Toward open public administration scholarship

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Schweik, Charles M ^a   Mergel, Ines ^b   Sandfort, Jodi R ^c   Zhao, Zhirong J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251469397     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muq072     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Agranoff, R. 2008a. Collaborating for knowledge: learning from public management networks. In Big ideas in collaborative public management, ed. L. B. Bingham and R. O'Leary, 162-94. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
2. -. 2008b. Conductive public organizations in networks: Collaborative management and civic engagement. In Civic engagement in a network society. Information age publishing, ed. K. Yang and E. Bergrud, 85-108. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
3. Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2003. Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
4. Akshay, Java, Xiaodan Song, Tim Finin, and Belle Tseng. 2007. Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, 55-65. New York, NY: ACM.
5. Alavi, M., and R. B. Gallupe. 2003. Using information technology in learning: Case studies in business and management education programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2:139-53.
6. Ames, Morgan, and Mor Naaman. 2007. Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 971-80. New York, NY: ACM.
7. Anderson, C. 2006. Wisdom of crowds: Scientific publishers should let their online readers become reviewers. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature04992. http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate /nature04992.html (accessed June 12, 2009).
8. Bailey, M., and R. Mayer. 1992. Public management in an interconnected world: Essays in the Minnowbrook tradition. New York, NY: Greenwood.
9. Bainbridge, W. 2009. Personal conversation. September 19.
10. Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
11. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Science and Humanities. 2003. Declaration created at the Conference on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, in Berlin, Germany, October 20-22.
12. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. 2003. Statement created at Meeting on Open Access Publishing, April 11, Chevy Chase, MD. http://www.earlham.edu/;peters/fos/bethesda.htm (accessed February 14, 2009).
13. Bingham, L. B., J. R. Sandfort, and R. O'Leary. 2008. Learning to do and doing to learn: Teaching managers to collaborate in networks. In Big ideas in collaborative public management, ed. L. B. Bingham, R. O'Leary, 270-85. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
14. Boyd, D. M., and N. B. Ellison. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html (accessed June 12, 2009).
15. Boyle, J. 2003. The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66:33-74.
16. Bozeman, B., and S. Bretschneider. 1986. Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public Administration Review 46:475-87.
17. Bransford, J., A. Brown, and R. Cocking. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, ed. N. R. Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
18. Burnham, J. C. 1990. The evolution of editorial peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1323-9.
19. Busari, S. 2008. Tweeting the terror: How social media reacted to Mumbai. http://www.cnn.com/2008/ WORLD/asiapcf/11/27/mumbai.twitter/.
20. Bushouse, B. K., W. S. Jacobson, K. T. Lambright, J. J. Llorens, R. S. Morse, and O. Poocharoen. 2010. Crossing the divide: Building bridges between public administration practitioners and scholars. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (Supp. 1): i99-i112.
21. Danzinger, J., and R. Kling. 1982. Computers in the policy process. In Computers and politics, ed. J. Danzinger, W. Dutton, R. Kling, and K. Kraemer, 136-68. New York, NY: Columbia Univ. Press.
22. Esanu, J. M., and P. F. Uhlir. 2004. Open access and the public domain in digital data and information for science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
23. Fink, D. 2003. Creating significant learning experiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
24. Fountain, J. 2001. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
25. Gilbert, Eric, Karrie Karahalios, and Christian Sandvig. 2008. The network in the garden: An empirical analysis of social media in rural life. In CHI '08: Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ed. Mary Czerwinski, Arnie Lund, and Desney Tan, 1603-12. New York, NY: ACM.
26. Giles, Jim. 2005. Special Report Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438:900-901.
27. Ginsparg, P. 1996. Winners and losers in the global research village. Invited contribution for conference held at UNESCO headquarters, Paris, France, February 19-23. http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/ ;ginsparg/blurb/pg96unesco.html (accessed December 3, 2008).
28. Greaves, S., J. Scott, M. Clarke, L. Miller, T. Hannay, A. Thomas, and P. Campbell. 2006. Nature's peer review debate. http://www.nature.com/nature/ peerreview/debate/index.html (accessed June 12, 2009).
29. Hardy, Michael. 2008. From ELC: Congress access to MySpace could advance Web 2.0. Federal Computer Week, http://fcw.com/articles/2008/10/27/from-elc- congress-access-to-myspace-couldadvance- web-20.aspx (accessed February 20, 2009).
30. Harper, M. 2009. Uploading hope: An inside view of Obama's HQ new media video team. Presentation at the YouTube and the 2008 Election Cycle in the United States Conference, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. http://youtubeandthe2008election.jitp2.net/keygues/mharper (accessed June 20, 2009).
31. Hess, C. and E. Ostrom, eds. 2007. Understanding knowledge as a commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Huberman, Bernardo A., Daniel M. Romero, and Fang Wu. 2009. Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science 35:758-65. http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/ papers/crowd/crowd.pdf (accessed September 13, 2009).
33. Johns, A. 2001. The birth of scientific reading. Nature 409:287-289.
34. Knott, J. H. 1993. Comparing public and private management: Cooperative effort and principal-agent relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3:93-119.
35. Kondrat, M. E. 1992. Reclaiming the practical: Formal and substantive rationality in social work practice. Social Service Review 66:237-55.
