The Syntax of Sentential Stress

The Syntax of Sentential Stress

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-212

  Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Focus stress; Focus stress rule; Information structure; Multiple spell out; Nuclear stress; Phases; Sentential stress; Sentential stress rule; Syntax phonology interface

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251635127     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219230.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (230)

1. Adger, D. 2002. Syntax and prosody in Scottish Gaelic. Paper presented at the VSO Workshop, Stuttgart.
2. Adger, D. 2003. Stress and Phasal Syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33(3-4): 238-66.
3. Alboiu, G. 2002. The Features of Movement in Romanian. Bucharest University Press.
4. Alexiadou, A. and E. Anagnostopoulou. 2001. Syntactic adjacency as a condition on phases. Paper presented at GLOW 24, Braga, Portugal.
5. Androutsopoulou, A. 1997. Split-DPs, focus and scrambling in Modern Greek. Proceedings of WCCFL 16: 1-16.
6. Aoun, J. and Y.-H. A. Li. 1989. Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 141-72.
7. Arregi, K. 2003. Nuclear stress and syntactic structures. Paper presented at the 1st North American Syntax Conference, Concordia University.
8. Baker, M. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Baltazani, M. 2002. Quantifier scope and the role of intonation in Greek. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
10. Barbiers, S. 1995. The syntax of interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden.
11. Barss, A. and H. Lasnik. 1986. A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347-54.
12. Belletti, A. 2001. Inversion as focalization. In A. Hulk and J. Y. Pollock, eds., Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 60- 90.
13. Belletti, A. 2002. Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi, ed., The Structure of IP and CP: the Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 16- 52.
14. Benincà, P. and C. Poletto. In press. Topic, focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers. In A. Belletti and L. Rizzi, eds., Proceedings of the Workshop on the Cartography of Syntactic Positions and Semantic types. Certosa di Pontignano, November 1999.
15. Boeckx, C. and N. Hornstein. 2004. Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 431-52.
16. Bolinger, D. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14: 109-49.
17. Bolinger, D. 1961. Ambiguities in pitch accent. Word 17: 309-17.
18. Bolinger, D. 1972. Accent is predictable (if you're a mind reader). Language 48: 633-44.
19. Bonet, E. 1990. Subjects in Catalan. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 1-26.
20. Borer, H. 1994. The projection of arguments. In E. Benedicto and J. Runner, eds., University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: Functional Projections. GSLA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
21. Bošković, Ž. 1997. Superiority effects with multiple wh-fronting in Serbo-Croatian. Lingua 102: 1-20.
22. Bresnan, J. 1971. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language 47(2): 257-81.
23. Bresnan, J. 1972. Stress and syntax: a reply. Language 48(2): 326-42.
24. Brody, M. 1997. Mirror theory. MS., University College London.
25. Browning, M. A. and E. Karimi. 1994. Scrambling to object position in Persian. In N. Corver and H. van Riemsdijk, eds., Studies in Scrambling. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 61- 100.
26. Brunetti, L. 2003. A unification of focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florence.
27. Büring, D. 1997. The Meaning of Topic and Focus-the 59th Street Bridge Accent. London: Routledge.
28. Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: a Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
29. Butler, J. 2003. Phase structure is event structure. Paper presented at the "Phases and the EPP" workshop, MIT.
30. Carlson, G. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
31. Chafe, W. 1973. Language and memory. Language 49: 261-81.
32. Chafe, W. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In C. Li, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 25- 56.
33. Chomsky, N. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits, eds., Semantics: an Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183- 216.
34. Chomsky, N. 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2: 303-51.
35. Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
36. Chomsky, N. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale and S. Keyser, eds., The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1- 52.
37. Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
38. Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka, eds., Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge: MIT Press, 89- 155.
39. Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1- 52.
40. Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
41. Chomsky, N. and H. Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425-504.
42. Cinque, G. 1990. Ergative adjectives and the Lexicalist Hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 1-40.
43. Cinque, G. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239-97.
44. Cinque, G. 1996. The antisymmetric programme: theoretical and typological implications. Journal of Linguistics 32: 447-64.
45. Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: a Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Cinque, G. 2000. On Greenberg's Universal 20 and the Semitic DP. The University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 10(2): 45-61.
47. Cinque, G. 2002. Complement and adverbial PPs: implications for clause structure. Paper presented at CONSOLE XI. Universit di Padova.
48. Cinque, G. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114: 683-710.
49. Collins, C. 2002. Eliminating labels. In S. Epstein and D. Seely, eds., Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell, 42- 64.
50. Contréras, H. 1976. A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
51. Cooper, W. E. and J. Paccia-Cooper. 1980. Syntax and Speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
52. Corver, N. 1990. The syntax of left branch extraction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tilburg.
53. Cowper, E. and D. C. Hall. 2001. Overriding the phase. Paper presented at the Canadian Linguistic Association annual meeting, Quebec.
54. Culicover, P. and M. Rochemont. 1983. Stress and focus in English. Language 59: 123-165.
55. Dabir-Moghaddam, M. 1982. Passives in Persian. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12(1): 63-90.
56. Dabir-Moghaddam, M. 1992. On the (in)dependence of syntax and pragmatics: evidence from the postposition -rā in Persian. In D. Stein, ed., Cooperating with Written Texts: the Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 549- 73.
57. Daneš, F. 1967. Order of elements and sentence intonation. To Honour Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. The Hague: Mouton, 400-512.
58. Dezsö, L. 1974. Topics in syntactic typology. In M. Romportl, V. Skalicka, L. Popela, and B. Palek, eds., Linguistica Generalia. Vol. 1: Studies in Linguistic Typology. Prague: Charles University, 191- 210.
59. Dezsö, L. 1977. Toward a typology of theme and rheme: SOV languages. In M.-E. Conte, A. Ramat, and P. Ramat, eds., Wortstellung and Bedeutung. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 3- 11.
60. Dezsö, L. 1982. Studies in Syntactic Typology and Contrastive Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.
61. Diesing, M. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press.
62. Dikken, M. den. 2003. On the morphosyntax of wh-movement. In C. Boeckx and K. Grohmann, eds., Multiple wh-fronting. Linguistics Today 64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 77-98.
63. Dixon, R. M. W. 1977a. A Grammar of Yidin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Dixon, R. M. W. 1977b. Some phonological rules of Yidinnn. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 1-34.
65. Domínguez, L. 2004. Intonation and word order in focus constructions in Spanish. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America annual meeting, Boston.
66. Donati, C., and M. Nespor. 2003. From focus to syntax. In A. Goskel and S. Ozsoy, eds., Lingua 113: 1119-42.
67. Donegan, P. and D. Stampe. 1983. Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. In The Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, 337-353.
68. Enç, M. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1-25.
69. Ernst, T. 2001. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1998. The syntax-focus structure interface. In P. Culicover and L. McNally, eds., The Limits of Syntax. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 29: 211-40.
71. Everaert, M. 1992. Auxiliary selection in idiomatic constructions. Ms., Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
72. Frascarelli, M. 2000. The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
73. Frascarelli, M. In press. L'interpretazione del focus e la portata degli operatori sintattici. In Atti del Convegno Nazionale Il Parlato Italiano.
74. Frota, S. 1995. On the prosody of intonation of focus in European Portuguese. Ms., University of Lisbon.
75. Ghomeshi, J. 1996. Projection and inflection: a study of Persian phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
76. Godjevac, S. 2000. Intonation, word order, and focus projection in Serbo-Croatian. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
77. Grice, M., M. D'Imperio, M. Savino, and C. Avesani. 2004. Strategies for intonation labelling across varieties of Italian. In S.-A. Jun, ed., Prosodic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 629- 83.
