A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 253-256

  Kinomoto, Yoshifumi ^a   Inoue, Yasuhiro ^a   Ebisu, Shigeyuki ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK Z250; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE PLUS; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE PLUS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL;

ADULT; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 7944225914     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hilton TJ. Direct posterior composite restorations. In: Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. A contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996;223-225.
2. Strand GV, Nordbo H, Tveit AB, Espelid I, Wikstrand K, Eide GE. A 3-year clinical study of tunnel restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:384-389.
3. McComb D. Systematic review of conservative operative caries management strategies. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1154-1161.
4. Hasselrot L. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7-year follow up study. Swed Dent J 1998;22:1-7.
5. Strand GV, Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR, Eide GE. Tunnel restorations placed in routine practice and observed for 24 to 54 months. Quintessence Int 2000;31:453-460.
6. Pilebro CE, van Dijken JWV. Analysis of factors affecting failure of glass cermet tunnel restorations in a multi-center study. Clin Oral Invest 2001;5:96-101.
7. Hunt PR. A modified Class II cavity preparation for glass-ionomer restorative materials. Quintessence Int 1984;10:1011-1008.
8. Knight G. The tunnel restoration. Dent Outlook 1984;10:53-57.
9. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: From first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:20s-25s.
10. Dunn WJ, Söderholm KJM. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 2001;14:297-303.
11. Gladys S, van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76:883-894.
12. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13:50-57.
13. Lundin SA, Koch G. Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years. Swed Dent J 1999;23:165-171.
14. Busato ALS, Loguercio AD, Reis A, de Oliveira Carrilho MR. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results. Am J Dent 2001;14:304-308.
15. Strand GV, Tveit AB, Gjerdet NR, Eide GE. Marginal ridge strength of teeth with tunnel preparations. Int Dent J 1995;45:117-123.
16. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for clinical valuation of dental restorative materials. US Public Health Service Publication No.790-244 San Francisco: Government Printing Office 1971.
17. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-58.
18. Pyk N, Mejàre I. Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:195-200.
19. Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. Tunnel restorations: A long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years. J Dent 1995;23:213-215.
20. Nicolaisen S, von der Fehr FR, Lunder N, Thomsen I. Performance of tunnel restorations at 3-6 years. J Dent 2000;28:383-387.
21. Strand GV, Tveit AB, Eide GE. Cavity design and dimensions of tunnel preparations versus composite resin Class II preparations. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:217-221.
22. Papa J, Cain C, M HH. Efficacy of tunnel restorations in the removal caries. Quintessence Int 1993;24:715-719.
23. Ratledge DK, Kidd EAM, Beighton D. A clinical and microbiological study of approximal carious lesions. Part 2: Efficacy of caries removal following tunnel and Class II cavity preparations. Caries Res 2001;35:8-11.
24. Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH, Wilson PR. Tunnel restorations versus Class II restorations for small proximal lesions: A comparison of tooth strengths. Quintessence Int 1993;24:93-98.
25. Wilkie R, Lidums A, Smales R. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years. Am J Dent 1993;6:181-183.