Age and waiting time as predictors of outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis

Rheumatology

Volumn 41, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1261-1267

  Nilsdotter, A K ^a,b   Lohmander, L S ^b  

^a HALMSTAD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Age; Gender; Osteoarthritis; Outcome; Total hip replacement; Waiting time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GROUPS BY AGE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WAITING LISTS;

EID: 0036853201     PISSN: 14620324     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Danielsson L, Lindberg H. Prevalence of coxarthrosis in an urban population during four decades. Clin Orthop 1997;342:106-10.
2. Wiklund I, Romanus B. A Comparison of quality of life before and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg 1991;73A:765-9.
3. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997.
4. Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis: Time to shift the paradigm. Br Med J 1999;318:1299-300.
5. Nilsdotter AK, Aurell Y, Siösteen AK, Lohmander LS, Roos HP. Radiographic stage of osteoarthritis or sex of the patient does not predict one year outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:228-32.
6. Dieppe P, Chard J, Faulkner A, Lohmander S. Osteoarthritis In: Godlee F, ed. Clinical evidence. A compendium of the best evidence for effective health care, Vol. 5. London: BMJ Publishing Group 2001:808-22.
7. Bachmeier CJM, March LM, Cross MJ et al. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:137-46.
8. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:11-21.
9. Brander VA, Malhotra S, Jet J, Heinemann AW, Stulberg SD. Outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in persons aged 80 years and older. Clin Orthop 1997;345:67-78.
10. Petersen VS, Solgaard S, Simonsen B. Total hip replacement in patients aged 80 years and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37:219-22.
11. Birrell F, Johnell O, Silman A. Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next three decades: influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:569-72.
12. Altman RD, Hochberg M, Murphy WA, Wolfe FJ, Lequesne M. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1995;3:3-70.
13. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 364-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
14. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JR. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey-I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41:1349-58.
15. Roos EM, Klässbo M, Lohmander LS. WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities. Scand J Rheumatol 1999;28:210-5.
16. Söderman P. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:39-46.
17. Creamer P, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Hochberg MC. Where does it hurt? Pain localization in osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998;6:318-23.
18. Stucki G, Meier D, Stucki S et al. [Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Arthrosis Index]. Z Rheumatol 1996;55:40-9.
19. Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ et al. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2000;27:2635-41.
20. Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75A:1619-26.
21. Rissanen P, Aro S, Sintonen H, Slatis P, Paavolainen P. Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study. Qual Life Res 1996; 5:56-64.
22. Rissanen P, Aro S, Sintonen H, Asikainen K, Slatis P, Paavolainen P. Costs and cost-effectiveness in hip and knee replacements. A prospective study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997;13:575-88.
23. Birtwistle SJ, Wilson K, Porter ML. Long-term survival analysis of total hip replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999;78:180-3.
24. Callaghan JJ, Albright JC, Goetz DD et al. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement: minimum twenty-five year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:487-97.
25. Lingard E, Hashimoto H, Sledge C. Development of outcome research for total joint arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2000;5:175-7.
26. Norman-Taylor FH, Palmer CR, Villar RN. Quality-of-life improvement compared after hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:74-7.
27. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 2000; 27:1745-52.
28. Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadaguoli E et al. Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37:687-94.
29. Young NL, Cheah D, Waddell JP et al. Patient characteristics that affect the outcome of total hip arthroplasty: a review. Can J Surg 1998;41:188-95.
30. Fortin P, Clarke A, Joseph L et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42:1722-8.
31. Williams JI, Llewellyn Thomas H, Arshinoff R, Young N, Naylor CD. The burden of waiting for hip and knee replacements in Ontario. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team. J Eval Clin Pract 1997; 3:59-68.
32. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Arshinoff R, Bell M, Williams JI, Naylor CD. In the queue for total joint replacement: patients' perspectives on waiting times. Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team. J Eval Clin Pract 1998;4:63-74.
33. Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview. BMJ 1997;314:131-4.
34. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston WC, Suarez-Almazor ME. The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:454-60.