Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: Implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 700-706

  Misch, Carl E ^a,b,e   Qu, Zhimin ^c   Bidez, Martha W ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c BioHorizons Incorporated   (United States)

^d and Radiation Oncology   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MARROW; HEALING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; JAW MALFORMATION; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; STANDARDIZATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TRABECULAR BONE; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 0033067941     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90437-8     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bidez MW, Misch C: Issues in bone mechanics related to oral implants. Implant Dent 1:289, 1992
2. Schnitman PA, Rubenstein JE, Whorle PS, et al: Implants for partial edentulism. J Dent Educ 52:725, 1988
3. Jaffin RA, Berman CL: The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in Type IV bone: A 5 year analysis. J Peridontol 62:204, 1991
4. Johns RB, Jemt T, Health MR, et al: A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7:513, 1992
5. Misch CE: Density of bone: Effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing and progressive bone loading. Int J Oral Implantol 6:23, 1990
6. Carter DR, Hayes WC: Bone compressive strength: The influence of density and strain rate. Science 194:1174, 1977
7. Brown TD, Ferguson AB Jr: Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur. Acta Orthop Scand 51:429, 1980
8. Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA, Dickie D, et al: Experimental determination of the orthogonal mechanical properties, density, and distribution of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions utilizing materials testing and computed tomography. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1986, p 42
9. Ashman RB, Rho JY: Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. J Biomech 21:177, 1988
10. Linde F, Norgaard P, Hvid I, et al: Mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Dependency on strain rate. J Biomech 24:803, 1991
11. Odgaare A, Linde F: The underestimation of Young's modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone specimens. J Biomech 24:691, 1991
12. Galante J, Rostoker W, Ray RD: Physical properties of trabecular bone. Calcif Tissue Res 5:236, 1970
13. th Annual Meeting 1991, p 131
14. Goldstein SA: The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: Dependence on anatomic location and function. J Biomech 20:1055, 1987
15. Linkow LI, Chercheve R: The tissues involved in implant procedures, in Linkow LI (ed): Theories and Techniques of Oral Implantology, St Louis, MO, Mosby, 1970, p 39
16. Lekholm U, Zarb GA: Patient selection and preparation, in Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds): Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 1985, pp 199-209
17. Misch CE: Bone character: Second vital implant criterion. Dent Today, June/July: 39, 1988
18. Atkinson PJ, Hallsworth AS: The changing pore structure of aging human mandibular bone. Gerodontology 2:57, 1983
19. Ashman RB, Rosinia G, Cowin SC, et al: The bone tissue of the canine mandible is elastically isotropic. J Biomech 18:17, 1985
20. Ashman RB, Van Buskirk WC: The elastic properties of a human mandible. Adv Dent Res 21:177, 1987
21. Brunski JB: Biomechanics of oral implants: Future research directions. J Dent Educ 52:775, 1988
22. Bidez MW, Misch CE: Force transfer in implant dentistry: Basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol 18:264, 1992
23. Linde F, Hvid I: The effect of constraint on the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 22:485, 1989
24. Hylander WL: Stress and strain in the mandibular symphysis of primates: A test of competing hypotheses. Am J Phys Anthropol 64:1, 1984
25. Jepsen A: A root surface measurement and a method for x-ray determination of root surface. Acta Odontol Scand 21:35, 1963
26. Robertson DM, Smith DC: Compressive strength of mandibular bone as a function of microstructure and strain rate. J Biomech 11:455, 1978
27. Martens M, Van Audekercke R, Delport P, et al: The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. J Biomech 16:971, 1983
28. Ralph WJ, Thomas CDL: Tooth support in the human mandible. J Oral Rehabilitation 15:499, 1988
29. Bidez MW, Berry JL, Theim JM, et al: Finite element analysis of an edentulous human mandible. 1st World Congress of Biomechanics, San Diego, CA, 1990
30. Hart RT, Hennebel W, Thongpreda N: Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Biomech 25:261, 1992
31. Linde F, Hvid I, Madsen F: The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 25:359, 1992
32. Harrigan TP, Jasty M, Mann RW, et al: Limitations of the continuum assumption in cancellous bone. J Biomech 21:269, 1988
33. Lemons JE, Phillips R: Biomaterials for dental implants, in Misch CE (ed): Contemporary Implant Dentistry, St Louis, MO, CV Mosby, 1993, pp 259-278
34. Becker W, Lekholm U, Dahler C, et al: The effect of clinical loading on bone regenerated by GTAM barriers: A study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9:305, 1995