Responsiveness and validity of two outcome measures of instrumental activities of daily living in stroke survivors receiving rehabilitative therapies

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 175-183

  Wu, Ching Yi ^a   Chuang, Li Ling ^b   Lin, Keh Chung ^b,c   Horng, Yi Shiung ^d,e  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d BUDDHIST TZU CHI GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e TZU CHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STROKE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STROKE;

EID: 79251485997     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215510385482     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000 ; 31: 142938.
2. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S., Cote R., Durcan L., Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 ; 83: 103542.
3. James AB Activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. In Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Schell BB. eds. Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy, eleventh edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2008, 53878.
4. Katz S. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc 1983 ; 31: 721 27.
5. Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Chen MH, Jush SD, Hsieh CL Evaluation of stroke patients with the extended activities of daily living scale in Taiwan. Disabil Rehabil 2000 ; 22: 495 500.
6. Lawton MP, Brody EM Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969 ; 9: 17986.
7. Ward G., Jagger C., Harper W. A review of instrumental ADL assessments for use with elderly people. Rev Clin Gerontol 1998 ; 8: 6571.
8. Jorgensen HS, Pedersen PM, Kammersgaard L., Raaschou HO, Olsen TS Epidemiology of stroke-related disability. In Duncan PW. ed. Clinics in geriatric medicine: stroke. Philadelphia: PA: WB Saunders, 1999, 785800.
9. Edwards DF, Hahn M., Baum C., Dromerick AW The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfaction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2006 ; 15: 15157.
10. Chong DK Measurement of instrumental activities of daily living in stroke. Stroke 1995 ; 26: 111922.
11. Salter KL, Teasell RW, Foley NC, Jutai JW Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007 ; 86: 100712.
12. Green J., Forster A., Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2001 ; 23: 67076.
13. Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, van Kuyk-Minis MA Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003 ; 17: 4029.
14. Hsueh IP, Hsieh CL A revalidation of the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke: A study in Taipei area. Formosan J Med 1997 ; 1: 696702.
15. Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc 2001 ; 100: 52632.
16. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H., Raaschou HO, Olsen TS Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997 ; 78: 16165.
17. Yohannes AM, Roomi J., Waters K., Connolly MJ A comparison of the Barthel index and Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale in the assessment of disability in chronic airflow limitation in old age. Age Ageing 1997 ; 27: 1997.
18. Schuling J., de Haan R., Limburg M., Groenier KH The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke 1993 ; 24: 117377.
19. Hsueh IP, Wang WC, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL Rasch analysis of combining two indices to assess comprehensive ADL function in stroke patients. Stroke 2004 ; 35: 72126.
20. Gladman JR, Lincoln NB, Adams SA Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1993 ; 22: 41924.
21. Gompertz P., Pound P., Ebrahim S. Validity of the extended activities of daily living scale. Clin Rehabil 1994 ; 8: 27580.
22. Nouri FM, Lincoln NB An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1987 ; 1: 3015.
23. Holbrook M., Skilbeck CE An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983 ; 12: 16670.
24. Piercy M., Carter J., Mant J., Wade DT Inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay activities index in patients with stroke and their careers. Clin Rehabil 2000 ; 14: 43340.
25. Post MW, de Witte LP Good inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003 ; 17: 54852.
26. Schepers VP, Ketelaar M., Visser-Meily JM, Dekker J., Lindeman E. Responsiveness of functional health status measures frequently used in stroke research. Disabil Rehabil 2006 ; 28: 103540.
27. Lin KC, Chang YF, Wu CY, Chen YA Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 ; 23: 44148.
28. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S., Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 ; 84: 95063.
29. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H., Knol DL, de Vet HC, Bouter LM Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2004 ; 35: 141014.
30. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences, second edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
31. Efron B., Tibshirani RJ An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
32. Stratford PW, Kennedy DM Does parallel item content on WOMAC's pain and function sub-scales limit its ability to detect change in functional status? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004 ; 5: 17.
33. Portney LG, Watkins MP Foundations of clinical research: application to practice, third edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health, 2009.
34. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. A comparison of the responsiveness of the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, London handicap scale and SF-36. Disabil Rehabil 2000 ; 22: 78693.
35. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. The validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Disabil Rehabil 2002 ; 24: 37177.
36. Fasoli SE. Assessing roles and competence. In Radomski MV, Trombly Latham CA. eds. Occupational therapy for physcial dysfunction, sixth edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2008, 6690.
37. Lindeboom R., Vermeulen M., Holman R., De Haan RJ Activities of daily living instruments: optimizing scales for neurologic assessments. Neurology 2003 ; 60: 73842.
38. Carod-Artal FJ, Gonzalez-Gutierrez JL, Herrero JA, Horan T., De Seijas EV Functional recovery and instrumental activities of daily living: follow-up 1-year after treatment in a stroke unit. Brain Inj 2002 ; 16: 20716.
39. Bond MJ, Clark MS, Smith DS, Harris RD Lifestyle activities of the elderly: composition and determinants. Disabil Rehabil 1995 ; 17: 639.
40. World Health Organization. International classfication of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2001.