Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveableness

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 731-742

  Shockley, Kevin ^a   Carello, Claudia ^b   Turvey, M T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7944221542     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194968     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. AMAZEEN, E. (1997). The effects of volume on perceived heaviness by dynamic touch: With and without vision. Ecological Psychology, 9, 245-263.
2. AMAZEEN, E. (1999). Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 102-119.
3. AMAZEEN, E., & TURVEY, M. T. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 213-232.
4. ANDERSON, N. H. (1970). Averaging model applied to the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 1-4.
5. ARNOLD, V. I. (1989). Mathematical methods of classical mechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. ASHBY, G., & TOWNSEND, J. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
7. BACKUS, B. T. (2002). Perceptual metamers in stereoscopic vision. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems: Vol. 14. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. BELL, C. (1826). On the nervous circle which connects the voluntary muscles with the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 116, 163-167.
9. BORISENKO, A. I., & TAPAROV, I. E. (1979). Vector and tensor analysis. New York: Dover.
10. BUNGE, M. (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy (Vol. 3). Boston: Reidel.
11. CHARPENTIER, A. (1891). Analyse experimentale de quelques elements de la sensation de poids [Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception]. Archives de Physiologie Normales et Pathologiques, 3, 122-135.
12. CLARK, A. (2000). A theory of sentience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. CROSS, D. V., & ROTKIN, L. (1975). The relation between size and apparent heaviness. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 79-87.
14. DAVIS, C. M., & BRICKETT, P. (1977). The role of preparatory muscle tension in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 262-264.
15. DAVIS, C. M., & ROBERTS, W. (1976). Lifting movements in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 33-36.
16. DEN HARTOG, J. P. (1961). Mechanics. New York: Dover.
17. DRETSKE, F. (1995). Naturalizing the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. ELLIS, R. R., & LEDERMAN, S. (1993). The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 315-324.
19. FESTA, E., & WELCH, L. (1998). Perceived speed of motion metamers depend on component signal strength [Abstract]. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 39(Suppl.), 1983.
20. GIBSON, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22. GORDON, A. M., FORSSBERG, R. S., JOHANSSON, R. S., & WESTLING, G. (1991). Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 477-482.
23. GRANIT, R. (1972). Constant errors in the execution and appreciation of movement. Brain, 95, 649-660.
24. GREGORY, R. L. (1974). Concept and mechanisms of perception. New York: Scribner.
25. HANDEL, S. (1993). Listening. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. HARDIN, C. L. (1993). Color for philosophers. Indianapolis: Hackett.
27. HILBERT, D. (1992). What is color vision? Philosophical Studies, 68, 351-370.
28. JONES, L. A. (1986). Perception efforce and weight: Theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 29-42.
29. KIBBLE, T. W. B. (1985). Classical mechanics. London: Longman.
30. KINGMA, I., BEEK, P., & VAN DIEEN, J. H. (2002). The inertia tensor versus static moment and mass in perceiving length and heaviness of hand-wielded rods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 180-191.
31. KINGMA, I., SALVERSBERGH, G. J. P., & TOUSAINT, H. M. (1999). Object size effects on initial lifting forces under microgravity conditions. Experimental Brain Research, 124, 422-428.
32. KREIDFELDT, J. G., & CHUANG, M.-C. (1979). Moment of inertia: Psychophysical study of an overlooked sensation. Science, 206, 588-590.
33. LOFTUS, G., & RUTHRUFF, E. (1994). A theory of visual information acquisition and visual memory with special application to intensity-duration tradeoffs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 33-49.
34. MILLIKAN, R. (1984). Language, thought and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. MILLIKAN, R. (1993). White queen psychology and other essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. PAYNE, B., & DAVIS, R. C. (1940). The role of muscular tension in the comparison of lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 227-242.
37. RICHARDS, W., & RILEY, M. (1977). Texture metamers. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 67, 1401A.
38. ROSS, H. E. (1969). When is weight not illusory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 346-355.
39. ROSS, H. E., & GREGORY, R. L. (1970). Weight illusions and weight discrimination-A revised hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 318-328.
40. ROSS, P. W. (2001). The location problem for color subjectivism. Cognition & Consciousness, 10, 42-58.
41. SEKULER, R., & BLAKE, R. (1994). Perception (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. SHOCKLEY, K., GROCKI, M., CARELLO, C., & TURVEY, M. T. (2001). Somatosensory attunement to the rigid body laws. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 133-137.
43. SJÖBERG, L. (1969). Sensation scales in the size-weight illusion. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 10, 109-112.
44. SOLOMON, H. Y., & TURVEY, M. T. (1988). Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 404-427.
45. STEVENS, J. C., & RUBIN, L. L. (1970). Psychophysical scales of apparent heaviness and the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 225-230.
46. STROOP, M., TURVEY, M. T., FITZPATRICK, P., & CARELLO, C. (2000). Inertia tensor and weight-percept models of length perception by static holding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1133-1147.
47. TREUE, S., HOL, K., & RAUBER, E. J. (2000). Seeing multiple directions of motion-psychophysics and physiology. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 270-276.
48. TURVEY, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4, 173-188.
49. TURVEY, M. T., BURTON, G., AMAZEEN, E. L., BUTWILL, M., & CARELLO, C. (1998). Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 35-48.
50. TURVEY, M. T., SHOCKLEY, K., & CARELLO, C. (1999). Affordance, proper function and the physical basis of perceived heaviness. Cognition, 73, B17-B26.
51. TURVEY, M. T., WHITMYER, V., & SHOCKLEY, K. (2001). Explaining metamers: Right degrees of freedom, not subjectivism. Consciousness & Cognition, 10, 105-116.
52. WEBER, E. H. (1978). The sense of touch (H. E. Ross, Ed. & Trans.). London: Academic Press. (Original work published 1834)
53. WILLIAMS, D., TWETEN, S., & SEKULER, R. (1991). Using metamers to explore-motion perception. Vision Research, 31, 275-286.
54. ZEKI, S. (1983). Colour coding in the cerebral cortex: The reaction of cells in monkey visual cortex to wavelengths and colours. Neuroscience, 9, 741-765.