Open source and open content: A framework for global collaboration in social-ecological research

Ecology and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2005, Pages

  Schweik, Charles ^a   Evans, Tom ^b   Grove, J Morgan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Northeastern Research Station   (United States)

Author keywords

Free libre software; Land cover; Land use; Modeling; Open content; Open source software

Indexed keywords

LAND COVER; LAND USE; MODELING; SOFTWARE;

EID: 27444435496     PISSN: 17083087     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-01287-100133     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Aber, J. D. 1997. Why don't we believe the models? Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 78 (3):232-233.
2. Agarwal, C., G. M. Green, J. M. Grove, T. Evans, and C. M. Schweik. 2002. A review and assessment of land-use change models: dynamics of space, time, and human choice. CIPEC Collaborative Report Number 1. USFS Publication NE-GTR-297. Joint publication of the Center for the Study of Institutions, Population and Environmental Change at Indiana University-Bloomington and the U.S. Forest Service. Burlington, Vermont, USA. [Online] URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/newtownsquare/publications/technicalreports/ pdfs/2002/gtrne297.pdf
3. Asklund, U. and Bendix, L. 2002. A study of configuration management in open source software projects." IEE Proceedings of Software Engineering 149(1):40-46.
4. Benkler, Y. 2002. Coase's penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal 112 (3):371-446.
5. Berghel, H. 2001. Digital village: a cyberpublishing manifesto. Communications of the ACM 44 (3):17-20.
6. Bezroukov, N. 1999a. Open source software as a special type of academic research (a critique of vulgar Raymondism). First Monday 4(10). [Online] URL: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue410/bezroukov/
7. Bezroukov, N. 1999b. A second look at the cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday 4(12). [Online] URL: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue412/bezroukov/
8. Bollier, D. 1999. The power of openness: why citizens, education, government and business should care about the coming revolution in open source code software. [Online] URL: http://h2oproject.law.harvard.edu/opencode/h2o/.
9. Bonaccorsi, A., and C. Rossi. 2003. Why open source software can succeed. Research Policy Special Issue on Open Source Software Development. [Online] URL: http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/rp-bonaccorsirossi.pdf.
10. Boyle, J. 2003a. The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66(1/2):33-75.
11. Boyle, J., editor. 2003b. The public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66(1/2):1-483.
12. Burnham, J. C. 1990. The evolution of editorial peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association 263(10):1323-1329.
13. Capiluppi, A., P. Lago, and M. Morisio. 2003. Evidences in the evolution of open source projects through changelog analyses. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani, editors. Taking stock of the bazaar: proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. [Online] URL:http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003.
14. Creative Commons. 2004. Choose license. Creative Commons, San Francisco, California, USA. [Online] URL: http://creativecommons.org/license/.
15. Crowston, K., H. Annabi, and J. Howison. 2003. Defining open source project success.Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2003). (Seattle 2003). [online] URL: http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/crowstonannabihowison.dpf.
16. Crowston, K., H. Annabi, J. Howison, and C. Masango. 2004. Towards a portfolio of FLOSS project success measures. [Online] URL: http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/crowston04towards.pdf.
17. Dempsey, B., D. Weiss, P. Jones, and J. Greenberg. 2002. Who is an open source developer? CACM 45:67-72.
18. Dietz, T., E. Ostrom, and P. C. Stern. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907-1912.
19. Divitini, M., L. Jaccheri, E. Monteiro, and H. Traetteberg. 2003. Open source processes: no place for politics? In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani, editors. Taking stock of the bazaar: proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. [Online] URL: http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003.
20. Drucker, P. F. 1999. Beyond the information revolution. Atlantic Monthly. [Online] URL: http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/99oct/9910drucker.htm.
21. Dube, L., and G. Pare. 2001. Global virtual teams. Communication of the ACM 44(12):71-73.
22. Dutton, W. H., and K. L. Kraemer. 1985. Modeling as negotiating: the political dynamics of computer models in the policy process. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, USA.
23. EPA. 2000. Projecting land-use change: a summary of models for assessing the effects of community growth and change on land-use patterns. EPA/600/R-00/098. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
24. Esanu, J. M., and P. F. Uhlir. 2004. Open access and the public domain in digital data and information for science; proceedings of an international symposium. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
25. Feller, J., and B. Fitzgerald. 2002. Understanding open source software development. Addison-Wesley, London, UK.
26. Fielding, R. Y. 1999. Shared leadership in the Apache project. Communications of the ACM 42 (4):42-43.
27. Fogel, K. 1999. Open source development with CVS. Coriolis, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
28. Geist, H. J., and E. F. Lambin. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52(2):143-150.
29. Glass, R. 1999. Of open source, Linux and hype. IEE Software 16(1):45-51.
30. Ghosh, R. A. 2003. Cooking pot markets: an economic model for the trade of free goods and services on the Internet. First Monday 3(3). [Online] URL: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue33/ghosh/
