Patient perceived outcomes after primary hip arthroplasty: Does gender matter?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 469, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 348-354

  Lavernia, Carlos J ^a,b   Alcerro, Jose C ^b   Contreras, Juan S ^b   Rossi, Mark D ^c  

^a Mercy Hospital Miami   (United States)

^b Arthritis Surgery and Research Foundation   (United States)

^c FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP PAIN; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF WELL BEING; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF EVALUATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WELLBEING; WOMAC;

EID: 78951477260     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1503-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. R Arocho CA McMillan P Sutton-Wallace 1998 Construct validation of the USA-Spanish version of the SF-36 health survey in a Cuban-American population with benign prostatic hyperplasia Qual Life Res 7 121 126 1:STN:280: DyaK1c7osVSqtg%3D%3D 10.1023/A:1008801308886 9523493
2. JA Baron J Barrett JN Katz MH Liang 1996 Total hip arthroplasty: use and select complications in the US Medicare population Am J Public Health 86 70 72 1:STN:280:DyaK287kvVyksw%3D%3D 8561246
3. N Bellamy WW Buchanan CH Goldsmith J Campbell LW Stitt 1988 Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol 15 1833 1840 1:STN:280: DyaL1M7lslCrsQ%3D%3D 3068365
4. Y Benyamini EA Leventhal H Leventhal 2000 Gender differences in processing information for making self-assessments of health Psychosom Med 62 354 364 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvnsVGluw%3D%3D 10845349
5. KJ Bozic KJ Saleh AG Rosenberg HE Rubash 2004 Economic evaluation in total hip arthroplasty: analysis and review of the literature J Arthroplasty 19 180 189 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00456-X 14973861
6. Cailliet R. Soft Tissue Pain and Disability. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Co; 1978.
7. ME Charlson P Pompei KL Ales CR MacKenzie 1987 A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation J Chronic Dis 40 373 383 1:STN:280:DyaL2s7ms1GnsQ%3D%3D 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 3558716
8. Cole T. Goniometry: The Measurement of Joint Motion. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1971.
9. RD D'Ambrosia 2005 Epidemiology of osteoarthritis Orthopedics 28 Suppl s201 s205 15747607
10. Daniels L, Worthingham C. Muscle Testing: Techniques of Manual Examination. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1972.
11. RM d'Aubigne M Postel 2009 The classic: functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. 1954 Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 7 27 10.1007/s11999-008-0572-1 18941852
12. WH Harris 1969 Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation J Bone Joint Surg Am. 51 737 755 1:STN:280:DyaF1M3gtlWltQ%3D%3D 5783851
13. Hoppenfeld S. Physical Examination of the Spine and Extremities. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1976.
14. RM Kaplan JE Alcaraz JP Anderson M Weisman 1996 Quality-adjusted life years lost to arthritis: effects of gender, race, and social class Arthritis Care Res 9 473 482 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ot1Sntg%3D%3D 10.1002/art.1790090609 9136291
15. Kaplan RM, Bush JW. Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychol. 1982:61-80.
16. JN Katz EA Wright E Guadagnoli MH Liang EW Karlson PD Cleary 1994 Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis Arthritis Rheum 37 687 694 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3kt1Whsw%3D%3D 10.1002/art.1780370512 8185695
17. Kendall HO KF, Wadsworth GE. Muscles: Testing and Function. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1971.
18. D Kennedy PW Stratford SM Pagura M Walsh LJ Woodhouse 2002 Comparison of gender and group differences in self-report and physical performance measures in total hip and knee arthroplasty candidates J Arthroplasty 17 70 77 10.1054/arth.2002.29324 11805928
19. DM Kennedy SE Hanna PW Stratford J Wessel JD Gollish 2006 Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 21 559 566 10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.010 16781410
20. T Kostamo RB Bourne JP Whittaker RW McCalden SJ MacDonald 2009 No difference in gender-specific hip replacement outcomes Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 135 140 10.1007/s11999-008-0466-2 18780137
21. C Lavernia M D'Apuzzo MD Rossi D Lee 2009 Is postoperative function after hip or knee arthroplasty influenced by preoperative functional levels? J Arthroplasty 24 1033 1043 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.010 18963759
22. JR Lieberman F Dorey P Shekelle L Schumacher DJ Kilgus BJ Thomas GA Finerman 1997 Outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of a traditional disease-specific and a quality-of-life measurement of outcome J Arthroplasty 12 639 645 1:STN:280:DyaK2svltFagug%3D%3D 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90136-4 9306214
23. P Marchetti R Binazzi V Vaccari M Girolami F Morici C Impallomeni M Commessatti L Silvello 2005 Long-term results with cementless Fitek (or Fitmore) cups J Arthroplasty 20 730 737 10.1016/j.arth.2004.11.019 16139709
24. F Mesa-Ramos M Mesa-Ramos C Maquieira-Canosa P Carpintero 2008 Predictors for blood transfusion following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study Acta Orthop Belg 74 83 89 18411606
25. Mohr T. Musculoeskeletal Analysis:TtheHip. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott Co; 1989.
26. AK Nilsdotter LS Lohmander 2002 Age and waiting time as predictors of outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis Rheumatology (Oxford) 41 1261 1267 10.1093/rheumatology/41.11.1261
27. PC Noble GG Box E Kamaric MJ Fink JW Alexander HS Tullos 1995 The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur Clin Orthop Relat Res 316 31 44 7634721
28. MI O'Connor 2006 Osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: sex and gender differences Orthop Clin North Am 37 559 568 10.1016/j.ocl.2006.09.004 17141013
29. AA Spirt M Assal ST Hansen Jr 2004 Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 1172 1178 15173289
30. N Sugano PC Noble E Kamaric 1999 Predicting the position of the femoral head center J Arthroplasty 14 102 107 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7isVWmsw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90210-3 9926961
31. LL Tosi BD Boyan AL Boskey 2005 Does sex matter in musculoskeletal health? The influence of sex and gender on musculoskeletal health J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 1631 1647 10.2106/JBJS.E.00218 15995134