78. Grimshaw, J. 1987. Unaccusatives-an overview. In J. McDonough and B. Plunkett, eds., Proceedings of NELS 17. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 244-59.
79. Grohmann, K. 2003. Prolific Domains: on the Anti-locality of Movement Dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
80. Gussenhoven, C. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.
81. Gussenhoven, C. 1992. Sentence accents and argument structure. In I. M. Roca, ed., Thematic Structure: its Role in Grammar. Berlin and New York: Foris, 79- 106.
82. Gussenhoven, C. and S. J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical representation of syntactic relations. In K. Hale and S. Keyser, eds., The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge: MIT Press.
83. Gussenhoven, C. and J.-R. Vergnaud. 1987. An Essay on Stress. Cambridge: MIT Press.
84. Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part II). Journal of Linguistics 3: 199-244.
85. Halliday, M. A. K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
86. Harley, H. 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
87. Hayes, B. 1989. The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In P. Kiparsky and G. Youmans, eds., Rhythm and Meter. Orlando: Academic Press, 201- 60.
88. Hayes, B. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
89. Hayes, B. and A. Lahiri. 1991. Bengali Intonational Phonology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 47-96.
90. Holmberg, A. 1986. Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm.
91. Hoop, H. de. 1996. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. New York: Garland Publishing.
92. Hornstein, N. 2001. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
93. Horvath, J. 1986. Focus in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.
94. Hsiao, F. 2002. Tonal domains are stress domains in Taiwanese: evidence from focus. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42: 109-40.
95. Hyman, L. M. and J. R. Watters. 1984. Auxiliary focus. Studies in African Linguistics 15: 233-73.
96. Irurtzun, A. 2003. The intonational phonology of Errenteria Basque. Paper presented at the 1st Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia Conference, Lisbon.
97. Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
98. Jackendoff, R. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press.
99. Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100. Jacobs, J. 1991. Focus ambiguities. Journal of Semantics 8: 1-36.
101. Jelinek, E. and A. Carnie. 2003. Argument hierarchies and the mapping principle. In A. Carnie, H. Harley, and M Willie, eds., Formal Approaches to Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 265- 296.
102. Johnson, K. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 577-636.
103. Kadmon, N. 2001. Formal Pragmatics. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
104. Kahnemuyipour, A. 2001. On wh-questions in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46(1-2): 41-61.
105. Kahnemuyipour, A. 2003. Syntactic categories and Persian stress. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(2): 333-79.
106. Kahnemuyipour, A. and D. Massam. 2006. Patterns in phrasal movement: The Niuean DP. In H.-M. Gärtner, P. Law, and J. Sabel, eds., Clause Structure and Adjuncts in Austronesian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 125- 49.
107. Kaisse, E. 1985. Connected Speech. San Diego: Academic Press.
108. Kálmán, L. 1985. Word order in neutral sentences. In I. Kenesei, ed., Approaches to Hungarian 1. Szeged: JATE Press, 13- 23.
109. Karimi, S. 1990. Obliqueness, specificity, and discourse functions: râ in Persian. Linguistic Analysis 20: 139-191.
110. Karimi, S. 1996. Case and specificity: Persian râ revisited. Linguistic Analysis 26: 174-94.
111. Karimi, S. 2003. On object positions, specificity, and scrambling in Persian. In S. Karimi, ed., Word Order and Scrambling. London: Blackwell, 91- 124.
112. Karimi-Doostan, M.-R. 1997. Light verb constructions in Persian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex.
113. Kayne, R. S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.
114. Kayne, R. 1998. Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax 1: 128-91.
115. Kenesei, I. 1986. On the logic of word order in Hungarian. In W. Abraham and S. de Meij, eds., Topic, Focus, and Configurationality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143- 59.
