL Sweeney, et al, Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification, Cell, 126, 677 (2006).
2. RG Flemming, CJ Murphy, GA Abrams, et al, Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior, Biomaterials, 20, 573 (1999).
3. C Oakley, DM Brunette, The sequence of alignment of microtubules, focal contacts and actin filaments in fibroblasts spreading on smooth and grooved titanium substrata, J Cell Sci, 106, 343 (1993).
4. BW Stothard, AS Curtis, W Monaghan, et al, Role of the cytoskeleton in the reaction of fibroblasts to multiple grooved substrata, Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 31, 147 (1995).
5. ET den Braber, JE de Ruijter, LA Ginsel, et al, Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces, J Biomed Mater Res, 40, 291 (1998).
6. XF Walboomers, LA Ginsel, JA Jansen, Early spreading events of fibroblasts on microgrooved substrates, J Biomed Mater Res, 51, 529 (2000).
7. BW Stothard, A Curtis, W Monaghan, et al, Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography, Exp Cell Res, 223, 426 (1996).
8. XF Walboomers, W Monaghan, AS Curtis, et al, Attachment of fibroblasts on smooth and microgrooved polystyrene, J Biomed Mater Res, 46, 212 (1999).
9. L Chou, JD Firth, VJ Uitto, et al, Substratum surface topography alters cell shape and regulates fibronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion and assembly in human fibroblasts, J Cell Sci, 108, 1563 (1995).
10. MJ Dalby, MO Riehle, SJ Yarwood, et al, Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography, Exp Cell Res, 284, 274 (2003).
11. K Matsuzaka, M Yoshinari, M Shimono, et al, Effects of multigrooved surfaces on osteoblast-like cells in vitro: scanning electron microscopic observation and mRNA expression of osteopontin and osteocalcin, J Biomed Mater Res A, 68A, 227 (2004).
12. K Anselme, M Bigerelle, B Noel, et al, Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses, J Biomed Mater Res, 49, 155 (2000).
13. BD Boyan, LF Bonewald, EP Paschalis, et al, Osteoblastmediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography, Calcif Tissue Int, 71, 519 (2002).
14. SR Bannister, CH Lohmann, Y Liu, et al, Shear force modulates osteoblast response to surface roughness, J Biomed Mater Res, 60, 167 (2002).
15. JE Gough, I Notingher, LL Hench, Osteoblast attachment and mineralized nodule formation on rough and smooth 45S5 bioactive glass monoliths, J Biomed Mater Res A, 68A, 640 (2004).
16. F Luthen, R Lange, P Becker, et al, The influence of surface roughness of titanium on β1- and β3-integrin adhesion and the organization of fibronectin in human osteoblastic cells, Biomaterials, 26, 2423 (2005).
17. JA Schmidt, AF von Recum, Macrophage response to microtextured silicone, Biomaterials, 13, 1059 (1992).
18. AM Green, JA Jansen, JP van der Waerden, et al, Fibroblast response to microtextured silicone surfaces: texture orientation into or out of the surface, J Biomed Mater Res, 28, 647 (1994).
19. A Mata, C Boehm, AJ Fleischman, et al, Growth of connective tissue progenitor cells on microtextured polydimethylsiloxane surfaces, J Biomed Mater Res, 62, 499 (2002).
20. MJ Dalby, D McCloy, M Robertson, et al, Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths, Biomaterials, 27, 1306 (2006).
21. AI Teixeira, GA Abrams, PJ Bertics, et al, Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates, J Cell Sci, 116, 1881 (2003).
22. NW Karuri, S Liliensiek, AI Teixeira, et al, Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells, J Cell Sci, 117, 3153 (2004).
23. KA Diehl, JD Foley, PF Nealey, et al, Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration, J Biomed Mater Res A, 75A, 603 (2005).
24. DW Hamilton, MO Riehle, W Monaghan, et al, Articular chondrocyte passage number: influence on adhesion, migration, cytoskeletal organisation and phenotype in response to nanoand micro-metric topography, Cell Biol Int, 29, 408 (2005).
25. B Zhu, Q Lu, J Yin, et al, Alignment of osteoblast-like cells and cell-produced collagen matrix induced by nanogrooves, Tissue Eng, 11, 825 (2005).
26. F Johansson, P Carlberg, N Danielsen, et al, Axonal outgrowth on nano-imprinted patterns, Biomaterials, 27, 1251 (2006).
27. MJ Dalby, SJ Yarwood, MO Riehle, et al, Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands, Exp Cell Res, 276, 1 (2002).
28. MJ Dalby, D Giannaras, MO Riehle, et al, Rapid fibroblast adhesion to 27 nm high polymer demixed nano-topography, Biomaterials, 25, 77 (2004).
29. JY Lim, JC Hansen, CA Siedlecki, et al, Human foetal osteoblastic cell response to polymer-demixed nanotopographic interfaces, J R Soc Interface, 2, 97 (2005).
30. JY Lim, AD Dreiss, Z Zhou, et al, The regulation of integrinmediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography, Biomaterials, 29, 1787 (2007).
31. JY Lim, JC Hansen, CA Siedlecki, et al, Osteoblast adhesion on poly(L-lactic acid)/polystyrene demixed thin film blends: effect of nanotopography, surface chemistry, and wettability, Biomacromolecules, 6, 3319 (2005).
32. JC Hansen, JY Lim, LC Xu, et al, Effect of surface nanoscale topography on elastic modulus of individual osteoblastic cells as determined by atomic force microscopy, J Biomech, 40, 2865 (2007).
33. JM Rice, JA Hunt, JA Gallagher, et al, Quantitative assessment of the response of primary derived human osteoblasts and macrophages to a range of nanotopography surfaces in a single culture model in vitro, Biomaterials, 24, 4799 (2003).
34. AS Andersson, F Backhed, A von Euler, et al, Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production, Biomaterials, 24, 3427 (2003).
35. MJ Dalby, CC Berry, MO Riehle, et al, Attempted endocytosis of nano-environment produced by colloidal lithography by human fibroblasts, Exp Cell Res, 295, 387 (2004).
36. E Palin, HN Liu, TJ Webster, Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation, Nanotechnology, 16, 1828 (2005).
37. SJ Lee, SW Jeong, HC Kim, et al, Nanofibrous scaffold for tissue regeneration, Tissue Eng Regen Med, 5, 33 (2008).
38. SH Yun, YJ Kim, OK Kwon, et al, Fabrication and characterization of biodegradable nanofiber containing gelatin, Tissue Eng Regen Med, 5, 835 (2008).
39. EK Yim, SW Pang, KW Leong, Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage, Exp Cell Res, 15, 1820 (2007).
40. JY Lim, AD Dreiss, RC Riddle, et al, Nanotextured surfaces are biomimetic in stimulating osteoblastic differentiation of stem cells, 52nd Orthopaedic Research Society, Abstract no 946, Chicago, IL (2006).