A cationic ZnII porphyrazine induces a stable parallel G-quadruplex conformation in human telomeric DNA

Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 684-688

  Manet, Ilse ^a   Manoli, Francesco ^a   Donzello, Maria Pia ^b   Viola, Elisa ^b   Andreano, Giuseppina ^c   Masi, Annalisa ^c   Cellai, Luciano ^c   Monti, Sandra ^a  

^a Istituto per la Sintesi Organica e la Fotoreattività   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONAL EQUILIBRIUM; G-QUADRUPLEXES; HUMAN TELOMERIC DNA; PORPHYRAZINES; TELOMERIC SEQUENCES; WATERSOLUBLE;

ZINC;

CATION; DNA; GUANINE QUADRUPLEX; METALLOPORPHYRIN; TETRAKIS 2,3 (5,6 DI(2 (N METHYL)PYRIDINIUMYL)PYRAZINO)PORPHYRAZINATO ZNII; TETRAKIS-2,3-(5,6-DI(2-(N-METHYL)PYRIDINIUMYL)PYRAZINO)PORPHYRAZINATO-ZNII;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; TELOMERE;

CATIONS; DNA; G-QUADRUPLEXES; HUMANS; METALLOPORPHYRINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; TELOMERE;

EID: 79251514679     PISSN: 14770520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c0ob00598c     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. D. J. Patel A. T. Phan V. Kuryavyi Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 35 7429 7455
2. S. Burge G. N. Parkinson P. Hazel A. K. Todd S. Neidle Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 34 5402 5415
3. S. Balasubramanian S. Neidle Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009 13 345 353
4. Y. Qin L. H. Hurley Biochimie 2008 90 1149 1171
5. L. H. Hurley Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002 2 188 200
6. L. H. Hurley Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2001 29 692 696
7. A. De Cian L. Lacroix C. Douarre N. Temime-Smaali C. Trentesaux J. F. Riou J. L. Mergny Biochimie 2008 90 131 155
8. C. B. Harley Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008 8 167 179
9. D. F. Shi R. T. Wheelhouse D. Y. Sun L. H. Hurley J. Med. Chem. 2001 44 4509 4523
10. R. T. Wheelhouse D. K. Sun H. Y. Han F. X. G. Han L. H. Hurley J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998 120 3261 3262
11. D. Y. Sun B. Thompson B. E. Cathers M. Salazar S. M. Kerwin J. O. Trent T. C. Jenkins S. Neidle L. H. Hurley J. Med. Chem. 1997 40 2113 2116
12. S. Neidle Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009 19 239 250
13. T. M. Ou Y. J. Lu J. H. Tan Z. S. Huang K. Y. Wong L. Q. Gu ChemMedChem 2008 3 690 713
14. T. A. Brooks L. H. Hurley Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009 9 849 861
15. M. P. Donzello Z. P. Ou F. Monacelli G. Ricciardi C. Rizzoli C. Ercolani K. M. Kadish Inorg. Chem. 2004 43 8626 8636
16. M. P. Donzello Z. P. Ou D. Dini M. Meneghetti C. Ercolani K. M. Kadish Inorg. Chem. 2004 43 8637 8648
17. C. Bergami M. P. Donzello F. Monacelli C. Ercolani K. M. Kadish Inorg. Chem. 2005 44 9862 9873
18. C. Bergami M. P. Donzello C. Ercolani F. Monacelli K. M. Kadish C. Rizzoli Inorg. Chem. 2005 44 9852 9861
19. J. Alzeer B. R. Vummidi P. J. C. Roth N. W. Luedtke Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009 48 9362 9365
20. D. P. N. Goncalves R. Rodriguez S. Balasubramanian J. K. M. Sanders Chem. Commun. 2006 4685 4687
21. M. E. Anderson A. G. M. Barrett B. M. Hoffman J. Inorg. Biochem. 2000 80 257 260
22. Y. Wang D. J. Patel Structure 1993 1 263 282
23. G. N. Parkinson M. P. H. Lee S. Neidle Nature 2002 417 876 880
24. J. Li J. J. Correia L. Wang J. O. Trent J. B. Chaires Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 33 4649 4659
25. A. Ambrus D. Chen J. X. Dai T. Bialis R. A. Jones D. Z. Yang Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 34 2723 2735
26. K. Steenkeste M. Enescu F. Tfibel M. Perree-Fauvet M. P. Fontaine-Aupart J. Phys. Chem. B 2004 108 12215 12221
27. The buffer solution of the 22-mer solution was heated to 90 °C and then cooled down slowly before preparation of the mixtures.
28. R. D. Gray J. Li J. B. Chaires J. Phys. Chem. B 2009 113 2676 2683
29. A. Bugaut S. Balasubramanian Biochemistry 2008 47 689 697
30. A. N. Lane J. B. Chaires R. D. Gray J. O. Trent Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 36 5482 5515
31. J. Alzeer N. W. Luedtke Biochemistry 2010 49 4339 4348
32. We did not exceed an excess of 3 in ligand/22-mer molar ratio to avoid unspecific binding
33. J. T. Davis Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004 43 668 698
34. F. W. Smith F. W. Lau J. Feigon Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994 91 10546 10550
35. Higher order aggregation strongly affects the light transmission properties of the solutions, distorting the absorption signal vs. buffer, but perturbs much less the dichroic features that result from a differential measurement in which scattering is better compensated. According to this the ICD signals could be successfully analysed
36. G. N. Parkinson R. Ghosh S. Neidle Biochemistry 2007 46 2390 2397
37. L. G. Ren A. M. Zhang J. Huang P. Wang X. C. Weng L. X. Zhang F. Liang Z. Tan X. Zhou ChemBioChem 2007 8 775 780