Responsiveness of functional health status measures frequently used in stroke research

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 28, Issue 17, 2006, Pages 1035-1040

  Schepers, V P M ^a   Ketelaar, M ^a   Visser Meily, J M A ^a   Dekker, J ^b   Lindeman, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Functional health status; Measures; Responsiveness; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; FRENCHAY ACTIVITIES INDEX; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; STROKE ADAPTED SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE 30; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STROKE;

EID: 33748298757     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280500494694     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Terwee, C and Dekker, F and Wiersinga, W and Prummel, M and Bossuyt, P. (2003) On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation Qual Life Res, 12, pp. 349-362.
2. Van de Putten, J and Hobart, J and Freeman, J and Thompson, A. (1999) Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat, 66, pp. 480-484.
3. Hobart, J and Lamping, D and Freeman, J and Langdon, D and McLellan, D and Greenwood, R and Thompson, A. (2001) Evidence-based measurement: Which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology 57, pp. 639-644.
4. Hsueh, I and Lin, J and Jeng, J and Hsieh, C. (2002) Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure, 5-item Barthel index, and 10-item Barthel index in patients with stroke J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 73, pp. 188-190.
5. Wallace, D and Duncan, P and Lai, S. (2002) Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke: The impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness J Clin Epidemiol, 55, pp. 922-928.
6. De Haan, R and Aaronson, N and Limburg, M and Hewer, R and Crevel, Hv. (1993) Measuring quality of life in stroke Stroke, 24, pp. 320-327.
7. Chong, D. (1995) Measurement of instrumental activities of daily living in stroke Stroke, 26, pp. 1119-1122.
8. Buck, D and Jacoby, A and Massey, A and Ford, G. (2000) Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke Stroke, 31, pp. 2004-2010.
9. Holbrook, M and Skilbeck, C. (1983) An activities index for use with stroke patients Age Ageing, 12, pp. 166-170.
10. Wade, D and Legh-Smith, J and Langton Hewer, R. (1985) Social activities after stroke: Measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index Int Rehab Med, 7, pp. 176-181.
11. Schuling, J and Haan, R and Limburg, M and Groenier, K. (1993) The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients Stroke, 24, pp. 1173-1177.
12. Van de Port, I and Ketelaar, M and Schepers, V and van de Bos, G and Lindeman, E. (2004) Monitoring the functional health status of stroke patients: The value of the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30 Disab Rehab, 26, pp. 635-640.
13. Jorgensen, H and Nakayama, H and Raaschou, H and Larsen, K and Hubbe, P and Olsen, T. (1995) The effect of a stroke unit: Reductions in mortality, discharge rate to nursing home, length of hospital stay, and cost. A community-based study Stroke, 26, pp. 1178-1182.
14. Kalra, L. (1994) The influence of stroke unit rehabilitation on functional recovery from stroke Stroke, 25, pp. 821-825.
15. Dam, M and Tonin, P and Casson, S and Ermani, M and Pizzolato, G and Iaia, V and Battistin, L. (1993) The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients Stroke, 24, pp. 1186-1191.
16. Jorgensen, H and Nakayama, H and Raaschou, H and Vive-Larsen, J and Stoier, M and Olsen, T. (1995) Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen stroke study Arch Phys Med Rehab, 76, pp. 406-412.
17. Collin, C and Wade, D and Davies, S and Horne, V. (1988) The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study Int Disab Stud, 10, pp. 61-63.
18. Hamilton, B and Granger, C and Sherwin, F and Zielezny, M and Tashman, J.(1987) A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurement. (pp. 137-147). Baltimore MD: Paul H. Brookes Publ.
19. Van Straten, A and de Haan, R and Limburg, M and Schuling, J and Bossuyt, P and van de Bos, G. (1997) A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30) Stroke, 28, pp. 2155-2161.
20. Kazis, L and Anderson, J and Meenan, R. (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status Med Care, 27, pp. S178-S189.
21. Cohen, J.(1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. In. New York: Academic Press.
22. Wyller, T and Sveen, U and Bautz-Holter, E. (1996) The Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients: Agreement between scores by patients and by relatives Disab Rehab, 18, pp. 454-459.
23. Segal, M and Schall, R. (1994) Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors Stroke, 25, pp. 2391-2397.
24. Tooth, L and McKenna, K and Smith, M and O'Rourke, P. (2003) Further evidence for the agreement between patients with stroke and their proxies on the Frenchay Activities Index Clin Rehab, 17, pp. 656-665.
25. Sneeuw, K and Aaronson, N and de Haan, R and Limburg, M. (1997) Assessing quality of life after stroke. The value and limitations of proxy ratings Stroke, 28, pp. 1541-1549.