116. Kidwai, A. 2000. XP-adjunction in Universal Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
117. Kim, A. H.-O. 1988. Preverbal focussing and type XXIII languages. In M. Hammond, E. Moravcsik, and J. R. Wirth, eds., Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 147- 69.
118. Kiparsky, P. 1966. Über den deutschen Akzent. Studia Grammatica 7: 69-98.
119. Kiss, K. E. 1998. Identificational focus and information focus. Language 74: 245-73.
120. Kiss, K. E. 2002. The Syntax of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
121. Koizumi, M. 1995. Phrase structure in Minimalist syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
122. Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85: 211-58.
123. Koster, J. 1987. Domains and Dynasties. Dordrecht: Foris.
124. Kratzer, A. 1991. The representation of focus. In A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich, eds., Semantics: an International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 831- 4.
125. Kratzer, A. 1994. On external arguments. In E. Benedicto and J. Runner, eds., Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachussetts, 103-30.
126. Kratzer, A. 1995. Stage level and individual level predicates. In G. Carlson and J. Pelletier, eds., The Generic Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 176- 223.
127. Kratzer, A. and L. Selkirk. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spellout: the case of verbs. the Linguistic Review 24: 93-135.
128. Krifka, M. 1984. Fokus, Topik, syntaktische Struktur und semantische Interpretation. Ms., Universität Tübingen.
129. Ladd, D. R. 1996. Intonational Phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
130. Lakoff, G. 1968. Pronouns and Reference. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
131. Lakoff, G. 1972. The global nature of the nuclear stress rule. Language 48(2): 285-303.
132. Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. New York: Cambridge University Press.
133. Larson, R. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-91.
134. Larson, R. 1990. Double objects revisited: reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 589-632.
135. Lazard, G. 1992. A Grammar of Contemporary Persian. Transl. from French by Shirley Lyons. Costa Mesa, Cal: Mazda Publishers.
136. Legate. J. A. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3): 506-16.
137. Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1986. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623-61.
138. Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1988. Non-eventer nominals: a probe into argument structure. Linguistics 26: 1067-83.
139. Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity at the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
140. Liberman, M. 1975. The intonational system of English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
141. McCarthy, J. and A. Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In G. Booij and J. Van Marle, eds., Yearbook of Morphology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 79- 153.
142. McGinnis, M. 2001. Phases and the syntax of applicatives. In M. Kim and U. Strauss eds., Proceedings of NELS, vol. 31. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.
143. Mahajan, A. 1990. The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
144. Manzini, M. R. 1995. Adjuncts and the theory of phrase structure. Ms., University of Florence.
145. Marácz, L. 1989. Asymmetries in Hungarian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
146. Megerdoomian, K. 2001. Event structure and complex predicates in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46(1-2): 97-125.
147. Megerdoomian, K. 2002. Beyond words and phrases: a unified theory of predicate composition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
148. Megerdoomian, K. 2007. The auxiliary clitic and sentential stress in Eastern Armenian. Paper presented at GURT 2007, Georgetown University: Washington, D.C.
149. Moltmann, F. 1989. Adjectives and argument structure in German. Ms., MIT.
150. Moyne, J. A. 1974. The so-called passive in Persian. Foundations of Language 12: 249-67.
151. Ndayiragije, J. 1999. Checking economy. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 399-444.
152. Neeleman, A. and T. Reinhart. 1998. Scrambling and the PF interface. In M. Butt and W. Geuder, eds., The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 309- 53.
153. Nespor, M. 1999. Stress domains. In H. van der Hulst, ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 117- 59.
154. Nespor, M. and I. Vogel. 1982. Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith, eds., The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part I. Dordrecht: Foris, 225-55.
