Potential genetic bases of morphological evolution in the triassic fish Saurichthys

Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution

Volumn 314 B, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 519-526

  Schmid, Leonhard ^a   Sánchez Villagra, Marcelo R ^a  

^a PALÄONTOLOGISCHES INSTITUT UND MUSEUM   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FOSSIL; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PALEONTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FOSSILS; GENE DUPLICATION; PALEONTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; ZEBRAFISH;

ACIPENSERIDAE; DANIO RERIO; ORYZIAS; ORYZIINAE; SAURICHTHYS; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 79251484684     PISSN: 15525007     EISSN: 15525015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21372     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Begle DP. 1992. Monophyly and relationships of the argentinoid fishes. Copeia 2:350-366.
2. Bell MA. 2009. Implications of a fossil stickleback assemblage for Darwinian gradualism. J Fish Biol 75:1977-1999.
3. Bell MA, Travis MP, Blouw DM. 2006. Inferring natural selection in a fossil threespine stickleback. Paleobiology 32:562-577.
4. Benton MJ. 2010. Studying function and behavior in the fossil record. PLoS Biol 8:e1000321.
5. Bogutskaya N, Zupancic P. 2003. Phoxinellus pseudalepidotus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), a new species from the Neretva basin with an overview of the morphology of Phoxinellus species of Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. Ichthyol Explor Freshwater 14:369-383.
6. Bürgin T. 1999. Middle Triassic marine fish faunas from Switzerland. In: Arratia GH, Schultze HP, editors. Mesozoic fishes 2-systematics and fossil record. München: Pfeil. p 481-494.
7. Carroll SB. 2005. Evolution at two levels: on genes and form. PLoS Biol 3:e245.
8. Carroll SB. 2008. Evo Devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134:25-36.
9. Chan YF, Marks ME, Jones FC, Villarreal Jr G, Shapiro MD, Brady SD, Southwick AM, Absher DM, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Myers RM, Petrov D, Jónsson B, Schluter D, Bell MA, Kingsley DM. 2010. Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 327:302-305.
10. Colosimo PF, Hosemann KE, Balabhadra S. 2005. Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of ectodysplasin alleles. Science 307:1928-1933.
11. De Robertis EM. 2008. Evo Devo: variations on ancestral themes. Cell 132:185-195.
12. Fraser GJ, Hulsey CD, Bloomquist RF, Uyesugi K, Manley NR, Streelman JT. 2009. An ancient gene network is co-opted for teeth on old and new jaws. PLoS Biol 7:e31.
13. Gardiner BG, Schaeffer B, Masserie JA. 2005. A review of lower actinopterygian phylogeny. Zool J Linn Soc 14:511-525.
14. Gerhart J, Kirschner M. 2007. The theory of facilitated variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8582-8589.
15. Gompel N, Prud'homme B. 2009. The causes of repeated genetic evolution. Dev Biol 332:36-47.
16. Gould JS, Eldredge N. 1993. Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366:223-227.
17. Grande L, Hilton EJ. 2006. An exquisitely preserved skeleton representing a primitive sturgeon from the upper Cretaceous Judith river formation of Montana. J Paleontol 80:1-39.
18. Harris MP, Rohner N, Schwarz H, Perathoner S, Konstantinidis P, Nüsslein-Volhard C. 2008. Zebrafish eda and edar mutants reveal conserved and ancestral roles of ectodysplasin signaling in vertebrates. PLoS Genet 4:e1000206.
19. Hoekstra HE, Coyne JA. 2007. The locus of evolution: Evo Devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61:995-1016.
20. Johanson Z, Kearsley A, den Blaauwen J, Newman M, Smith MM. 2010. No bones about it: an enigmatic Devonian fossil reveals a new skeletal framework-a potential role of loss of gene regulation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21:414-423.
21. Kemp TS. 2007. The concept of correlated progression as the basis of a model for the evolutionary origin of major new taxa. Proc Roy Soc B 274:1667-1673.
22. Kingsley DM, Peichel CL. 2007. The molecular genetics of evolutionary change in sticklebacks. In: Östlund-Nilsson S, Mayer I, Huntingford FA, editors. Biology of the three-spined stickleback. Boca Raton: CRC Press. p 41-81.
23. Kondo S, Kuwahara Y, Kondo M, Naruse K, Mitani H, Wakamatsu Y, Ozato K Asakawa S, Shimizu N, Shima A. 2001. The medaka rs-3 locus required for scale development encodes ectodysplasin-A receptor. Curr Biol 11:1202-1206.
24. Kuraku S, Meyer A. 2009. The evolution and maintenance of Hox gene clusters in vertebrates and the teleost-specific genome duplication. Int J Dev Biol 53:765-773.
25. Liem KF, Bemis WE, Walker Jr WF, Grande L. 2001. Functional anatomy of the vertebrates, 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Harcourt.
26. Ludwig A, Belfiore NM, Pitra C, Svirsky V, Jenneckens I. 2001. Genome duplication events and functional reduction of ploidy levels in sturgeon (Acipenser, Huso and Scaphirhynchus). Genetics 158:1203-1215.
27. Lynch VJ, Wagner GP. 2008. Resurrecting the role of transcription factor change in developmental evolution. Evolution 62:2131-2154.