31. Ghosh, R. A., and V. V. Prakash. 2000. The orbiten free software survey. First Monday 5(7). [Online] URL: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue57/ghosh/.
32. Ghosh, R. A., G. Robles, and R. Glott. 2002. Free/libre and open source software: survey and study. Technical report. International Institute of Infonomics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. [Online] URL:http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/report/ index.htm.
33. Grove, J. M., C. M. Schweik, T. P. Evans, and G. M. Green. 2002. Modeling human-environmental dynamics. Pages 160-188 in K. C. Clarke, B. E. Parks, and M. P. Crane, editors. Geographic information systems and environmental modeling. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
34. Hahn, R. W., editor. 2002. Government policy toward open source software. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
35. Halloran, T. J., W. L. Scherlis, and J. R. Erenkrantz. 2003. Beyond code: content management and the open source development portal. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani, editors. Taking stock of the bazaar: proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. [Online] URL: http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003.
36. Hann, I., J. Roberts, S. Slaughter, and R. Fielding. 2002. Why do developers contribute to open source projects? First evidence of economic incentives. [Online] URL: http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2002/HannRobertsSlaughterFielding.pdf.
37. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1248.
38. Healy, K., and A. Schussman. 2003. The ecology of open-source software development. [Online] URL: http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/healyschussman.pdf
39. Hertel, G., S. Niedner, and S. Herrman. 2003. Motivation of software developers in open source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani, editors. Taking stock of the bazaar: proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. [Online] URL: http:opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003.
40. Hildebrand, J. D. 2004. Hidden agendas in Linux land. Software Development Times. [Online] URL:http://www.sdtimes.com/cols/opensourcewatch015.htm.
41. Johns, A. 2001. The birth of scientific reading. Nature 409:287-289.
42. Johnson, J. P. 2002. Economics of open source software. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 11(4):637-662.
43. Jorgensen, N. 2001. Putting it all in the trunk: incremental software development in the FreeBSD open-sburce project. Information Systems Journal 11(4):321-336.
44. Kelly, S., and M. Jones. 2001. Groupware and the social infrastructure of communication. Communications of the ACM 44(12):77-79.
45. King, J. L., and K. L. Kraemer. 1993. Models, facts, and the policy process: the political ecology of estimated truth. Pages 353-360 in M. F. Goodchild, B. O. Parks, and L. T. Steyaert, editors. Environmental modeling with GIS. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
46. Krishnamurthy, S. 2002. Cave or community? An empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects. First Monday 7(6). [online] URL: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue76/krishnamurthy/.
47. Kronick, D. 1990. Peer review in 18th century scientific journalism. Journal of the American Medical Association 263(10):1321-1322.
48. Lakhani, K. R., B. Wolf, J. Bates, and C. DiBona. 2002. The Boston Consulting Group Hacker Survey, Release 0.73. [Online] URL: http://www.ostg.com/bcg/bcg-0.73/BCGHackerSurveyv0-73.html.
49. Lambin, E. F., H. J. Geist, and E. Lepers. 2003. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 28:205-241.
50. Lee, S., N. Moisa, and M. Weiss. 2003. Open source as a signaling device: an economic analysis. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani, editors. Taking stock of the bazaar: proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. [Online] URL: http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003.
51. Lerner, J., and J. Tirole. 2002. The scope of open source licensing. [Online] URL: http://opensource.mit.edu/onlinepapers.php.
52. Lougee, W. P. 2004. Scholarly communication and libraries unbound: the opportunity of the commons. Paper presented at the Workshop on Scholarly Communication as a Commons, March 31, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. [online] URL: http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/archive/00001250/00/ CommonsworkshopLougeerevMar29b.pdf.
53. Markus, M. L., B. Manville, and C. E. Agres. 2000. What makes a virtual organization work? Sloan Management Review 42(1):13-26.
54. Mockus, A., R. Fielding, and J. Herbsleb. 2000. A case study of open source software development: the Apache server. Pages 263-272in Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference of Software Engineering. (Limerick 2000). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA.
55. Moody, G. 2001. Rebel code: Linux and the open source revolution. Perseus, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
56. Nakakoji, K., Y. Yamamoto, Y. Nishinaka, K. Kishida, and Y. Ye. 2002. Evolution patterns of open-source software systems and communities. Pages 76-85 in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA.
57. Noth, M., A. Borning, and P. Waddell. 2003. An extensible, modular architecture for simulating urban development, transportation, and environmental impacts. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 27(2):181-203.
58. O'Reilly, T. 1999. Lessons from open-source software development. Communications of the ACM. 42(4):33-37.
59. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
60. Ostrom, V., and E. Ostrom. 1977. Public goods and public choices. Pages 7-49 in E. S. Savas, editor. Alternatives for delivering public services: toward improved performance. Westview, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
61. Parker, P., R. Letcher, and A. Jakeman. 2002. Progress in integrated assessment and modeling. Environmental Modelling and Software 17:209-217.
