Are education cost functions ready for prime time? An examination of their validity and reliability

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 28-57

  Duncombe, William ^a   Yinger, John ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78951489439     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0161956X.2011.539954     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Alexander, C. D., Gronberg, T. J., Jansen, D. W., Keller, H., Taylor, L. L., & Treisman, P. U. (2000). A study of uncontrollable variations in the costs of Texas public education (Summary report prepared for the 77th Texas Legislature). Austin: Charles A. Dana Center, The University of Texas at Austin.
2. Armstrong, J. S. (1985). Long-range forecasting: From crystal ball to computer. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
3. Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Standards and practices for forecasting. In J. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting: Handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 679-732). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
4. Armstrong, J. S. (2005). Forecasting principles and methods. Foresight, 1, 29-35.
5. Armstrong, J. S. (2006). Findings from evidence-based forecasting: Methods for reducing forecast error. Unpublished paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
6. Barrow, L., & Rouse, C. (2005). Causality, causality, causality: The view of education inputs and outputs from economics (Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper, WP 2005-15). Chicago, IL: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
7. Baum, C., Schaffer, M., & Stillman, S. (2007). Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/GMM estimation and testing. Stata Journal, 7, 465-506.
8. Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 443-450.
9. Bretschneider, S. (1985). Forecasting: Some new realities (Occasional Paper No. 99). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Metropolitan Studies Program.
10. Bretschneider, S., Gorr, W., Grizzle, G., & Klay, E. (1989). Political and organizational influences on the accuracy of forecasting state government revenue. International Journal of Forecasting, 5, 307-319.
11. Chatfield, C. (1996). Model uncertainty and forecast accuracy. Journal of Forecasting, 15, 495-508.
12. Collopy, F., & Armstrong, J.S. (2000). Another error measure for selection of the best forecasting method: The unbiased absolute percentage error. Unpublished paper. Available from http://www.forecastingprinciples.com/paperpdf/armstrong-unbiasedAPE.pdf
13. Costrell, R., Hanushek, E., & Loeb, S. (2008). What do cost functions tell us about the cost of an adequate education? Peabody Journal of Education, 83, 198-223.
14. Deschamps, E. (2004). The impact of institutional change on forecast accuracy: A case study of budget forecasting in Washington State. International Journal of Forecasting, 20, 647-657.
15. Downes, T., & Pogue, T. (1994). Adjusting school aid formulas for the higher cost of educating disadvantaged students. National Tax Journal, 67, 89-110.
16. Duncombe, W. (2006). Responding to the charge of alchemy: Strategies for evaluating the reliability and validity of costing-out research. Journal of Education Finance, 32, 137-169.
17. Duncombe, W. (2007, January). Estimating the cost of meeting student performance standards in the St. Louis public schools. Report prepared for the Board of Education for the City of St. Louis. Available from http://cpr.maxwell.syr.edu/efap/CostingOut/Duncombetechnical%20report4.pdf
18. Duncombe, W., Lukemeyer, A., & Yinger, J. (2008). Dollars without sense: The mismatch between the No Child Left Behind Act accountability system and Title I funding. In R. D. Kahlenberg (Ed.), Improving on No Child Left Behind: Getting education reform back on track (pp. 19-102). New York, NY: The Century Foundation.
19. Duncombe, W., Miner, J., & Ruggiero, J. (1997). Empirical evaluation of bureaucratic models of inefficiency. Public Choice, 93, 1-18.
20. Duncombe, W., Ruggiero, J., & Yinger, J. (1996). Alternative approaches to measuring the cost of education. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 327-356). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
21. Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (1993). An analysis of returns to scale in public production, with an application to fire protection. Journal of Public Economics, 52, 49-72.
22. Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2000). Financing higher student performance standards: The case of New York State. Economics of Education Review, 19, 363-386.
23. Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2005a). Estimating the Costs of meeting student performance outcomes adopted by the Kansas State Board of Education (Report prepared for The Kansas Legislative Division of Post Audit). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
24. Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2005b). How much does a disadvantaged student cost? Economics of Education Review, 24, 513-532.
25. Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2007a). Does school district consolidation cut costs? Education Finance and Policy, 2, 341-375.
26. Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2007b). Measurement of cost differentials. In E. Fiske & H. F. Ladd (Eds.), Handbook of education finance and policy (pp. 238-256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Eom, T. H., Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2007, January). The unintended consequences of property tax relief: New York's STAR program (Center for Policy Research Working Paper). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
28. Ferguson, R. F., & Ladd, H. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama Schools. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 265-298). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
29. Gronberg, T., Jansen, W., Taylor, L. L., & Booker, K. (2004). School outcomes and school costs: The cost function approach. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Available from http://www.schoolfunding.info/states/tx/march4%20cost%20study.pdf
30. Hanushek, E. (2005, October). The alchemy of 'costing out' and adequate education. Paper presented at the Adequate Lawsuits: Their Growing Impact on American Education conference, Cambridge, MA.
31. Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1994). Succeeding generations: On the effects of investments in children. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
32. Henderson, J., & Quandt, R. (1980). Microeconomic theory: A mathematical approach (3rd edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
33. Imazeki, J. (2001). Grade-dependent costs of education: Evidence from Illinois (Draft paper). San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.
34. Imazeki, J. (2008). Assessing the costs of adequacy in California public schools: A cost function approach. Education Finance and Policy, 3, 90-108.
35. Imazeki, J., & Rechovsky, A. (2004a). Estimating the costs of meeting the Texas Educational Accountability Standards (Report for Texas Joint Select Committee on Public School Finance). Available from http://www.investintexasschools.org/schoolfinancelibrary/studies/files/2005/january/reschovskycoststudy.doc
36. Imazeki, J., & Reschovsky, A. (2004b). Is No Child Left Behind an un (or under) funded federal mandate? Evidence from Texas. National Tax Journal, 57, 571-588.
37. Imazeki, J., & Reschovsky, A. (2004c). School finance reform in Texas: A never ending story. In J. Yinger (Ed.), Helping children left behind: State aid and the pursuit of educational equity (pp. 251-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Imazeki, J., & Reschovsky, A. (2006). Does No Child Left Behind place a fiscal burden on states? Evidence from Texas. Education Finance and Policy, 1, 227-246.
39. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2002). The promise and pitfalls of using imprecise school accountability measures. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1, 91-114.
40. Kuo, Y., & Liang, K. (2004). Human judgments in New York State sales and use forecasting. Journal of Forecasting, 23, 297-314.
41. Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs. x-efficiency. American Economic Review, 56, 392-415.
42. Loeb, S. (2007, August). Difficulties of estimating the cost of achieving education standards (Working Paper 23). Seattle: Center on Reinventing Public Education, Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington.
43. Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S., & McGee, V. (1983). Forecasting: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
44. McCarty, T. A., & Yaisawarng, S. (1993). Technical efficiency in New Jersey school districts. In H. O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications (pp. 271-287). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45. Mocan, H. N., & Azad, S. (1995). Accuracy and rationality of state general fund revenue forecasts: Evidence from panel data. International Journal of Forecasting, 11, 417-427.
46. Murray, M. (2006). Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 111-132.
47. Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
48. Ondrich, J., & Ruggiero, J. (2001). Efficiency measurement in the Stochastic Frontier model. European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 432-442.
49. Ray, S. C. (1991). Resource use in public schools: A study of Connecticut. Management Science, 37, 1520-1628.
50. Reschovsky, A., & Imazeki, J. (2001).Achieving education adequacy through school finance reform. Journal of Education Finance, 26, 373-396.
51. Ruggiero, J. (1998). Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 461-468.
52. Ruggiero, J. (2001).Determining the base cost of education: An analysis ofOhio school districts. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19, 268-279.
53. Schaffer, M. (2005). XTIVREG2: Stata module to perform extended IV/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML and k-class regression for panel data models (Statistical Software Components S456501). Boston, MA: Boston College Department of Economics.
54. Shkurti, W. (1990). A user's guide to state revenue forecasting. Public Budgeting & Finance, 10, 79-94.
55. Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear iv regression. In D.W. K. Andrews & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg (pp. 80-108). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56. Tashman, L. (2000). Out-of-sample tests of forecasting accuracy: An analysis and review. International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 437-450.
57. Trochim, W. (2001). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.
58. Voorhees, W. R. (2004). More is better: Consensual forecasting and state revenue forecast error. International Journal of Public Administration, 27, 651-671.
59. Wang, W., Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2010). School district responses to matching aid programs for capital facilities: A case study of New York's building aid program. Unpublished paper, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
60. Wyckoff, P. (1990). The simple analytics of slack-maximizing bureaucracy. Public Choice, 67, 35-67.