155. Nespor, M. and I. Vogel 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
156. Nespor, M. and I. Vogel 1989. On clashes and lapses. Phonology 6(1): 69-116.
157. Newman, S. S. 1946. On the stress system of English. Word 2: 171-87.
158. Nilsen, Ø. 2000. The Syntax of Circumstantial Adverbials. Oslu: Novus.
159. Odden, D. 1984. Formal correlates of focusing in Kimatuumbi. Studies in African Linguistics 15: 275-99.
160. Odden, D. 1987. Kimatuumbi Phrasal Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 4: 13-26.
161. Odden, D. 1990. Syntax, lexical rules and postlexical rules in Kimatuumbi. In S. Inkelas and D. Zec, eds., The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 259- 77.
162. Paul, H. 1970 (1888). Principien der Sprachgeschichte/Principles of the History of Language. Trans. by H. A. Strong. College Park: McGrath Publishing Co.
163. Pearce, E. 2002. DP structure and DP movement in Maori. Paper presented at COOL5, University of Canberra, Australia. Ms., Victoria University of Wellington: New Zealand.
164. Peperkamp, S. 1997. Prosodic Words. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
165. Perlmutter, D. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society 157-89.
166. Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
167. Pesetsky, D. and E. Torrego. 2001. T-to-C movement: causes and consequences. In M. Kenntowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 355- 426.
168. Pinto, M. 1994. Subjects in Italian: distribution and interpretation. In R. Bok-Bennema and C. Cremers, eds., Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 175- 86.
169. Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.
170. Pollock, J.-Y. 1997. Notes on clause structure. In L. Haegeman, ed., Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 237- 79.
171. Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report 2, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Sciences.
172. Rackowski, A. and L. Travis. 2000. V-initial languages: X or XP movement and adverb placement. In A. Carnie and E. Guilfoyle, eds., The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 117- 41.
173. Reinhart, T. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
174. Reinhart, T. 1995. Interface strategies. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics, Utrecht University: Utrecht.
175. Reinhart, T. 1996. Interface economy: focus and markedness. In C. Wilder, H. M. Gaertner and M. Bierwisch, eds., The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory. Berlin: Akademic Verlag, 146- 69.
176. Richards, N. 2002. Very local A' movement in a root-first derivation. In S. Epstein and D. Seely, eds., Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Blackwell, 227- 48.
177. Ritter, E. and S. T. Rosen. 2001. The interpretive value of object splits. Language Sciences 23: 425-51.
178. Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman, ed., Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281- 337.
179. Rizzi, L. and L. M. Savoia. 1992. Conditions on/u/propagation in Southern Italian dialects: a locality parameter for phonosyntactic processes. In A. Belletti, ed., Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier, 252- 318.
180. Rochemont, M. 1986. Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
181. Rochemont, M. 1998. Phonological focus and structural focus. In P. Culicover and L. McNally, eds., The Limits of Syntax. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 29: 337-63.
182. Rooth, M. 1985. Association with Focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts: Amherst.
183. Rooth, M. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116.
184. Rooth, M. 1995. Focus. In S. Lapin, ed., The Handbook of Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell, 271- 97.
185. Samek-Lodovici, V. 2005. Prosody-syntax interaction in the expression of Focus. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 687-755.
186. Schauber, E. 1978. Focus and presupposition: a comparison of English intonation and Navajo particle placement. In D. J. Napoli, ed., Elements of Tone, Stress and Intonation. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 144- 73.
187. Schmerling, S. 1976. Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Austin: University of Texas Press.
188. Schwarzschild, R. 1999. Givenness, Avoid-F and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141-77.
189. Seidl, A. 2001. Minimal indirect reference: a theory of the syntax-phonology interface. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Routlege.
190. Selkirk, E. 1980a. Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In M. Aronof and M.-L. Kean, eds., Juncture. Saratoga, Cal.: Anma Libri, 107-29.
191. Selkirk, E. 1980b. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 563-605.
192. Selkirk, E. 1981. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In T. Fretheim, ed., Nordic Prosody II. Trondheim: Tapir, 111- 40.
