Cancellous bone strains indicate efficacy of stem augmentation in constrained condylar knees

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 440, Issue , 2005, Pages 107-116

  Rawlinson, Jeremy J ^a   Peters, Lance E ^b   Campbell, Deirdre A ^c   Windsor, Russell ^c   Wright, Timothy M ^d   Bartel, Donald L ^c  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Department of Biomedical Sciences   (United States)

^c HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^d Cornell University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CADAVER; CANCELLOUS BONE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; JOINT STIFFNESS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; WEIGHT BEARING; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOMECHANICS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MECHANICAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STRUCTURAL; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 27644489768     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000187340.10003.68     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Ashman RB, Rho JY, Turner CH: Anatomical variation of orthotropic elastic moduli of the proximal human tibia. J Biomech 22:895-900, 1989.
2. Bourne RB, Finlay JB: The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:95-99, 1986.
3. Ciarelli M, Goldstein S, Kuhn J, et al: Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and densities of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9:674-682, 1991.
4. Cowin SC: The Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone. In Cowin SC (ed). Bone Mechanics. Boca Raton, CRC Press, Inc. 97-127. 1989.
5. Donaldson WF, Sculco TP, Insall JN, Ranawat CS: Total condylar III knee prosthesis: Long-term followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:21-28, 1988.
6. Gabriel SM: Structural design and analysis considerations for posterior cruciate ligament sparing tibial components for total knee arthroplasty. PhD Dissertation. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University, 1993.
7. Genant H, Boyd D, Rosenfeld D, et al: Computed Tomography. In Conn S (ed). Non-Invasive Measurements of Bone Mass and Their Clinical Applications. Boca Raton, CRC Press, Inc 121-149, 1981.
8. Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery III W, Windsor RE: Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 77A: 1700-1707, 1995.
9. Hvid I, Bentzen SM, Linde F, et al: X-Ray quantitative computed tomography: The relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 8/9:837-844, 1989.
10. Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, et al (eds): Surgery of the Knee. Ed 2. New York, Churchill-Livingstone, 1993.
11. Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Kummer FJ, et al: The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:759-767, 2001.
12. Keaveny TM, Borchers RE, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC: Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry. J Biomech 26:991-1000, 1993.
13. Keyak JH, Lee IY, Skinner HB: Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: Use of different densitometric measures. J Biomed Mat Res 28:1329-1336, 1994.
14. Linde F, Hvid I, Madsen F: The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone specimens. J Biomech 25:359-368, 1992.
15. Morgan EF, Keaveny TM: Dependence of Yield Strain of Human Trabecular Bone on Anatomic Site. J Biomech 34:569-577, 2001.
16. Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD: Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:116-123, 1994.
17. Nazarian DG, Mehta S, Booth Jr RE: A comparison of stemmed and unstemmed components in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:256-262, 2002.
18. Odgaard A, Linde F: The underestimation of Young's Modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone specimens. J Biomech 24:691-698, 1991.
19. Rakotomanana RL, Leyvraz PF, Curnier A, et al: A finite element model for evaluation of tibial prosthesis-bone interface in total knee replacement. J Biomech 25:1413-1424, 1992.
20. Rubin PJ, Rakotomanana RL, Leyvraz PF, et al: Frictional interface micromotions and anisotropic stress distribution in a femoral total hip component. J Biomech 26:725-739, 1993.
21. Snyder SM, Schneider E: Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9:422-431, 1991.
22. Stern SH, Wills DR, Gilbert JL: The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:44-52, 1997.
23. Taylor M, Tanner KE: Fatigue failure of cancellous bone: A possible cause of implant migration and loosening. J Bone Joint Surg 798:181-182, 1997.
24. Vince KG, Long W: Revision knee arthroplasty: The limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317:172-177, 1995.
25. Weinans H, Sumner DR, Igloria R, Natarajan RN: Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. J Biomech 33:809-817, 2000.
26. Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Moran MC, Insall JN: Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:15-20, 1989.
27. Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, Milliano MT, White SE: The effect of central stem and stem length on micromovement of the tibial tray. J Arthroplasty 7(Suppl):433-438, 1992.
28. Zar JH: Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1999.