A histomorphometric study of nanothickness and plasma-sprayed calcium-phosphorous-coated implant surfaces in rabbit bone

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 556-561

  Quaranta, Alessandro ^a   Iezzi, Giovanna ^b   Scarano, Antonio ^b   Coelho, Paulo G ^c   Vozza, Iole ^b   Marincola, Mauro ^d   Piattelli, Adriano ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDAD DE CARTAGENA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Animal research; Biocompatible materials; Ceramics; Dental implants; Histology

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; NANOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMUR; IMPLANT; OSTEOBLAST; RABBIT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CERAMICS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMUR; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 77950666165     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090296     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-1539.
2. Butz F, Aita H, Wang CJ, Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006;85:560-565.
3. Thomas KA, Kay JF, Cook SD, Jarcho M. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21:1395-1414.
4. Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Hjörting-Hansen E, Jensen JS, Holmén A. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants: An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:77-84.
5. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6: 24-30.
6. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15: 668-674.
7. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:2-8.
8. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:117-129.
9. Khang W, Feldman S, Hawley CE, Gunsolley J. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J Periodontol 2001;72:1384-1390.
10. Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rebaudi A, Rao W, Testori T, Porter SS. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol 2003;74:945-946.
11. Coelho PG, Cardaropoli G, Suzuki M, Lemons JE. Early healing of nanothickness bioceramic coatings on dental implants: An experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:387-393.
12. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-564.
13. Coelho PG, Lemons JE. Physico/chemical characterization and in vivo evaluation of nanothickness bioceramic depositions on alumina-blasted/acid- etched Ti-6Al-4V implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;90:351-356.
14. Yang Y, Kim KH, Ong JL. A review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process - an alternative to plasma spraying. Biomaterials 2005;26:327-337.
15. Iezzi G, Scarano A, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Two human hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants retrieved after a 14-year loading period: A histologic and histomor-phometric case report. J Periodontol 2007;78:940-947.
16. McGlumphy EA, Peterson LJ, Larsen PE, Jeffcoat MK. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cy-lindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:82-92.
17. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2007;28: 4748-4755.
18. Ong JL, Bessho K, Carnes DL. Bone response to plasma sprayed hydroxiapatite and radiofrequency - sputtered calcium phosphate implants in vivo. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:581-586.
19. Leonard G, Coelho P, Polyzois I, Claffey N. A study of the healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:232-239.
20. Gottlander M, Albrektsson T. Histomorphometric studies of hydroxylapatite-coated and uncoated CP titanium threaded implants in bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:399-404.
21. Gottlander M, Albrektsson T, Carlsson LV. A histo-morphometric study of unthreaded hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium-coated implants in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:485-490.
22. Granato R, Marin C, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of a thin ion beam bioceramic deposition on plateau root form implants: An experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 90:396-403.
23. Lee JJ, Rouhfar L, Beirne OR. Survival of hydroxyap-atite-coated implants: A meta-analytic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:1372-1379.
24. Jeffcoat MK, McGlumphy EA, Reddy MS, Geurs NC, Proskin HM. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:406-410.
25. Vallecillo Capilla M, Romero Olid Mde N, Olmedo Gaya MV, Reyes Botella C. Zorrilla Romera C. Cylindrical dental implants with hydroxyapatite- and titanium plasma spray-coated surfaces: 5-year results. J Oral Implantol 2007;33:59-68.