No difference in gender-specific hip replacement outcomes

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 467, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 135-140

  Kostamo, Timothy ^a   Bourne, Robert B ^a   Whittaker, John Paul ^a   McCalden, Richard W ^a   MacDonald, Steven J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HISTOLOGY; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEX RATIO; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEX DISTRIBUTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 58249085303     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0466-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. RE Booth Jr 2006 The gender-specific (female) knee Orthopedics. 29 768 769
2. RE Booth Jr 2006 Sex and the total knee: gender-sensitive designs Orthopedics. 29 836 838 (Pubitemid 44468671)
3. G Hawker J Wright P Coyte J Williams B Harvey R Glazier E Badley 2000 Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty N Engl J Med. 342 1044 1045
4. J Holtzman K Saleh R Kane 2002 Gender differences in functional status and pain in a Medicare population undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty Med Care. 40 461 470
5. EL Kaplan P Meier 1958 Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations J Am Stat Assoc. 53 457 481
6. EW Karlson LH Daltroy MH Liang HE Eaton JN Katz 1997 Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery Am J Med. 102 524 530 (Pubitemid 27305114)
7. JN Katz EA Wright E Guadagnoli MH Liang EW Karlson PD Cleary 1994 Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis Arthritis Rheum. 37 687 694 (Pubitemid 24145072)
8. D Kennedy S Hanna P Stratford J Wessel J Gollish 2006 Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 21 559 566 (Pubitemid 43866399)
9. A Looker T Beck E Orwoll 2001 Does body size account for gender differences in femur bone density and geometry? J Bone Miner Res. 16 1291 1299 (Pubitemid 32574658)
10. H Malchau P Herberts T Eisler G Garellick P Söderman 2002 The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84 2 20 (Pubitemid 35168331)
11. G Mall M Graw K Gehring M Hubig 2000 Determination of sex from femora Forensic Sci Int. 113 315 321 (Pubitemid 30649753)
12. LM Marshall JM Zmuda BK Chan E Barrett-Connor JA Cauley KE Ensrud TF Lang ES Orwoll 2008 Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Research Group. Race and ethnic variation in proximal femur structure and BMD among older men J Bone Miner Res. 23 121 130
13. D Nelson D Barondess S Hendrix T Beck 2000 Cross-sectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women J Bone Miner Res. 15 1992 1997 (Pubitemid 30760642)
14. M Peacock G Liu M Carey W Ambrosius C Turner S Hui CJ Johnston 1998 Bone mass and structure at the hip in men and women over the age of 60 years Osteoporosis Int. 8 231 239 (Pubitemid 28427072)
15. R Purkait 2003 Sex determination from femoral head measurements: a new approach Leg Med (Tokyo) 5 Suppl 1 S347 S350
16. R Purkait 2005 Triangle identified at the proximal end of femur: a new sex determinant Forensic Sci Int. 147 135 139 (Pubitemid 39572949)
17. C Röder J Parvizi S Eggli D Berry M Müller A Busato 2003 Demographic factors affecting long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 417 62 73 (Pubitemid 37499511)
18. K Tsai W Cheng T Sanchez C Chen P Chieng R Yang 1997 Bone densitometry of proximal femur in Chinese subjects: gender differences in bone mass and bone areas Bone. 20 365 369 (Pubitemid 27204409)
19. B Wheatley 2005 An evaluation of sex and body weight determination from the proximal femur using DXA technology and its potential for forensic anthropology Forensic Sci Int. 147 141 145 (Pubitemid 39572950)
20. LB Yates D Karasik TJ Beck LA Cupples DP Kiel 2007 Hip structural geometry in old and old-old age: similarities and differences between men and women Bone. 41 722 732 (Pubitemid 47393665)