193. Selkirk, E. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
194. Selkirk, E. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3: 371-405.
195. Selkirk, E. 1995. Sentence prosody: intonation, stress and phrasing. In J. A. Goldsmith, ed., The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 550- 69.
196. Selkirk, E. 2002. Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. Paper presented at Speech Prosody 2002, Aix-en-Provence, France.
197. Shlonsky, U. 2004. The form of Semitic nominals. Lingua 114(12): 1465-1526.
198. Sportiche, D. 2003. Reconstruction, binding and scope. Ms., UCLA.
199. Stechow, A. Von and S. Uhmann. 1984. On the Focus-Pitch Accent Relation. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 25: 223-263.
200. Stjepanović, S. 1999. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common? Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
201. Stroik, T. 1990. Adverbs as V-sisters. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 654-61.
202. Stump, G. 1985. The Semantic Variability of Absolute Construction. Dordrecht: Reidel.
203. Suñer, M. 1982. Syntax and Semantics of Spanish Presentational Sentence Types. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
204. Suñer, M. 2000. Object-shift: comparing a Romance language to Germanic. Probus 12(2): 261-89.
205. Svenonius, P. 2001. Case and event structure. In N. Zhang, ed., ZAS Working Papers 26. Berlin: ZAS.
206. Svenonius, P. 2002. Case is uninterpretable aspect. Proceedings of the "Perspectives on Aspect" workshop, Utrecht.
207. Szendroi, K. 2003. A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus. The Linguistic Review 20: 37-78.
208. Tamrazian, A. 1994. The syntax of Armenian: chains and the auxiliary. Doctoral dissertation, University College London.
209. Tancredi, C. D. 1992. Deletion, deaccenting, and presupposition. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
210. Tenny, C. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
211. Toman, J. 1986. A (word-)syntax for participles. Linguistische Berichte 105: 367-408.
212. Travis, L. 1988. The syntax of adverbs. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics. Special issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax 280-310.
213. Travis, L. 1991. Derived objects, inner aspect and the structure of VP. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society (NELS) 22. Amherst: University of Massachussetts, GLSA.
214. Travis, L. 1992. Inner aspect and the structure of vP. Cahier Linguistique de UQAM 1: 132-46.
215. Truckenbrodt, H. 1995. Phonological phrases: their relation to syntax, focus and prominence. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
216. Tuller, L. 1992. The syntax of postverbal focus constructions in Chadic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 303-34.
217. Uriagereka, J. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein, eds., Working Minimalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
218. Vahedi-Langrudi, M.-M. 1999. Passive with šod-an in Persian: a lexical and syntactic analysis. Paper presented at the 26th annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of Canada and the United States (LACUS), Edmonton, Canada.
219. Välimaa-Blum, R. 1993. Intonation: a distinctive parameter in grammatical constructions. Phonetica 50: 124-37.
220. Vallduví, E. 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland Press.
221. Vallduví, E. and E. Engdahl. 1996. The linguistic realisation of information packaging. Linguistics 34: 459-519.
222. Wagner, M. 2002. Configurational stress in derivatives, compounds and phrases. Ms., MIT.
223. Wagner, M. 2003. Linear order and phonological domains. Paper presented at the "Phases and the EPP" workshop, MIT.
224. Wagner, M. 2005. Prosody and recursion. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
225. Watters, J. R. 1979. Focus in Aghem. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7: 137-98.
226. Webelhuth, G. 1992. Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
227. Winkler, S. and E. Göbbel. 2002. Focus, p-movement, and the nuclear-stress rule: a view from Germanic and Romance (Review of Zubizarreta 1998). Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 40(6): 1185-1242.
228. Wurmbrand, S. 2003. Syntactic vs. post-syntactic movement. Paper presented at the Canadian Linguistic Association annual meeting, Halifax.
229. Xu, L. 2004. Manifestation of informational focus. Lingua 114(3): 277-99.
230. Zubizarreta, M. L. 1998. Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.