Predicting the effect of tray malalignment on risk for bone damage and implant subsidence after total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 347-353

  Wong, Jowene ^a   Steklov, Nikolai ^a   Patil, Shantanu ^a   Flores Hernandez, Cesar ^a   Kester, Mark ^b   Colwell Jr , Clifford W ^a   Dlima, Darryl D ^a  

^a SCRIPPS CLINIC   (United States)

^b STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS   (United States)

Author keywords

bone damage; finite element model; malalignment; subsidence; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE INJURY; BONE STRESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FORCE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALIDATION PROCESS; WALKING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE CEMENTS; BONE MALALIGNMENT; CADAVER; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GENU VARUM; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK FACTORS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIBIA;

EID: 79251568656     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21221     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB,. 1994. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299: 153-156.
2. Ryd L, Albrektsson BE, Carlsson L, et al. 1995. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77: 377-383.
3. Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Moran MC, Insall JN,. 1989. Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 15-19; discussion 19-20.
4. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, et al. 1999. Changes in knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14: 566-570.
5. Lotke PA, Ecker ML,. 1977. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59: 77-79.
6. Patil S, DLima DD, Fait JM, Colwell CW Jr., 2007. Improving tibial component coronal alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of a tibial planing device. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: 381-387.
7. Reed MR, Bliss W, Sher JL, et al. 2002. Extramedullary or intramedullary tibial alignment guides: a randomised, prospective trial of radiological alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84: 858-860.
8. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr., 1995. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321: 106-110.
9. Parratte S, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Pagnano MW,. 2008. Reproducing the mechanical axis did not improve the 15-year survival of 398 modern total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23: 316.
10. Murase K, Crowninshield RD, Pedersen DR, Chang TS,. 1983. An analysis of tibial component design in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 16: 13-22.
11. Vasu R, Carter DR, Schurman DJ, Beaupre GS,. 1986. Epiphyseal-based designs for tibial plateau componentsa-I. Stress analysis in the frontal plane. J Biomech 19: 647-662.
12. Bartel DL, Burstein AH, Santavicca EA, Insall JN,. 1982. Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64: 1026-1033.
13. Taylor M, Tanner KE, Freeman MA,. 1998. Finite element analysis of the implanted proximal tibia: a relationship between the initial cancellous bone stresses and implant migration. J Biomech 31: 303-310.
14. Perillo-Marcone A, Ryd L, Johnsson K, Taylor M,. 2004. A combined RSA and FE study of the implanted proximal tibia: correlation of the post-operative mechanical environment with implant migration. J Biomech 37: 1205-1213.
15. Dempsey AJ, Finlay JB, Bourne RB, et al. 1989. Stability and anchorage considerations for cementless tibial components. J Arthroplasty 4: 223-230.
16. Shirazi-Adl A, Patenaude O, Dammak M, Zukor D,. 2001. Experimental and finite element comparison of various fixation designs in combined loads. J Biomech Eng 123: 391-395.
17. Patil S, Steklov N, Colwell CW, et al. 2010. Effect of tibial tray malalignment on micromotion and subsidence. J Biomech (submitted).
18. Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA,. 1988. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 21: 155-168.
19. Schaffler MB, Burr DB,. 1988. Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. J Biomech 21: 13-16.
20. International Standards Organization. 2000. Standard number 14243-3: implants for surgery; Wear of total knee joint prostheses: part 3: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with displacement control and corresponding environmental conditions for test. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.
21. Pattin CA, Caler WE, Carter DR,. 1996. Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. J Biomech 29: 69-79.
22. Dendorfer S, Maier HJ, Taylor D, Hammer J,. 2008. Anisotropy of the fatigue behaviour of cancellous bone. J Biomech 41: 636-641.
23. DLima DD, Steklov N, Fregly BJ, et al. 2008. In vivo contact stresses during activities of daily living after knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 26: 1549-1555.
24. Hermida JC, Fischler A, Colwell CW Jr, DLima DD,. 2008. The effect of oxidative aging on the wear performance of highly crosslinked polyethylene knee inserts under conditions of severe malalignment. J Orthop Res 26: 1585-1590.
25. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ,. 2004. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 372-377.
26. Davies JP, Burke DW, OConnor DO, Harris WH,. 1987. Comparison of the fatigue characteristics of centrifuged and uncentrifuged Simplex P bone cement. J Orthop Res 5: 366-371.
27. Murphy BP, Prendergast PJ,. 2000. On the magnitude and variability of the fatigue strength of acrylic bone cement. Int J Fatigue 22: 855-864.
28. Rawlinson JJ, Peters LE, Campbell DA, et al. 2005. Cancellous bone strains indicate efficacy of stem augmentation in constrained condylar knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440: 107-116.
29. Rakotomanana LR, Leyvraz PF, Curnier A, et al. 1994. Comparison of tibial fixations in total knee arthroplasty: an evaluation of stress distribution and interface micromotions. Knee 1: 91-99.
30. Perillo-Marcone A, Barrett DS, Taylor M,. 2000. The importance of tibial alignment: finite element analysis of tibial malalignment. J Arthroplasty 15: 1020-1027.
31. Toksvig-Larsen S, Ryd L, Lindstrand A,. 1998. Early inducible displacement of tibial components in total knee prostheses inserted with and without cement: a randomized study with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80: 83-89.
32. Ryd L,. 1986. Micromotion in knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of tibial component fixation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 220: 1-80.
33. Nelissen RG, Valstar ER, Rozing PM,. 1998. The effect of hydroxyapatite on the micromotion of total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80: 1665-1672.
34. Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, Hozack WJ,. 2008. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty 23: 26-29.
35. Morgan EF, Keaveny TM,. 2001. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech 34: 569-577.