Perceptual metamers in stereoscopic vision

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  Backus, Benjamin T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; NEURONS; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

BEHAVIORAL MEASURES; CUE COMBINATION; HORIZONTAL DISPARITY; INTERESTINGNESS; NEURAL ACTIVITY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE; VISUAL STIMULUS;

EQUIVALENCE CLASSES;

EID: 84898945632     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Clark, J.J. and A.L. Yuille, Data fusion for sensory information processing systems. 1990, Boston: Kluwer.
2. Landy, M.S. et al., Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 1995. 35(3): p. 389-412.
3. Ogle, K.N., Induced size effect. I. A new phenomenon in binocular space perception associated with the relative sizes of the images of the two eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology, 1938. 20: p. 604-623.
4. Gårding, J., et al., Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations. Vision Res, 1995. 35(5): p. 703-22.
5. Backus, B.T. et al., Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Res, 1999. 39(6): p. 1143-70.
6. Banks, M.S. and B.T. Backus, Extra-retinal and perspective cues cause the small range of the induced effect. Vision Res, 1998. 38(2): p. 187-94.
7. Backus, B.T. and M.S. Banks, Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception, 1999. 28(2): p. 217-42.
8. Foley, J.M., Binocular distance perception. Psychol Rev, 1980. 87(5): p. 411-34.
9. Backus, B.T. and M.J. Nolt, Analysis of stereoscopic metamers. Journal of Vision (Vision Sciences conference supplement), 2001. 1: p. in press.
10. Stevens, K.A., Slant-tilt: The visual encoding of surface orientation. Biol Cybern, 1983. 46(3): p. 183-95.
11. Rogers, B.J. and M.F. Bradshaw, Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature, 1993. 361(6409): p. 253-5.
12. Mayhew, J.E. and H. Longuet-Higgins, A computational model of binocular depth perception. Nature, 1982. 297(5865): p. 376-378.
13. Calkins, D.J., J.E. Thornton, and E.N. Pugh Jr., Monochromatism determined at a long-wavelength/middle-wavelength cone- Antagonistic locus. Vision Res, 1992. 32(12): p. 2349-67.
14. van Ee, R. and C.J. Erkelens, Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Res, 1996. 36(1): p. 43-51.
15. Enright, J.T., Sequential stereopsis: a simple demonstration. Vision Res, 1996. 36(2): p. 307-12.
16. Schor, C.M., J. Gleason, and D. Horner, Selective nonconjugate binocular adaptation of vertical saccades and pursuits. Vision Res, 1990. 30(11): p. 1827-44.
17. Barlow, H.B., Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different backgound intensities. Journal of Physiology, 1958. 141: p. 337-350.
18. Wandell, B.A., Foundations of vision. 1995, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
19. Baylor, D.A., B.J. Nunn, and J.L. Schnapf, Spectral sensitivity of cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. J Physiol, 1987. 390: p. 145-60.
20. Loftus, G.R. and E. Ruthruff, A theory of visual information acquisition and visual memory with special application to intensity-duration trade-offs. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 1994. 20(1): p. 33-49.