62. Pavlicek, R.C. 2000. Embracing insanity: open source software development. SAMS, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
63. Perens, B. 1999. The open source definition. Pages 171-188 in C. DiBona, S. Ockman, and M. Stone, editors. Open sources: voices from the open source revolution. O'Reilly, Sebastopol, California, USA.
64. Pontius Jr., R. G., D. Huffaker, and K. Denman. 2004. Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Ecological Modelling 179(4):445-461.
65. Raymond, E. S. 1998. The cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday 3(3). [Online] URL: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue33/ raymond/index.html.
66. Schweik, C. M. 2005. An institutional analysis approach to studying libre software "commons." Upgrade 6(3), in press. [Online] URL: http://www.upgrade-cepis.org/pages/pastissues.html#2005
67. Schweik, C. M., and J. M. Grove. 2000. Fostering open-source research via a World Wide Web system. Public Administration and Management 5 (3). [Online] URL: http://www.pamij.com/54/ 542opensource.html.
68. Schweik, C. M., T. Evans, and J. M. Grove. 2003. Initiating an open source/content landcover change modeling effort; report of a workshop held on August 22-23, 2003. [Online] URL: http://www.lulc.org/bcworkshop2003/oslulcworkshopreport2003.pdf.
69. Schweik, C. M., and A. Semenov. 2003. The institutional design of 'open source' programming: implications for addressing complex public policy and management problems. First Monday 8(1). [Online] URL: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue81/schweik/
70. Shaikh, M., and T. Cornford. 2003. Version management tools: CVS to BK in the Linux kernel. In Feller, J., B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani, editors. Taking stock of the bazaar: proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. [Online] URL: http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003.
71. Sharma, S., V. Sugmaran, and B. Rajgopalan. 2002. A framework for creating hybrid-open source software communities. Information Systems Journal 12(1):7-25.
72. Shortliffe, E. H. 2004, Electronic scientific, technical and medical journal publishing and its implications: report of a symposium. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
73. Smith, M., M. Barton, M. Bass, M. Branschofsky, G. McClellan, D. Stuve, R. Tansley, and J. Harford Walker. 2003. DSpace: an open source dynamic digital repository. D-Lib Magazine. 9(1). [Online] URL: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january03/smith/01smith.html.
74. SQW Ltd. 2004. Costs and business models in scientific research publishing. (Online] URL: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/assets/wtd003184.pdf
75. Stallman, R. M. 1999. The GNU operating system and the free software movement. Pages 53-70 in C. DiBona, S. Ockman, and M. Stone, editors. Open sources: voices from the open source revolution. O'Reilly, Sebastopol, California, USA.
76. Stallman, R. M. 2001. The free universal encyclopedia and learning resource. Pages 257-269 in C. Werry and M. Mobray, editors. Online communities: commerce, community action, and the virtual university. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
77. Stallman, R. M. 2001. Free software, free society: selected essays of Richard M. Stallman. Free Software Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
78. Stewart, K. 2004. OSS project success: from internal dynamics to external impact. Pages 92-96 in Proceedings of the 4th Annual Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. (Edinburgh 2004). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA.
79. Suber, P. 2004. Creating an intellectual commons through open access. [Online] URL: http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/archive/00001246/.
80. Stix, G. 2003. Some rights reserved. Scientific American(March). [Online] URL: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/news/story.php?storyid=577
81. Tuomi, I. 2004. Evolution of the Linux credits file: methodological challenges and reference data for open source research. First Monday 9(6). [Online] URL: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/ issue96/tuomi/index.html.
82. Voightmann, M. P., and C. P. Coleman. 2003. Open source methodologies and mission critical software development. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani, editors. Taking stock of the bazaar: proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. [Online] URL: http://opensource.ucc.i/icse2003.
83. Waddell, P. 1998. An urban simulation model for integrated policy analysis and planning: residential location and housing market components of urbanism. [Online] URL: http://www.urbansim.org.
84. Waddell, P. 2002. UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 68(3):297-314.
85. Waddell, P., and G. F. Ulfarsson. 2005. Introduction to urban simulation: design and development of operational models. [Online] URL: URL:http://www.urbansim.org.
86. Warsta, J., and P. Abrahamsson. 2003. Is open source development essentially an agile method?" Pages 143-147 in J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani, editors. Taking stock of the bazaar: proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. [Online] URL: http://opensource.ucc.ie/icse2003/3rd-WS-on-OSS-Engineering.pdf.
87. Webb, C. L. 2004. IBM's open source lovefest. Monday, September 13. The Washington Post (September 13, 2004). [Online] URL: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/ A17842-2004Sep13.html?nav=rsstechnology.
88. Weber, S. 2004. The success of open source. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
89. Wichmann, T. 2002. FLOSS final report. Part 2. Firm's open source activities: motivations and policy implications. Berlecon Research, Berlin, Germany. [Online] URL: http://www.berlecon.de/studien/downloads/200207-FLOSS Activities.pdf.
90. Ziman, J. 1969. Information, communication, knowledge. Nature 224:318-324.