28. Mabee PM, Arratia G, Coburn M, Haendel M, Hilton EJ, Lundberg JG, Mayden RL, Rios N, Westerfield M. 2007. Connecting evolutionary morphology to genomics using ontologies: a case study from Cypriniformes including zebrafish. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 308:655-668.
29. Maderspacher F. 2009. Evolution: mirror, mirror in the pond. Curr Biol 19:R902-R904.
30. McGregor AP, Orgogozo V, Delon I, Zanet J, Srinivasan DG, Payre F, Stern DL. 2007. Morphological evolution through multiple cis-regulatory mutations at a single gene. Nature 448:587-590.
31. Mikkola ML. 2008. TNF superfamily in skin appendage development. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 19:219-230.
32. Müller J, Scheyer TM, Head JJ, Barrett P, Werneburg I, Ericson PGP, Pol D, Sánchez-Villagra MR. 2010. Homeotic effects, somitogenesis and the evolution of vertebral numbers in recent and fossil amniotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:2118-2123.
33. Mutter RJ, Herzog A. 2004. A new genus of Triassic actinopterygian with an evaluation of deepened flank scales in fusiform fossil fishes. J Vert Paleont 24:794-801.
34. Mutter RJ, Cartanyà J, Basaraba AU. 2008. New evidence of Saurichthys from the lower Triassic with an evaluation of early saurichthyid diversity. In: Arratia G, Schultze HP, Wilson VH, editors. Mesozoic fishes 4. München: Pfeil. p 103-127.
35. Nelson JS. 2006. Fishes of the World, 4th edition. New York: Wiley.
36. Orr HA. 2005. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat Rev Genet 6:119-127.
37. Pantalacci S, Chaumot A, Benoît G, Sadier A, Delsuc F, Douzery EJ, Laudet V. 2008. Conserved features and evolutionary shifts of the EDA signaling pathway involved in vertebrate skin appendage development. Mol Biol Evol 25:912-928.
38. Peterson KJ, Summons RS, Donoghue PCJ. 2007. Molecular Palaeobiology. Palaeontology 50:775-809.
39. Prud'homme B, Gompel N, Carroll SB. 2007. Emerging principles of regulatory evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8605-8612.
40. Raff RA. 2007. Written in stone: fossils, genes and evo-devo. Nat Rev Genet 8:911-920.
41. Rebeiz M, Pool JE, Kassner VA, Aquadro CF, Carroll SB. 2009. Stepwise modification of a modular enhancer underlies adaptation in a Drosophila population. Science 326:1663-1667.
42. Rieppel O. 1985. Die Triasfauna der Tessiner Kalkalpen XXV. Die Gattung Saurichthys (Pisces, Actinopterygii) aus der mittleren Trias des Monte San Giorgio, Kanton Tessin. Schweiz Paläontolog Abh 108:1-103.
43. Rieppel O. 1992. A new species of the genus Saurichthys (Pisces: Actinopterygii) from the middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio (Switzerland), with comments on the phylogenetic interrelationships of the genus. Palaeontographica Abt A 221:63-94.
44. Rohner N, Harris M, Bercsényi M, Orban L, Nüsslein-Volhard C. 2008. Fibroblast growth factor signaling in skeletal evolution. Dev Biol 319:499.
45. Rohner N, Bercsényi M, Orbán L, Kolanczyk ME, Linke D, Brand M, Nüsslein-Volhard C, Harris MP. 2009. Duplication of fgfr1 permits Fgf signaling to serve as a target for selection during domestication. Curr Biol 19:1642-1647.
46. Sánchez-Villagra MR. 2010. Developmental palaeontology in synapsids: the rock record of ontogeny in mammals and their closest relatives. Proc Roy Soc B 277:1139-1147.
47. Scotland RW. 2010. Deep Homology: a view from systematics. BioEssays 32:438-449.
48. Shubin NH, Dahn RD. 2004. Evolutionary biology: lost and found. Nature 428:703-704.
49. Shubin N, Tabin C, Carroll S. 2009. Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature 457:818-823.
50. Sidlauskas BL. 2008. Continuous and arrested morphological diversification in sister clades of characiform fishes: a phylomorphospace approach. Evolution 62:3135-3156.
51. Sire J, Donoghue PCJ, Vickaryous MK. 2009. Origin and evolution of the integumentary skeleton in non-tetrapod vertebrates. J Anat 214:409-440.
52. Stern DL, Orgogozo V. 2009. Is genetic evolution predictable? Science 323:746-751.
53. Streelman JT, Peichel CL, Parichy DM. 2007. Developmental genetics of adaptation in fishes: the case for novelty. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 38:655-681.
54. Wildekamp RH, Kücük F, Ünlüsayin M, Neer WV. 1999. Species and subspecies in the genus Aphanius Nardo 1897 (Pisces Cyprinodontidae) in Turkey. Tr J Zool 23:23-44.
55. Witmer LM. 1995. The extant phylogenetic bracket and the importance of reconstructing soft tissues in fossils. In: Thomason J, editor. Functional morphology in paleontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 19-33.
56. Wolpert L, Jessel T, Lawrence P, Meyerowitz E, Robertson E, Smith J. 2007. Principles of development, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University press.
57. Wood TE, Burke JM, Rieseberg LH. 2005. Parallel genotypic adaptation: when evolution repeats itself. Genetica 123:157-170.
58. Wray GA. 2007. The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat Rev Genet 8:206-216.
59. Wu F, Sun Y, Hao W, Jiang D, Xu G, Sun Z, Tintori A. 2009. New species of Saurichthys (Actinopterygii: Saurichthyidae) from middle Triassic (Anisian) of Yunnan province, China. Acta Geologica Sinica 83:440-450.