36. Koontz, T., T. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. Korfmacher, C. Moseley, and C. Thomas. 2004. Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
37. Kronick, D. 1990. Peer review in 18th century scientific journalism. Journal of the American Medical Association 263:1321-22.
38. Lakhani, Karim, and Robert Wolf. 2005. Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. In Perspectives in free and open source software, ed. J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Layton, J. 2009. How digg works. Website publisher. http://computer. howstuffworks.com/digg.htm (accessed June 25, 2009).
40. Lee, Kathy. 2006. What goes around comes around. An analysis of del.icio.us as a social space. In CSCW 06: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ed. Pamela Hinds and David Martin, 191-4. New York, NY: ACM.
41. Mayer-Schönberger, V., and D. Lazer, ed. 2007. The governing of government information. In Governance and information technology: From electronic government to information government. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. McCook, A. 2006. Is peer review broken? The Scientist 20:26. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/ display/23061/ (accessed June 10, 2009).
43. Means, B., Y. Toyanman, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones. 2009. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
44. Middendorf, J., and D. Pace. 2004. Decoding the disciplines: A model for helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 98:1-12.
45. Miller, J. 2006. Foreword: Why open access to scholarship matters. Lewis & Clark Law Review 10:773-38.
46. Nature 2006. Nature's peer review debate. http://www.nature.com/nature/ peerreview/debate/ (accessed June 9, 2009).
47. Nov, Oded. 2007. What movtivates wikipedians? Communications of the ACM. 50:60-64.
48. Nov, O., M. Naaman, and C. Ye. 2009. Motivational, structural, and tenure factors that impact online community photo sharing. In Proceedings of the Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2009). http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/206/ 426 (accessed August 19, 2009).
49. O'Connell, D., J. F. McCarthy, and Hall D. 2004. Print, video, or the CEO: The impact of media in teaching leadership with the case method. Journal of Management Education 28:294-318.
50. Olsen, F. 2007. Intell's wiki pied piper. Federal Computer Week. http://fcw.com/articles/2007/12/13/ intells-wiki-pied-piper.aspx (accessed August 15, 2009).
51. O'Reilly, T. 2007. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies 65, 17-37.
52. - 2009. Gov2.0 Summit. http://www.gov2summit.com/ (accessed September 22, 2009).
53. Ostrom, V. 1986. A fallabilist's approach to norms and criteria of choice. In Guidance, control, and evaluation in the public sector, ed. F. X. Kaufmann, G. Majone, and V. Ostrom, 229-44. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
54. Provan, K., and P. Kenis. 2008. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18:229-52.
55. Rheingold, H. 1993. The rirtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Rosenbloom, D. H. 1995. The use of case studies in public administrative education in the USA. Journal of Management History 1:33.
57. Sandewall, E. 2006. Systems: Opening up the process: A hybrid system of peer review. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature04994. http://www.nature.com/nature/ peerreview/debate/index.html (accessed June 3, 2009).
58. Sandfort, J. R. and H. B. Milward. 2008. Collaborative service provision in the public sector. In Handbook of inter-organizational relations, ed. S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, and P. S. Ring. Oxford: Oxford Unive. Press.
59. Schon, D. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60. Schroer, Joachim, and Guido Hertel. 2009. Voluntary engagement in an open web-based Encyclopedia: Wikipedians, and why they do it. Media Psychology 12:1-25.
61. Schweik, C., T. Evans, and J. Grove. 2005. Open source and open content: a framework for global collaboration in social-ecological research. Ecology and Society 10:33. http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art33/ (accessed August 18, 2009).
62. SecondLife. 2009. http://secondlife.com (accessed September 22, 2009).
63. Shortliffe, E., and P. Uhlir. 2004. Electronic scientific, technical, and medical journal publishing and its implications: Report of a symposium. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
64. Sica, G., ed. 2006. Open access: Open problems. Milan, Italy: Polimetrica.
65. Spier, R. 2002. The history of the peer-review process. Trends in Biotechnology 20:357-358.
66. Shulman, L. S. 2005. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus 134:52-60.
67. US Department of Defense. 2009. DoD social media user agreement. http://www.ourmilitary.mil/ user-agreement.shtml (accessed September 21, 2009).
68. Van de Ven, A. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
69. Vance, A. 2009. Data analysts captivated by R's power. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/ 01/07/technology/business-computing/07program.html. January 6.
70. Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Warner, J., and S. Chun. 2008. A citizen privacy protection model for e-government mashup services Paper presented at the International Conference on Digital Government Research, Los Angeles, CA, May 21-24.
72. Wesch, M. 2007. The machine is using us. YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v5NLlGopyXT-g (accessed January 20, 2009).
73. Wiki.org. 2002. What is a wiki. http://www.wiki.org/wiki.cgi?WhatIsWiki (accessed June 11, 2009).
74. Young, J. R. 2009. How not to lose face on facebook, for professors. Chronicle of Higher Education, February 6. http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i22/ 22a00104.htm (accessed June 12, 2009).
75. Zhao, D., and M. B. Rosson. 2009. How and why people twitter: The role that microblogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, ed. S. Teasley, E. Havn, W. Prinz, and W. Lutters, 243-52. Sanibel Island, FL: ACM.
76. Ziman, J. 1969. Information, communication, knowledge. Nature 224:318-324.